Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Fake Signed T206 Cards (Too Many to List in the Title, See First Post for List) (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=262673)

hcv123 12-18-2018 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duluth Eskimo (Post 1837264)

The issue I have with your comment is that you think there is no process and the amount of time is unsatisfactory to you. If they choose to put one second, one minute, or one hour in to an item, that is their right to do so. They are putting their reputation on the line. If their reputation is damaged, then the market will reflect this and their business will go away after the market corrects.

I have no skin in the autograph game - precisely for what has come to light in this thread. While the above that you shared is a great THEORY - taking into consideration the imperfection of markets - it is often NOT how it works in practice. I have read a number of articles and watched a specific video done under cover catching Spence authenticating a signature that the under cover reporter had signed hours earlier and confronted by the ball player (Sal Bando). Problem is - most collectors do not do the same level of due diligence and do not know about these incidents - as most will never read this thread! So history has shown - there is no "market correction" as you suggest - just the continued proliferation of greed, forged autographs, altered cards and worthless opinions. While I do not know who they are, I understand there are guys doing this for long enough that the small few "in the know" rely on for truly expert opinions - guys who may have made honest mistakes, but have stood the test of time without the repeated carelessness and controversy and apparent negligence as some mentioned in this thread. Forgery is a crime. Is claiming to be an "expert" when your history has shown (imo) that you are not? Outside of netting you more money - how is this all possibly good for the hobby?

Daveyc 12-18-2018 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duluth Eskimo (Post 1837264)
I do have a pretty good idea on how autographs are authenticated. I have been buying and selling them for over 30 years. Some take longer and more study and some take merely a glance. If an autograph expert (let's for fun just say it's an expert) only takes 2 seconds to look at an item, it doesn't mean it's not authentic. You are paying for that unbiased "let's also for fun say they're unbiased" authenticators opinion to make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside and more confident in purchasing the autograph.

If you bring a Babe Ruth ball and it's clearly not a run of the mill forgery, they are going to take much more time on it. They might even ask multiple people for their opinion as well before giving a letter. BTW, letters are signed in front of a notary public and sent out in the mail. Not "voila" or "poof" or whatever you described.

A person pays the authentication company for their opinion, despite many others opinions who think they should be libel for saying it's authentic. This is done to make the buyer feel confident in their purchase having another party say they also believe the item is authentic. OR the seller who is letting buyers know that there is this third party who also agrees with the sellers opinion of authenticity. Items that come with LOA's from PSA and JSA often, if not all times, fetch more at auction or direct sale than those without.

I know this because I do business with some of these authentication companies as I already described. I sell items and guarantee them to pass or they already come with the authentication. This is to increase my bottom line, no other reason. There are plenty of people who refuse to do business with these companies, but try to get top dollar without playing the TPA game nowadays. It doesn't work. If I get a letter and double my money, guess what, i'm getting the letter or COA.

The issue I have with your comment is that you think there is no process and the amount of time is unsatisfactory to you. If they choose to put one second, one minute, or one hour in to an item, that is their right to do so. They are putting their reputation on the line. If their reputation is damaged, then the market will reflect this and their business will go away after the market corrects.

Lastly, There are WAAAAAAYYYYYY more trimmed and altered cards in PSA and SGC holders than there are fake autographs that are authenticated by PSA and JSA. The card game is far worse than the auto game. People may argue with me all they want, but you will never convince me otherwise. Many, many full time dealers "work" on cards before they are sent off to the TPA. Most pass or pass the next time.

Bottom line, complain all you want about the TPA companies but they serve a purpose and command higher dollar results at the end of the day. I sell autographs and memorabilia to make money, the more the better for me an my family.

I said nothing about trimmed or altered cards. you added that little tid bit to try and deflect from the topic at hand. not applicable here. The authentication game is faulty from the start. first off, where do these "experts" get their training? you will probably never get an answer from any of the TPA on that one. if they did answer the question, they would probably say their experts have years and years and years of experience..... well, where did that experience come from? I believe both Spence and Steve Grad "studied" under everyones favorite, Bill Mastro.

One can have all the experience in the world and it is all worthless if the person they are apprenticed under is not qualified themselves. remember, only perfect practice makes perfect. everything else is just practiced mistakes.

It is relatively easy to create these forgeries, but the "experts" seem to have a much harder time finding them. at some point, collectors at large will realize the "authenticated" signature is nothing more than a piece of paperwork, and really doesnt amount to a hill of beans

Duluth Eskimo 12-18-2018 12:20 PM

You’re right. I’m trying to deflect because you have me all tied up with your genius ramblings. I’m going to go lay by my dish completely defeated.

