NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

View Poll Results: What was the best Topps set of the 1960's
1960 9 10.00%
1961 6 6.67%
1962 5 5.56%
1963 12 13.33%
1964 2 2.22%
1965 24 26.67%
1966 5 5.56%
1967 23 25.56%
1968 1 1.11%
1969 3 3.33%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2015, 12:16 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default Vote: Best Topps set of the 1960s

We are wrapping up the vote for the best Topps set of the 1950's in another thread and now need a set to represent the wonderful 1960's. Please cast your vote for the top set of the 1960's using any qualifying factors you see fit.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2015, 01:03 PM
39special's Avatar
39special 39special is offline
$teve O.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Berks County Pa.
Posts: 2,656
Default

I always liked the '65 set,that's what I picked,but the '62 set is a close 2nd.
__________________
Looking for'47-'66 Exhibits and any Carl Furillo,Rocky Colavito
and Johnny Callison stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2015, 01:11 PM
Vintagevault13's Avatar
Vintagevault13 Vintagevault13 is offline
€d M!££w00D
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 522
Default

1965. Many of the best HOF'er cards of 60's (Mantle, Aaron, Mays, Gibson). The banners/color combos are great.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Happy Collecting

Ed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2015, 06:00 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vintagevault13 View Post
1965. Many of the best HOF'er cards of 60's (Mantle, Aaron, Mays, Gibson). The banners/color combos are great.
You nailed it. There is something very truly appealing about the look and colors of the 1965 set. I'm sure it was a dream come true to the autograph collectors of the time, too. Beautiful pictures to get signed. This is probably my favorite set of the pre-action shots era.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-13-2015, 09:16 AM
TexasDan TexasDan is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 21
Default

Another vote for the 65 set. I had a more difficult time with the 50s set but not 60s.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-13-2015, 09:20 AM
HRBAKER's Avatar
HRBAKER HRBAKER is offline
Jeff
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 5,255
Default

'67 for purity of design and photography

I do think the '65-'67 sets are the best three year run in Topps history
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page

HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos

"Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-13-2015, 10:41 AM
jason.1969's Avatar
jason.1969 jason.1969 is offline
Jason A. Schwartz
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 1,892
Default

I wonder if all would agree 1961 is the worst!
__________________
Thanks,
Jason

Collecting interests and want lists at https://jasoncards.wordpress.com/201...nd-want-lists/
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-13-2015, 12:45 PM
jasonc's Avatar
jasonc jasonc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HRBAKER View Post
'67 for purity of design and photography

I do think the '65-'67 sets are the best three year run in Topps history

1967 here as well.

I had a feeling it was going to be a match race between 1965 and 1967.

Also, as for the worst, have to agree with 1961, but what about 1964 as well?
__________________
Excellent people to deal with: bnorth, Republicaninmass, obcmac, marcdelpercio, Michael Peich, dougscats, jimivintage, mybuddyinc, Luke, Bocabirdman, ncinin.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-13-2015, 01:08 PM
KCRfan1 KCRfan1 is offline
Lou Simcoe
L0u Sim.coe
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Olathe KS
Posts: 1,713
Default

I like the '65 set, but for me the '69 set is a close 2nd.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-13-2015, 02:28 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,729
Default

Quote:
I wonder if all would agree 1961 is the worst!
Hell no. It's my second favorite

1962 and 1969 are my least favorite, and I don't get the love for the 1967s either, but to each his own.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-14-2015, 10:47 AM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

This one is quickly turning into a two horse race
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-14-2015, 11:12 AM
Mark70Z's Avatar
Mark70Z Mark70Z is offline
M@rk Comer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,882
Default I like 'em all...

I guess I may be the only one who loves them all, but the '67 is the best (in my view).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-14-2015, 12:02 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,962
Default 1967

Your view is correct Mark. Someday you will have to explain it to Todd so he gets it

He was at least right about 61 being a good one too

Last edited by ALR-bishop; 06-14-2015 at 12:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-14-2015, 06:27 PM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default

If you're really keeping track I accidentally voted for 66 instead of 67. My three year old was "helping " me. That means take one 66 away and put in onto 67. Sorry.
Drew
__________________
Drew
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-14-2015, 06:53 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almostdone View Post
If you're really keeping track I accidentally voted for 66 instead of 67. My three year old was "helping " me. That means take one 66 away and put in onto 67. Sorry.
Drew
OK thanks .. I'll adjust the total if there is a one vote difference at the end of the vote.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-14-2015, 07:15 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,962
Default 1966

