|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Ruth Rookie
Not even close. I just measured both based on super-sized scans. $717K Ruth approximately 60/40. $552 Ruth approx. 30/70 (give or take of course). That equates to a 10% difference on each border or an overall 20% disparity to the visual appeal. Bottom line is the difference between a 60/40 card and 30/70 card is immense. Now add in two glaring print lines and that strongly justifies the pricing variance between the two cards.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
off the market | Shoeless Moe | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 03-05-2014 01:32 PM |
Is the baseball card market a "perfect" market? The Demise of the "price guide" | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-29-2013 09:09 PM |
Flattening 3D cards | Paul S | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 08-24-2012 04:09 AM |
T-210 Market | Bill Stone | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 09-18-2009 12:19 PM |
Housing / Stock Market Affecting Card Market ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-09-2007 10:37 AM |