Daveyc 12-18-2018 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duluth Eskimo (Post 1837434)
You’re right. I’m trying to deflect because you have me all tied up with your genius ramblings. I’m going to go lay by my dish completely defeated.

sounds good.

packs 12-18-2018 12:30 PM

How can you say it's so easy to make these forgeries? People were fooled for years in some cases. And not just the TPA's, but people who have been in the hobby for a very long time and might consider themselves experts in this very specific area.

calvindog 12-18-2018 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1837436)
How can you say it's so easy to make these forgeries? People were fooled for years in some cases. And not just the TPA's, but people who have been in the hobby for a very long time and might consider themselves experts in this very specific area.

Lots of dummies in this hobby. Lots of dummies in this hobby who seem to want to be fooled. Lots of dummies in this hobby who appoint themselves as experts.

jchcollins 12-18-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1837491)
Lots of dummies in this hobby. Lots of dummies in this hobby who seem to want to be fooled. Lots of dummies in this hobby who appoint themselves as experts.

Again to the point of why I don't collect autos. As a kid, the fact that a card was "old" was cool enough for me. Look at this thing that came out of a pack 30, 50, even 75 years ago! At least for items like tobacco cards or Goudeys, it seems a little too good to be true for all of those that are coming out now to have been autographed as well. But to the points made earlier - people get all romanticized about something and can lose reasonable objectivity. I get it.

Daveyc 12-19-2018 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1837436)
How can you say it's so easy to make these forgeries? People were fooled for years in some cases. And not just the TPA's, but people who have been in the hobby for a very long time and might consider themselves experts in this very specific area.

there are artists who would not have much problem at all replicating the shaky signatures of men in their 70's and 80's.

irv 12-19-2018 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daveyc (Post 1837432)
I said nothing about trimmed or altered cards. you added that little tid bit to try and deflect from the topic at hand. not applicable here. The authentication game is faulty from the start. first off, where do these "experts" get their training? you will probably never get an answer from any of the TPA on that one. if they did answer the question, they would probably say their experts have years and years and years of experience..... well, where did that experience come from? I believe both Spence and Steve Grad "studied" under everyones favorite, Bill Mastro.

One can have all the experience in the world and it is all worthless if the person they are apprenticed under is not qualified themselves. remember, only perfect practice makes perfect. everything else is just practiced mistakes.

It is relatively easy to create these forgeries, but the "experts" seem to have a much harder time finding them. at some point, collectors at large will realize the "authenticated" signature is nothing more than a piece of paperwork, and really doesnt amount to a hill of beans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVbgxFF0SaU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCGxsGelS50

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NADYoGCl1Mc

There's a ton of these vids available but as we have seen and learned, likely not many know these are available and should be watched before purchasing anything signed. :(

1880nonsports 12-19-2018 10:19 AM

not sure whether to thank you
 
or not - your forgeries news links linked to more links and I've already spent an hour looking at them. I bookmarked the Halper one to savor after my gin game...…….

daves_resale_shop 12-19-2018 10:57 AM

Forged t206’s
 
Any update on who the culprit(s) are?

Leon 12-19-2018 11:28 AM

The parties that have been the most affected know the name and are still working with authorities. I just got off of the phone with one of them and there is no new news so the situation is the same. If someone has some emergency issue, or thinks they have bad signed cards from this same person, they should PM me and we can discuss it. I know some people hate that the name hasn't been made public but as of this moment it's not the most prudent thing, imo, or the opinions of the few people who have had to write refund checks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by daves_resale_shop (Post 1837834)
Any update on who the culprit(s) are?


vintagetoppsguy 12-19-2018 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1837845)
The parties that have been the most affected know the name and are still working with authorities. I just got off of the phone with one of them and there is no new news so the situation is the same. If someone has some emergency issue, or thinks they have bad signed cards from this same person, they should PM me and we can discuss it. I know some people hate that the name hasn't been made public but as of this moment it's not the most prudent thing, imo, or the opinions of the few people who have had to write refund checks.

Thanks for the update and I realize you can't divulge too much information, but is it a name we'll recognize?

Leon 12-19-2018 12:56 PM

Thanks for your understanding.
No, it is not a hobby name anyone would know of....I don't believe. At least the auctioneers I have spoken with didn't know the name, as well myself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy (Post 1837850)
Thanks for the update and I realize you can't divulge too much information, but is it a name we'll recognize?


