![]() |
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
These have already been discussed but I can now show the three of them in one scan and what I believe is the fourth card affected. It's possible that there is a more severe version of the Susce, this one is partially missing black ink on the cartoon character's shoe, his head and hat, and a letter 'a'. It's also possible that a fifth card Billy Muffett is missing ink but I doubt it exists, it was under Slaughter on the sheet. I couldn't figure out how to enlarge the scan for the site so I took a picture which is only a little better.
|
4 Attachment(s)
Here are the four cards individually to show more detail.
|
1968 Reese
Here's something I didn't expect to see. I don't chase variations, so I do not notice them often, but just for grins I sometimes look to see if there are any 1968 red blob cap Rich Reese cards like the one I posted some time ago. I have not seen one since, until today, and thought it was kind of funny that Topps stamped an error card as part of their buy-back promotion:
https://photos.imageevent.com/imover.../REeseblob.jpg |
Hi yes don't usually see. I surprisingly saw this one as well via a heritage box insert.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...bedde9ecf1.jpg
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk |
1 Attachment(s)
I saw a 1978 Topps Bump Wills Black Circle error card a few years ago with that stamp on it, it was off grade otherwise it would have been a shame. This is the only stamped card that I own, a real neat 1977 Topps Pete LaCock print error ruined by the stamp.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Darrel Chaney "Green Tint"
Brant Alyea "Spot on left eye" Jim Nash "Red spot on hat" Phil Gagliano "Partial blackout on team, name and infield" Bobby Valentine "Psychadelic blurred version" |
1950 #245 Papai
1 Attachment(s)
We are all familiar with the copyright vs. NO copyright on this one. A late discovery is the card with a blue slash at the lower left side. I just bought an extra version of it and found that the blue slash was on a COPYRIGHT PRESENT version while the others were on the NO copyright version. Therefore, this is a mystery as to how the slash, an obvious error, appears on both versions of the copyright.
|
Neat discovery Thomas. Similar to the 52 House yellow tiger showing up on regular and gray back cards. Seems to be a cropping differences on the two you just posted too
|
Quote:
What cropping can you see on this pair? This is a scan showing only the no copyright with and without slash. I did not bother to include the two versions WITH the copyright for now. Thanks. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM. |