Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Show...me...your print variations! (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=187722)

savedfrommyspokes 02-10-2020 08:43 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Found this 71 T Hisle card with what looks like some non-factory ink spilled on the card while out in circulation. However, it seems to be a print variant afterall as I was able to locate another copy of this card with what appears to be the same print anomaly but with far less ink. It almost looks like during the printing process someone tried to but was not able to remove all signs of this anomaly in subsequent printings. Anyone else have a copy of either?

Cliff Bowman 02-10-2020 09:50 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Battersbox on eBay has a nice copy of the lighter version... well they did two minutes ago anyway :D.

irv 02-10-2020 12:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 1950255)
Just picked this up. Busted yellow plate

Notice the white area of where cardinals logo should be yellow, is the same as the yellow in the white name box.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Hi Ted.

What's your take on my recently purchased Walker Cooper card? Not near as much yellow as yours but I assume the same/similar story?

steve B 02-11-2020 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes (Post 1954152)
Found this 71 T Hisle card with what looks like some non-factory ink spilled on the card while out in circulation. However, it seems to be a print variant afterall as I was able to locate another copy of this card with what appears to be the same print anomaly but with far less ink. It almost looks like during the printing process someone tried to but was not able to remove all signs of this anomaly in subsequent printings. Anyone else have a copy of either?

That's a crazy one. There must have been something spilled on some part of the camera equipment for it to have ended up on both the black and magenta plates (maybe others too? )

Cliff Bowman 02-19-2020 09:00 PM

10 Attachment(s)
I posted this 1977 Topps recurring print flaw a few years ago on this thread, I figured I would have an update of it with new additions. I still haven't found examples of Charlie Williams, Larry Biittner, Andres Mora, Jim Bibby, Bruce Boisclair, Gaylord Perry, and I am always looking for better examples and upgrades of the ones I have.

savedfrommyspokes 02-20-2020 06:53 AM

8 Attachment(s)
Cliff, since you first posted about this, I have found a few....the Roberts, DaVanon and Bibby I had not seen before. What is interesting is that some copies of the same card have varying levels of this anomaly showing. The Foster I show has much less than yours and on the two Dobson cards the difference is quite noticeable. The Bonham and Reed are non-related variants.

Cliff Bowman 02-20-2020 11:41 AM

4 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by savedfrommyspokes (Post 1956595)
Cliff, since you first posted about this, I have found a few....the Roberts, DaVanon and Bibby I had not seen before. What is interesting is that some copies of the same card have varying levels of this anomaly showing. The Foster I show has much less than yours and on the two Dobson cards the difference is quite noticeable. The Bonham and Reed are non-related variants.

You are right about the varying degrees, ideally I am trying to end up with examples that are 50/50 right down the middle. My Alan Foster goes a little too far and I would like to end up with one closer to yours. I have a Boisclair but it doesn't match the pattern at all, too large and it wound up on the wrong side. Your Bibby would fit in perfectly because it is roughly 50/50, and your Dobson would be a better example than mine. I believe you also have an Aurelio Rodriguez that is a better example than mine. The Roberts and the DaVanon are from different sheets, I have some that are from different sheets but they are so rare and random that I haven't been able to pick up patterns of which cards are affected on those sheets. The Bonham is on a different sheet and is recurring. It also affects the Tiant next to it, but it is much less on the Tiant.

Exhibitman 02-20-2020 01:37 PM

Takes a lot to impress me given that I've been chasing printing flaws for years, but these two definitely got my attention:

http://photos.imageevent.com/exhibit...ckless%201.jpg

1971 Topps blackless

http://photos.imageevent.com/exhibit...0Stock%201.jpghttp://photos.imageevent.com/exhibit...0Stock%202.jpg

1972 Topps flipped stock.

Best of all, got 'em here on the BST.

Mark70Z 02-20-2020 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exhibitman (Post 1956648)
Takes a lot to impress me given that I've been chasing printing flaws for years, but these two definitely got my attention:

The 1971 looks like a progressive proof to me.

Exhibitman 02-20-2020 05:38 PM

I thought so too but the back is completely printed.

http://photos.imageevent.com/exhibit...ckless%202.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 AM.