Jasonxmay 12-19-2018 06:13 PM

Identity
 
Next to REA I’ve written the biggest refund check for a single card as I authorized Brian to withhold the $21,000 that I would have received from the sale of the Baker that I had purchased from REA in 2015. I should also add that Brian refunded me for the $9,000 I paid for the card originally, so although I lost $12,000, I’m not out anything. I’ve had two separate people message me with the same information regarding the culprit. The first person wanted me to release the information, but then changed his mind at the request of the investigators. Because I’m an attorney I felt that the communication was confidential and so I did not release it at that time. However, another individual has now asked that I release the information on his behalf and since I see no compelling reason not to I am going to disclose it. I practice exclusively criminal defense and I can guarantee that there is absolutely no legitimate reason that law enforcement would not want this information released. Here is the information I have regarding the identity of the subject/suspect:

eBay ID: givepeaceachance14
eBay location: Girard, OH

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1837845)
The parties that have been the most affected know the name and are still working with authorities. I just got off of the phone with one of them and there is no new news so the situation is the same. If someone has some emergency issue, or thinks they have bad signed cards from this same person, they should PM me and we can discuss it. I know some people hate that the name hasn't been made public but as of this moment it's not the most prudent thing, imo, or the opinions of the few people who have had to write refund checks.


Peter_Spaeth 12-19-2018 06:29 PM

It's not too late to vote for Jason as the #1 Net 54 poster. :)

A&G CR 12-19-2018 06:44 PM

full name?

rainier2004 12-19-2018 07:50 PM

This is an interesting article:

http://www.wfmj.com/story/35123889/y...raud-to-prison

RedsFan1941 12-19-2018 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A&G CR (Post 1837962)
full name?

and address so the net54 mob knows where to find him

Leon 12-19-2018 08:44 PM

There can be no legitimate reason for authorities to say they prefer the info not be made public yet? And you are guaranteeing it. Cool.

According to you, you are out nothing financially and REA is out (a lot more) than you mentioned and this was ok to do? I am glad you aren't out anything as others are. Great move here..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasonxmay (Post 1837955)
Next to REA I’ve written the biggest refund check for a single card as I authorized Brian to withhold the $21,000 that I would have received from the sale of the Baker that I had purchased from REA in 2015. I should also add that Brian refunded me for the $9,000 I paid for the card originally, so although I lost $12,000, I’m not out anything. I’ve had two separate people message me with the same information regarding the culprit. The first person wanted me to release the information, but then changed his mind at the request of the investigators. Because I’m an attorney I felt that the communication was confidential and so I did not release it at that time. However, another individual has now asked that I release the information on his behalf and since I see no compelling reason not to I am going to disclose it. I practice exclusively criminal defense and I can guarantee that there is absolutely no legitimate reason that law enforcement would not want this information released. Here is the information I have regarding the identity of the subject/suspect:

eBay ID: givepeaceachance14
eBay location: Girard, OH


RichardSimon 12-19-2018 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rainier2004 (Post 1837974)

What a class act. He made his mother a criminal.

Peter_Spaeth 12-19-2018 09:22 PM

REA refunded Jason the 9K he originally spent on the fake auto. Should he not have accepted the money?

mantlefan 12-20-2018 12:08 AM

Props
 
Thank you Jason.

The weeks old: "I'll tell you soon" party line was getting tiresome.

ullmandds 12-20-2018 06:26 AM

givepeaceachance...I tell ya...it's ironic to me...almost every time an ebayer is revealed to be a crook of sorts...their name is ironic in that it includes something sketchy...in this case disguised as a do gooder!

7nohitter 12-20-2018 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1838042)
givepeaceachance...I tell ya...it's ironic to me...almost every time an ebayer is revealed to be a crook of sorts...their name is ironic.

Agreed! He'll most likely come back as: "Idneversellfaket206's"

ullmandds 12-20-2018 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7nohitter (Post 1838043)
Agreed! He'll most likely come back as: "Idneversellfaket206's"

right! or jesussavessignedt206collectors!!

bnorth 12-20-2018 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ullmandds (Post 1838042)
givepeaceachance...I tell ya...it's ironic to me...almost every time an ebayer is revealed to be a crook of sorts...their name is ironic in that it includes something sketchy...in this case disguised as a do gooder!

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7nohitter (Post 1838043)
Agreed! He'll most likely come back as: "Idneversellfaket206's"

LOL, don't forget the i'm 100% a scammer/POS "God Bless" they add.:eek::D

packs 12-20-2018 08:34 AM

Why wouldn't the auction house be out the money? The buyer paid for something they didn't receive that was represented as something it wasn't. The buyer is supposed to absorb the loss on something like that?