Drew-- maybe your little one prefers 66. His vote should matter
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-14-2015, 07:22 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Drew-- maybe your little one prefers 66. His vote should matter
True that. The kid has a better eye for cards than his daddy.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-14-2015, 08:50 PM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolemmings View Post
True that. The kid has a better eye for cards than his daddy.
Well first "he" is a "she" and just tonite I caught her looking through a box of junk 90s stuff. I believe she was looking at 91 Leaf so I'm not sure about the better eye part but heck, I'm just glad she is looking at any cards. Haha.
Drew
__________________
Drew
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-14-2015, 08:57 PM
nolemmings's Avatar
nolemmings nolemmings is offline
Todd Schultz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,729
Default

Oops, sorry about that. FWIW, I think 1991 Leaf is better looking than 1967 Topps too
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-14-2015, 09:25 PM
almostdone's Avatar
almostdone almostdone is offline
Drew Ekb@ck
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NE Georgia
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nolemmings View Post
Oops, sorry about that. FWIW, I think 1991 Leaf is better looking than 1967 Topps too
Well played my friend, well played.
Drew
__________________
Drew
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 06-14-2015, 09:58 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 8,962
Default 1991 Leaf

The appreciation of perfection is elusive to some
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-15-2015, 04:38 AM
Mark70Z's Avatar
Mark70Z Mark70Z is offline
M@rk Comer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,882
Default 1967 Topps

What he said ^
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-15-2015, 04:42 AM
Mark70Z's Avatar
Mark70Z Mark70Z is offline
M@rk Comer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,882
Default 1967 Topps

Just as a side note, I really like the way Donnie put the "1967" set in italics; I'm assuming this is due to him thinking this set should be the clear cut winner
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-15-2015, 12:35 PM
stlcardsfan stlcardsfan is offline
D.an Jackso.n
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Near the STL
Posts: 762
Default

I voted 67 with 65 a close second. I like the simplicity of the 67 set and it was a challenge to build this set. I still go back and look at the high #s fairly often. I'm sure that is part of why it like it so much.

The pennant design of 65 is pretty darn cool though. Probably my favorite design of the '60 sets.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-15-2015, 05:44 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark70Z View Post
Just as a side note, I really like the way Donnie put the "1967" set in italics; I'm assuming this is due to him thinking this set should be the clear cut winner
Mark... 67 is in italics to you because that's the year you voted for.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-15-2015, 05:52 PM
Mark70Z's Avatar
Mark70Z Mark70Z is offline
M@rk Comer
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,882
Default I'm so smart...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer1999 View Post
Mark... 67 is in italics to you because that's the year you voted for.
Ha! I'm SOOO smart!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-16-2015, 11:25 AM
JTysver JTysver is offline
Jay T.
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 457
Default

I'm going with 1963. I like the inset photos and its a colorful set. The Photos are higher quality and the quality of paper is really good.

After that I go with 1960 and then 1967.
__________________
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-16-2015, 01:42 PM
1963Topps Set 1963Topps Set is offline
Tom
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: America
Posts: 1,125
Default

I went with the 1963 set as well. 1969 has to be my least favorite.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-18-2015, 08:12 AM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

Would love to have a few more votes to break this virtual tie. The winner goes up against the 1956 Topps set and the yet to be determined 70s set.

Thanks for voting :-)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-18-2015, 11:12 AM
rats60's Avatar
rats60 rats60 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mountaineer1999 View Post
Would love to have a few more votes to break this virtual tie. The winner goes up against the 1956 Topps set and the yet to be determined 70s set.

Thanks for voting :-)
Since it is so close, you could include both in the final poll.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 06-18-2015, 01:41 PM
Mountaineer1999's Avatar
Mountaineer1999 Mountaineer1999 is offline
D0NN1E B
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 965
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rats60 View Post
Since it is so close, you could include both in the final poll.

I thought about that Rats but didnt want to split up the 60s vote
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vote - best Topps set Touch'EmAll Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 119 05-14-2018 09:10 AM
Top Topps sets! Lets put it to a vote Mountaineer1999 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 14 06-13-2015 09:58 AM
Need Help On Value: Mostly 1960s Topps Lot bundy462 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 4 03-20-2012 01:25 PM
1960s Topps ungraded for sale Archive 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 08-20-2008 10:12 AM
1960s Topps Salesman Samples Archive Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 10-15-2007 09:05 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:30 AM.


ebay GSB