Show your T4 Obak Premium cabinet cards

[jerrys]

T4 Obak Premium cabinets were distributed in conjunction with the Obak T212 card sets of players from the Northwestern and Pacific Coast Leagues.

t4.jpg

Shown are San Francisco players #82 Powell & #88 Zamlock

[Vintagecatcher]

One of my favorite cabinets: Claude Berry T4!

Patrick

[cdn_collector]

Wow, awesome. I can't imagine there are too many of those floating around.

Cheers,

Richard.

[conor912]

Originally Posted by cdn_collector

Wow, awesome. I can't imagine there are too many of those floating around.

Cheers,

Richard.

Yeah, someone tried this a while back. It was a short thread

[Kawika]

Thread just got a little longer. Here's a couple. Apologies for wonky scale difference.

[Vintagecatcher]

Here is my 1st T4 that was trimmed to the oval. I had it matted.

Patrick

[whaler]

Not sure if this is the coupon in my collection or just an image I had:

[MMarvelli]

T4 Patterson, Ham (F+B).jpg

[jerrys]

Adding the team and card number helps to identify these cards for the viewer.

david
schmidt sf #83 $2.9K
weaver sf #86 $23K - Why only sgc 1.5?

vintagecatcher
tiedeman oakland #31 Anyone have an oakland wolverton?

whaler
miller sf #75 $4.5k You have the right coupons

mark
patterson vernon #100

[Leon]

Great cards, guys.

[Vintagecatcher]

Leon, let's see the Hogan T4 from your collection!.

One of my favorites that I'd love to own someday!

Patrick

[BeanTown]

Originally Posted by jerrys

Adding the team and card number helps to identify these cards for the viewer.

david
schmidt sf #83 $2.9K
weaver sf #86 $23K - Why only sgc 1.5?

vintagecatcher
tiedeman oakland #31 Anyone have an oakland wolverton?

whaler
miller sf #75 $4.5k You have the right coupons

mark
patterson vernon #100

Im sure the low grade is because of the factory writing on the back for identification. Thats a great Weaver!!!! Wow

[Leon]

Originally Posted by BeanTown

Im sure the low grade is because of the factory writing on the back for identification. Thats a great Weaver!!!! Wow

+1 They take off for a mfg type mark LOL. Kind of like taking off for the tobacco stamp on the back of many Obaks. Doesn't make sense to me but what do I know?

[jerrys]

Thought I would shake the tree again. Thanks to Vintagecatcher for posting the John Tiederman T4 (above), a card I did not have on my verified checklist. I've accounted for about fifty T4 cabinets that have been sold over past twenty years. All the evidence was published in my two part Transformation article in Vintage Collector last year.

Beside the Weaver posted here by David there was a recording of another which I can not verify. Any help?

[edjs]

Jerry, this is the other Weaver. The other two may also be new to you, if you missed the Weaver.

[Vintagecatcher]

Hi Jerry,

Was your article in a Old Cardboard magazine or an online article?

I be interested in reading it if you have a link or a Old Cardboard Magazine issue #.

Thanks,

Patrick

[jerrys]

Hi Edward, The pictures of the cards you posted are rather small to make ids from. But I'm familiar with those cards you show - they are:

1 SF - Weaver
2 LA - Smith
3 Vernon - Roy Hitt

I have the Seals Weaver you show. What I am looking for is the price realized at auction of the second Weaver, same card as the one David shows.

V - Neither. As posted - it was published in Beckett's Vintage Collector Magazine. (OC Magazine has not published in quite some time.)

[edjs]

Originally Posted by jerrys

Hi Edward, The pictures of the cards you posted are rather small to make ids from. But I'm familiar with those cards you show - they are:

1 SF - Weaver
2 LA - Smith
3 Vernon - Roy Hitt

I have the Seals Weaver you show. What I am looking for is the price realized at auction of the second Weaver, same card as the one David shows.

V - Neither. As posted - it was published in Beckett's Vintage Collector Magazine. (OC Magazine has not published in quite some time.)

Here you are. SCP, November 2006. $28,283. Sorry about the picture size, downloaded from the website.

[jerrys]

Yes, the grade should be a 4. Pop 2. Thanks.