Orioles1954 12-20-2018 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1838062)
Why wouldn't the auction house be out the money? The buyer paid for something they didn't receive that was represented as something it wasn't. The buyer is supposed to absorb the loss on something like that?

I think in most cases the TPA would reimburse.

packs 12-20-2018 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orioles1954 (Post 1838064)
I think in most cases the TPA would reimburse.

But it would be up to the AH or consignor to pursue that, not the buyer.

jad22 12-20-2018 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orioles1954 (Post 1838064)
I think in most cases the TPA would reimburse.

Is that true? Since its an opinion in general some of the TPAs will disagree with each other. In this case, there is clear cut evidence that they are wrong. So are people all getting reimbursed by JSA/PSA/SGC?

Orioles1954 12-20-2018 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jad22 (Post 1838068)
Is that true? Since its an opinion in general some of the TPAs will disagree with each other. In this case, there is clear cut evidence that they are wrong. So are people all getting reimbursed by JSA/PSA/SGC?

No...I meant the AHs in this situation. But that's just a guess.

brianp-beme 12-20-2018 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasonxmay (Post 1837955)
eBay ID: givepeaceachance14
eBay location: Girard, OH

All I am saying, was John Lennon a forger?

Brian

packs 12-20-2018 12:12 PM

I don't see how you could pursue a refund on an opinion.

If the auction description described the item as being an authentic signature as a matter of fact and not opinion, then the item was clearly not described correctly and that, in my opinion, would be grounds for a refund on the sale.

If anything I think this whole situation might have a positive impact on how descriptions for lots are written to reflect opinions for what they are. This is just a snippet from a description written by an AH for a signed T206:

Marquard has boldly signed the card on the front in blue ink, with the signature grading "9/10."

Now, that to me is saying that Marquard unquestionably signed the card. A more accurate description would say "the signature is bold and in blue ink, with the signature on the card grading "9/10".

frankbmd 12-20-2018 12:51 PM

Hey Brian, Brent, Al, Scott, Lee, Joe et al,

All future autograph auction listings should include the following verbiage:

”Presumed Authentic”

regardless of the authenticater or certification.

Problem solved. Your welcome.;)

jad22 12-20-2018 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frankbmd (Post 1838123)
Hey Brian, Brent, Al, Scott, Lee, Joe et al,

All future autograph auction listings should include the following verbiage:

”Presumed Authentic”

regardless of the authenticater or certification.

Problem solved. Your welcome.;)

That's good. "Here is a presumably unaltered T206 Ty Cobb card that is presumably signed by Cobb".

Exhibitman 12-20-2018 02:38 PM

W/R/T refunds and who pays, last year I purchased a JSA full-certed signed card from a MEARS auction that turned out to be a pre-print. Both companies offered an immediate refund when I provided the information establishing the mistake. I am not sure which of them bore the ultimate cost of it.

It isn't that mistakes are made--they are--it is how they are handled. Whether it is a $500 error or a $9,000 error, the auctioneer should do as Brian did and the TPA should step up and make good to the auctioneer. The only one who should be out money is the TPA who made the mistake that touched off the whole chain of events. I would think that the public relations damage of JSA or SGC or PSADNA refusing to do so would cause would greatly exceed the cost of being exposed as someone who does not stand behind the work product. Not to mention the cost of being embroiled in what could be some FUGLY litigation over the snafu.

Bigdaddy 12-20-2018 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1838117)
I don't see how you could pursue a refund on an opinion.

PSA - the 'A' stands for Authenticator. One of the services they provide, according to their main webpage is "Autograph Authentication"

One of the main selling points of the TPAs is to 'authenticate' a particular piece of memorabilia (card, autograph, etc) therefore increasing the value of the item. See their claims of record setting prices for items they have graded.

They are not just selling opinions. That may be what you are getting, but that is not what the TPAs are marketing.

RedsFan1941 12-20-2018 10:35 PM

whatever happened to “Never get cheated”?

Fred 12-20-2018 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exhibitman (Post 1838140)
It isn't that mistakes are made--they are--it is how they are handled. Whether it is a $500 error or a $9,000 error, the auctioneer should do as Brian did and the TPA should step up and make good to the auctioneer. The only one who should be out money is the TPA who made the mistake that touched off the whole chain of events.

