NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2019, 11:50 AM
Bocabirdman's Avatar
Bocabirdman Bocabirdman is offline
Mike
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Rat Mouth
Posts: 3,158
Default 1965 Topps High Numbers Question

Hi Guys,

What number do 1965 Topps Hi Numbers start with? I looked around and different sources sort of fudge it by saying the Seventh Series. I know the # 523 Brumley is the first of the Short Prints. Is THAT where the Hi# start? Hell, I even found an article that cited 371-598 as Hi Numbers Is there really such a thing as a 1965 Semi-Hi Number? If so, what qualifies for that?

Last edited by Bocabirdman; 10-11-2019 at 11:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2019, 11:56 AM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is online now
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,240
Default

I'm not 100% sure, but the 7th series checklist starts with #507. I would assume that is the official start of the highs...
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2019, 11:58 AM
Bocabirdman's Avatar
Bocabirdman Bocabirdman is offline
Mike
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Rat Mouth
Posts: 3,158
Default

I am beginning to think that might be it....or it could be dealer's choice.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2019, 12:12 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is online now
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bocabirdman View Post
I am beginning to think that might be it....or it could be dealer's choice.
If a dealer is trying to pass off a semi-high as a high...well ok, but that's kind of BS. There is a defined starting point for all of them. That being said, '65 high numbers aren't really notorious as difficult ones, so as long as you are not buying like uber high-end graded cards, I would not think they are going to be dramatically more expensive for commons.
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2019, 12:22 PM
Bocabirdman's Avatar
Bocabirdman Bocabirdman is offline
Mike
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Rat Mouth
Posts: 3,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jchcollins View Post
If a dealer is trying to pass off a semi-high as a high...well ok, but that's kind of BS. There is a defined starting point for all of them. That being said, '65 high numbers aren't really notorious as difficult ones, so as long as you are not buying like uber high-end graded cards, I would not think they are going to be dramatically more expensive for commons.
I have seen some steady Centering issues with a good percentage of the Hi #s


Yes, I think that the Semi-Hi moniker is sort of a marketing ploy. However, they do seem to command SLIGHTLY more than low numbers. The Hi #/SP Premium is still not much compared to say 1967 or 1966. I am returning to the world of Topps after a decade flopping around in the Tobacco Card end of the pool. I am just trying to confirm (relearn to some extent.). Thank You for your help.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2019, 12:36 PM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is online now
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bocabirdman View Post
I have seen some steady Centering issues with a good percentage of the Hi #s


Yes, I think that the Semi-Hi moniker is sort of a marketing ploy. However, they do seem to command SLIGHTLY more than low numbers. The Hi #/SP Premium is still not much compared to say 1967 or 1966. I am returning to the world of Topps after a decade flopping around in the Tobacco Card end of the pool. I am just trying to confirm (relearn to some extent.). Thank You for your help.
To me, much of the high number hoopla is a moot point in today's tidily allocated marketplace / collecting world, where virtually any card ever produced, or at least a good 95% of them - can be at your doorstep within a week assuming you can afford it. A lot of the original drama around high numbers being difficult is that they actually were impossible to find back in the shop and show shoeleather days in the 1980's and earlier of having to go somewhere and look at tables, and in bins trying to find something. Back then, you literally couldn't find the card. It may not have been overly expensive, but some other collector beat you to it 20 minutes earlier. Today for all intents and purposes - as we all sit in our pajamas in front of the keyboard - "rare" cards simply mean they cost more if you want to pony up.
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers.

Last edited by jchcollins; 10-11-2019 at 12:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2023, 03:00 PM
Kevvyg1026 Kevvyg1026 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 453
Default 1965 highs

The 5th, 6th, and 7th series in 1965 were each 77 card series. Series 7 goes from 523 to 598, plus another copy of 507. Series 6 goes from 446 to 522 plus another copy of check 6. One half of a sheet is known from series 7, and Cliff and I have worked out a likely 2nd half sheet. Very little of series 6 is known, while both half sheets from series 5 are known.

There are short prints in all three of these series, but the Sps are still relatively available.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2023, 10:44 AM
lombo69 lombo69 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1
Default 7th series large & small print

How do you tell the difference between the large print & small print on the 7th series checklist variation if your not holding them next to each other.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-06-2023, 10:52 AM
G1911 G1911 is online now
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lombo69 View Post
How do you tell the difference between the large print & small print on the 7th series checklist variation if your not holding them next to each other.
With luck or better eyeballs than I have.

Seriously, this one I struggle to see even with several in hand. The best tell, I think, is to ignore the front print and look at the gap between the baseball on the back that contains the card number, and the blue bottom border.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2023, 12:31 PM
mikemb mikemb is offline
Mike Lenart
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Garwood, NJ
Posts: 406
Default

Large Print and Small Print. Not sure if it is my eyes but the "m" in #572 Orioles Team looks a bit cut off in the small pribt version.

Mike

img20230306_14100312 (2).jpg

img20230306_14112055.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-06-2023, 01:15 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,987
Default

Mike---just checked my two and agree the m is a little truncated on what I would call the version with the darker print on the front. Note that the version with the defective m also has a larger area of yellow below the names than the other version. I find that the easiest way to distinguish the two fronts
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2023, 01:29 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Note that the version with the defective m also has a larger area of yellow below the names than the other version. I find that the easiest way to distinguish the two fronts
Aha, I see that now, otherwise I looked and looked and couldn't find any differences.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1965 Topps lot of 130+ cards with 60 high numbers 125.00 varcity26 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 2 11-30-2017 07:10 PM
FS 21 different 1965 Topps All High Numbers Northviewcats 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 2 01-22-2016 12:40 PM
FS 61 Different 1965 Topps NM All High Numbers! Northviewcats 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 09-12-2014 08:51 AM
Lot of 13 different 1965 Topps High Numbers vintagetoppsguy 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 08-16-2013 07:01 PM
FS 5 Topps 1965 NM Ungraded High Numbers Northviewcats 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 2 01-31-2013 05:46 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:21 PM.


ebay GSB