![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
There was a 64 Roggenburk printed on the bottom row and I would say 99.6% that is the origin of that print flaw on it.
|
Thanks Cliff
|
1 Attachment(s)
I know this is post 1980, but this thread looks to be where the action is on print errors and variations...I just found this card in my 82 Topps commons box. What the heck happened here? Anyone seen one like this before?
|
Soaked-in-Windex variation?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That could be from a couple things.
A dry print, where the plate doesn't get dampened and retains ink everywhere. During washdown, where they cleaned ink off the blanket with solvent, which smears it at first. But that usually isn't this consistent. Or, a sheet of paper, or the surface of a sheet got stuck on the blanket, and retained ink since it's porous. Of those, I think it's probably the last one. |
1 Attachment(s)
I am guessing that these two cards were next to each other on their original sheet. While I did not do the best job to line it up perfectly on the scanner, the little black line in the white blemish line up. I found at least one copy of each card with (nearly) the same print blemish which continues from one card to the other.
|
Yes, I have one or two 1982s that have most of the card covered in that blue color. Although, if memory serves, it does not cover the entire card like yours, more like 2/3 or card.
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Here is the 1982 Topps E* sheet, Glenn Hubbard is the third card on the fourth row and Dewey Robinson is the fifth card on the fifth row. Undoubtedly at the very least the cards surrounding them were also printed with the same defect.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 PM. |