Could not agree more. It will make them a bit more cautious of what they're doing.

au·then·tic
/ôˈTHen(t)ik
adjective

of undisputed origin; genuine.
"the letter is now accepted as an authentic document"
synonyms: genuine, real, bona fide, true, veritable;

Vintageclout 12-20-2018 11:46 PM

Fake T206s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jad22 (Post 1838135)
That's good. "Here is a presumably unaltered T206 Ty Cobb card that is presumably signed by Cobb".

Do we also start stating: “this T206 Mint 9 Bat Off Cobb is presumed to be unaltered and NOT trimmed to achieve its pinnacle grade”???? It’s NOT just autographs that require a “leap of faith”, and if collectors think it is, they are only fooling themselves. Bottom line is, like it or not, the current state of the hobby is built upon the “assumed” expertise of PSA, SGC, JSA, MEARS, etc., and their card grading, autograph and game used assessments. Until someone can do consistently better, their “opinions” (if that’s what you want to call them), will continue to be accepted by most auction houses and collectors as gospel. If we start hedging on their grading/autograph decisions, where does that leave us? I’ll tell you where...back to the pre-grading/authentication years when ramped “wild-west” fraud ignited Operation Bullpen.

Leon 12-21-2018 07:13 AM

Don't buy high grade vintage or autographs without good provenance, graded (opinionated) or not. Problem mostly solved. I have never sweat over an autograph. I have never bought one. And I only have one higher grade card and know where it came from before being graded. No doubt there are altered cards in high grade holders but at least they are real. :) A fake autograph just ruins whatever it is on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vintageclout (Post 1838308)
Do we also start stating: “this T206 Mint 9 Bat Off Cobb is presumed to be unaltered and NOT trimmed to achieve its pinnacle grade”???? It’s NOT just autographs that require a “leap of faith”, and if collectors think it is, they are only fooling thrmsrlves. Bottom line is, like it or not, the current state of the hobby is built upon the “assumed” expertise of PSA, SGC, JSA, MEARS, etc., and their card grading, autograph and game used assessments. Until someone can do consistently better, their “opinions” (if that’s what you want to call them), will continue to be accepted by most auction houses and collectors as gospel. If we start hedging on their grading/autograph decisions, where does that leave us? I’ll tell you where...back to the pre-grading and authentication years where ramped “wild-west” fraud ignited Operation Bullpen.


packs 12-21-2018 08:22 AM

I don't really see the outrage over "opinions" being in the description. If you read any LOA you have you will only read an opinion. So if you accept an opinion on your LOA, then why can't you accept the word in the auction description?

Republicaninmass 12-21-2018 08:31 AM

I'd think "trimmed t206s too many to list" would be more apropos. Likely to cause too many hard feelings though, as it would upset many more members here

RichardSimon 12-21-2018 10:49 AM

Are other collectible hobbies plagued by such fraudulent behavior as this one is?
I am sure there is fraud in other hobbies but is it this widespread?
My other hobbies do not involve collecting anything, fortunately, except my airline boarding passes.

T206Collector 12-21-2018 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838376)
Are other collectible hobbies plagued by such fraudulent behavior as this one is?

Real/fake art has it's own Netflix docu-series...

https://www.netflix.com/title/81032626

Peter_Spaeth 12-21-2018 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838376)
Are other collectible hobbies plagued by such fraudulent behavior as this one is?
I am sure there is fraud in other hobbies but is it this widespread?
My other hobbies do not involve collecting anything, fortunately, except my airline boarding passes.

This is all probably chump change compared to art, antiques, stamps, coins, etc.

steve B 12-21-2018 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1838408)
This is all probably chump change compared to art, antiques, stamps, coins, etc.


It depends. One of the more prolific stamp fakers recently did volume, but mostly didn't get much for his stuff. I bought one, and it was a 60 cent stamp altered to make a maybe 600 dollar stamp that I "won" for about ten bucks.

Famous forgers work in some cases is itself collectible, and sometimes sells for more than the original (I don't own a Sperati or Fournier, that I know of but will eventually. )


The authentication process is probably more involved for the really expensive stuff and isn't generally done on a time schedule. I believe it's the same for art and antiques, but the money in some art is amazing. Coins I'm not so sure about, but there is a lot of well done fakery these days.

packs 12-21-2018 01:20 PM

Art has always been faked. Every year people go to museums and look at fraudulent artwork. According to this 2010 article, it's estimated that 20 % of all artwork in major British museums are fraudulent pieces.

I'm sure an expert looked at these paintings too. You can't ask for infallibility from a human being.

jfkheat 12-21-2018 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838376)
Are other collectible hobbies plagued by such fraudulent behavior as this one is?

