|
|
View Poll Results: Am I unethical if I? SEE THREAD FOR COMPLETE QUESTION | |||
Bend corners back | 29 | 19.46% | |
Rub off wax with panty hose | 17 | 11.41% | |
Erase pencil marks | 51 | 34.23% | |
Soak cards to remove glue, dirt or stains | 42 | 28.19% | |
Use acetone to remove ink or grime | 96 | 64.43% | |
Use other chemicals to clean and/or brighten card | 110 | 73.83% | |
Fix creases and/or pinholes with Kurt's magic spray | 118 | 79.19% | |
Use a black marker on the corners of my 1971 Topps | 138 | 92.62% | |
Trim off the fuzzy edges of the card | 122 | 81.88% | |
BONUS: Am I unethical if I submit my work to PSA and they grade it | 77 | 51.68% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Some were pretty clear, others maybe not.
For example, I voted that using acetone etc to remove ink or other stuff was. But found an easy example just a few lines down with the black marker on 71s. That's clearly wrong. But would removing that black marker be "bad" ... I don't think so. With the usual caution that we have no actual data on how that would affect the card long term. The bonus question was difficult. I could do stuff to an already altered card like the above 71 and send it to PSA expecting nothing better than "Authentic" If The self proclaimed experts cant spot it, and give it a number grade, that's an entirely different question. They could be incompetent, thus their claim of expertise is questionable and maybe unethical. Or their stated standards are more flexible than I would like. If I then sell that card without disclosure... again sort of a gray area. It would be a 71 whatever graded X... Personally I would disclose the removed alteration, but I could see the argument that it's a PSA X because that's what the label says. I have a card that I had graded, thought it was better than the VG it got. When I asked SGC at their booth, the guy there pointed out a well done erasure on the back that I'd totally missed. Now, I still disagree with the grade, but not as much. I'd thought it was VG-EX, maybe a bit better, now maybe g-vg. That probably should be disclosed so at least the next owner (Likely a long time from now) will know not to bother cracking it out in hoped of a better grade. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Corrected Poll: 1938 Goudey "Head's Up" Series | Snapolit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 05-12-2016 09:05 AM |
Legendary Lot 72: 1909-1920s "E"-Caramel Cards and "W"-Strip Cards "Grab-Bag" | x2drich2000 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 09-02-2013 10:07 AM |
1921 Schapira Babe Ruth "Portrait" variations poll | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-18-2012 12:45 PM |
Large amount of "e", "w", and "t" cards (and more) for sale/trade!! | shammus | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2010 11:31 AM |
POLL: Total population of all "known" Uzit T206's? | Chicago206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-22-2010 04:06 PM |