There is a lot of fraud in the classic car/muscle car market.
James

Bigdaddy 12-21-2018 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838376)
Are other collectible hobbies plagued by such fraudulent behavior as this one is?

If money is involved, the answer is yes. And the more money, the more fraud.

RichardSimon 12-21-2018 02:57 PM

I was aware of the art, it always gets press coverage.
But do stamps and coins have as much fraud as this hobby?
Do less popular collectibles have a lot of fraud?

bgar3 12-21-2018 03:17 PM

Rare Books
 
The rare book market went thru a forgery scandal in the 1930’s when some incredible research, much like this research, discovered that a number of pamphlets thought to be first editions, were published at a later date. The forger was identified as one of the world’s greatest collectors and bibliographer, who himself authenticated the forgeries. The story is fascinating and research continues to this day. The book that first described the forgeries is An Equiry into certain Nineteenth Century Pamphlets, by John Carter and Graham Pollard.
If anyone is interested I could supply other titles. The forger was Thomas Wise.
There have been other interesting more recent examples like the Mormon and Texas history forgeries, in which a number of people were killed.

Shoeless Moe 12-21-2018 03:38 PM

I'm confused (which doesn't take much)

If this happened in early 2017:

http://www.wfmj.com/story/35123889/y...raud-to-prison

Who's doing it now? his grandma?

SetBuilder 12-21-2018 03:48 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The Vinland Map has recently been proven to be a fake and the evidence continues to mount.

Yet it is still displayed at the Yale Beinecke Library in a nice shiny display case. Go figure.

Jasonxmay 12-21-2018 03:52 PM

The article names 2 other residents of Girard, one of whom got probation and the other of whom had yet to be sentenced at the time the article was written. I’d also point out that 6 years prison does not mean 6 years prison. If Ohio is anything like Oklahoma 6 years prison could mean a few months incarceration followed by supervised probation, possibly with an ankle monitor. This activity obviously seems very serious to us in the hobby, but for prosecutors and law enforcement this is very low level stuff. In fact, I would guess that even a second offense would result in minimal punishment. If I were representing the guilty party I’d feel like anything more serious than a deferred sentence would mean I didn’t do my job very well. It will be interesting to see how things unfold, but my expectations are low.

Jason

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 1838483)
I'm confused (which doesn't take much)

If this happened in early 2017:

http://www.wfmj.com/story/35123889/y...raud-to-prison

Who's doing it now? his grandma?


Eggoman 12-21-2018 04:16 PM

Someone MUCH MORE knowledgeable about US Coins than I am could better tell the story of a forger who was making rare date $20 St. Gaudens Gold Coins from common ones...

His work was so good that he was never caught, I believe, despite the fact that he left his mark on many of the coins that he worked on.

His "work" is even collectible today because of his "talent".

I'm sure that I'm forgetting some of the details...

steve B 12-21-2018 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838471)
I was aware of the art, it always gets press coverage.
But do stamps and coins have as much fraud as this hobby?
Do less popular collectibles have a lot of fraud?


I suppose it depends on what you think of as both "as much" and fraud.


Stamps has plenty of low level stuff going on. altering something to appear to be something it's not is pretty easy. And doing stuff to make less saleable items saleable is even easier. And that's been going on almost as long as there's been a hobby. Sometimes it was done years ago, and that can get amusing at times.


The main area I collect is the 1873 and 1879 officials. in 1875 the POD decided to print reprints of every us stamp ever issued as part of the upcoming centennial celebrations. To prevent illegal use, they overprinted the officials with "specimen" Some were really common, some sold less than 100 copies. And for years collectors didn't think much of those overprinted stamps. The common ones often have the "Specimen" erased and a fake cancel added sometimes it's well done, sometimes they just crossed the overprint out with a pen. On ones like the 1cent executive dept its an effort to turn a stamp that might sell for $15 into one that might bring 2-400. On others it gets sort of comical... I have one of the really uncommon ones that was done to. 72 copies sold, catalog value 1200. I got it for $20 as a common used copy of the basic stamp. It's not worth 1200, but certainly more than 20 and whoever altered it in the past sort of did me a favor as I probably wouldn't own one otherwise.


Cancellations and other postal markings are faked pretty often, stamps are added to covers to represent rare uses, etc. Most aren't truly expensive, and that's because the authenticating groups take their time making a decision. And ALL the really expesnive stuff gets scrutinized very closely. Even stuff that's known to be "good" .

A few articles

http://www.rfrajola.com/opinions/klep.htm

http://www.rfrajola.com/opinions/gslc.htm


This one is a summary of a controversial group of stamps. The most recent expertizing took 5 Years and resulted in a book full of details that even most stamp collectors couldn't love.

http://www.rfrajola.com/grinnells/grinnells.htm

SetBuilder 12-21-2018 06:02 PM

Stanley Gibbons (the people behind the British version on the Scott stamp catalog) purchased the printing plates for several early Argentina stamps (the 1862-65 issues I believe) and ran off a bunch of forgeries that continue to confuse stamp collectors to this day.

That's about as scandalous as Jefferson Burdick printing thousands of card fakes and still being held in high regard.

steve B 12-22-2018 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SetBuilder (Post 1838537)
Stanley Gibbons (the people behind the British version on the Scott stamp catalog) purchased the printing plates for several early Argentina stamps (the 1862-65 issues I believe) and ran off a bunch of forgeries that continue to confuse stamp collectors to this day.

That's about as scandalous as Jefferson Burdick printing thousands of card fakes and still being held in high regard.


Stanley Gibbons is their own company.


And when they were newish both Scotts and Gibbons did some iffy things, some more iffy than others. Many of the early dealers who sold in large volume did.

One of the salesmen (Or other official) for one of the banknote companies was regularly an early visitor to any new government in South America. Want instant legitimacy? You NEED stamps! Thousands of them, in as many different denominations as you can afford. Nevermind that the ousted government left behind a few hundred thousand I sold them 2 years ago, you need your own stamps as soon as possible!


Then his friends would buy the remainders at a few cents on the Dollar. And sometimes he doubled the order and kept half. The purchased stamps were sold to a few very large dealers in Europe who made packets for sale to new collectors. Quite a racket.

xplainer 12-23-2018 05:37 PM

This thread is saddening, yet very informative.
Proof is in the pictures.
Why I love Net54.

Daveyc 12-24-2018 05:38 AM

Forged coins are somewhat common, coming from China

Stampsfan 12-24-2018 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1838339)
I don't really see the outrage over "opinions" being in the description. If you read any LOA you have you will only read an opinion. So if you accept an opinion on your LOA, then why can't you accept the word in the auction description?

They’re called LOA’s because they mean “Letter of Authenticity”. Nothing there implies or states it is an opinion.

If they were called “OOA” (Opinions on Authenticity) or “LOAO” (Letter of Authenticity Opinion) then I might lean a little more to agreeing with you.

Stating it’s your LOA and underlying in the fine print that it’s an opinion is borderline fraud.

doug.goodman 12-24-2018 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stampsfan (Post 1839274)
They’re called LOA’s because they mean “Letter of Authenticity”. Nothing there implies or states it is an opinion.

If they were called “OOA” (Opinions on Authenticity) or “LOAO” (Letter of Authenticity Opinion” then I might lean a little more to agreeing with you.

Stating it’s your LOA and underlying in the fine print that it’s an opinion is borderline fraud.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

The people who get paid for their opinions wouldn't get paid as much if they spent time underlining the part about it being an opinion.

The people who pay for opinions want to believe that the opinions they pay for are some sort of guarantee.

So they treat them as if they are.

It's not "borderline fraud", it's blatant ignorance of the facts.

You get what you pay for.

Not what you want to think you paid for.

Or maybe you don't.

Laughing out loud.

Doug

eliotdeutsch 12-26-2018 08:58 AM

Has anyone seen this? Not a T206 though...

https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?m...2F303008674347

Peter_Spaeth 12-26-2018 09:05 AM

It doesn't appear the ebay ID that was revealed rang a bell with anyone? Virtually nothing has been said about it.

frankbmd 12-26-2018 09:11 AM

Where have we seen this before
 
LMFAO

Letters Marketing Fraudulently Authentic Opinions

Aquarian Sports Cards 12-26-2018 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eliotdeutsch (Post 1839617)
Has anyone seen this? Not a T206 though...

https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?m...2F303008674347

LOL at the ink that was smudged approximately yesterday.

irv 12-27-2018 09:57 AM

Having read tidbits on here about Sal Bando and not knowing what some were referring to, I decided to check to see if I could find anything.

It didn't take long to find this, which I assume is the story people are alluding to in here?
https://forums.collectors.com/discus...d-news-for-jsa

In my searching it was easy to find other stories as well, which only makes me scratch my head further wondering how some of these companies are still in business today? :confused:
https://live.autographmagazine.com/f...-they-possibly

I'll abide with Leon's wishes not to post the Hauls of Shame link, but that one is real interesting as well. :eek:

ihmeyers 12-27-2018 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards (Post 1839636)
LOL at the ink that was smudged approximately yesterday.


Looks like it was signed with one of those rare early 20th century sharpies. :D

ballparks 12-28-2018 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838376)
Are other collectible hobbies plagued by such fraudulent behavior as this one is?
I am sure there is fraud in other hobbies but is it this widespread?
My other hobbies do not involve collecting anything, fortunately, except my airline boarding passes.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/sour_grapes_2016

Amazing documentary on how the wine hobby was duped. Watch it!

BruceinGa 12-28-2018 06:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838471)
But do stamps and coins have as much fraud as this hobby?

I remember as a kid in the early 60's hearing about tampered 1944 D Lincoln cent being altered to appear as a 1914 D. There were others but my memory, well, you know.:rolleyes:

itslarry 12-28-2018 07:00 AM

Killing stamp market from what people are forums seem to be. Saying. Or killed it I should say.
Anywhere there is money and the chance for people to cheat, sadly.

ALBB 12-28-2018 07:09 AM

forge
 
Records too

I got burned with some early " rare " Beatle records, also another famous fake is the John Lennon Roots LP

irv 01-24-2019 07:11 PM

Any new updates on this? Did PSA, SGC or JSA (James Spence authentication) have anything to say about this yet or has all been hush hush? :confused:

Another thread was started discussing the impact this will have on the Auto side of collecting. Have people noticed this and seen a big drop in prices or people collecting them?

Was/were the perp(s) ever caught and charged or is this investigation still ongoing?

MichelaiTorres83 01-26-2019 07:09 AM

The EBay username was shown. Everyone was satisfied they were part of the in crowd now, so the thread died, pending a new major update that will excite the masses again.

topcat61 01-26-2019 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichelaiTorres83 (Post 1848983)
The EBay username was shown. Everyone was satisfied they were part of the in crowd now, so the thread died, pending a new major update that will excite the masses again.

I heard that they know who this is but there's a related issue that everyone is dancing around and that is the grading companies passing this stuff -and then there are the auctions. I think both of these institutions bear some responsibility and collectors need answers.

Collectors bear some responsibility too. Many are too impatient, don't ask questions, properly research and take the word of authenticators as gospel without knowing their backgrounds.

Tell me, does everything go back to the way it was once this guy is caught? Or, do we as collectors and dealers have a responsibility to make sure these kind of things are not forgotten so they don't happen again?

bnorth 01-26-2019 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topcat61 (Post 1849017)
I heard that they know who this is but there's a related issue that everyone is dancing around and that is the grading companies passing this stuff -and then there are the auctions. I think both of these institutions bear some responsibility and collectors need answers.

Collectors bear some responsibility too. Many are too impatient, don't ask questions, properly research and take the word of authenticators as gospel without knowing their backgrounds.

Tell me, does everything go back to the way it was once this guy is caught? Or, do we as collectors and dealers have a responsibility to make sure these kind of things are not forgotten so they don't happen again?

LOL, what changed?:confused:

NOBODY CARES. Scammers get outed all the time and people still line up to buy from them. If you read the threads outing the scammers there are other scammers posting in those threads on how that is now or should be accepted in the hobby.

topcat61 01-28-2019 11:29 AM

There isn't anything funny about this. It isn't that nobody cares -the collectors who got taken care. A friend of mine got taken for 18 grand on one card alone. How about the integrity of the Hobby we all enjoy?

If anyone hasn't seen it yet, the documentary on Netflix called "Sour Grapes" really points out that many collectors turn a blind eye or make excuses for things they know is wrong. At what point does the Hobby come crashing down again? You know it will at some point and it's going to be harder and harder to convince new collectors to part with their money if everything they see is built on fraud.

packs 01-28-2019 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topcat61 (Post 1849664)
There isn't anything funny about this. It isn't that nobody cares -the collectors who got taken care. A friend of mine got taken for 18 grand on one card alone. How about the integrity of the Hobby we all enjoy?

If anyone hasn't seen it yet, the documentary on Netflix called "Sour Grapes" really points out that many collectors turn a blind eye or make excuses for things they know is wrong. At what point does the Hobby come crashing down again? You know it will at some point and it's going to be harder and harder to convince new collectors to part with their money if everything they see is built on fraud.

Everything isn't built on fraud though. This is an issue with autograph authentication. Nobody has been able to create a T206 that passed as authentic made in 2019.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 AM.