Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Show...me...your print variations! (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=187722)

Cliff Bowman 01-06-2021 03:07 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by ejstel (Post 2052433)
.

Also sharing the '80 clark...might be one here already.

Jack Clark and Graig Nettles were side by side on the 1980 Topps D* sheet and both were affected by the blue ink explosion, but while the Clark is relatively easy to find the Nettles is near impossible. Of course Al has one :rolleyes:.

ALR-bishop 01-08-2021 12:43 PM

https://hosting.photobucket.com/imag...-08_134006.jpg

Sliphorn 01-12-2021 01:32 PM

Theory About 1963 Fleer FB
 
1 Attachment(s)
In the process of upgrading both versions of 1963 Fleer #64 Bob Dougherty, I have come to this conclusion:

I know that the set was printed in one sheet, with # 1 down to #8, #9 down to #16, etc., up to #88. There was also a sheet that, for some reason, used #5 down to #8 and #1 down to #4. There was no red stripe on the bottom most card, meaning every card divisible by 4 has both a red stripe version and a no stripe version.

I had decided to replace both of these back-stained cards and had no problem finding a no stripe version. In checking on the card WITH a red stripe, I can find only one or two with lots of no stripes available.

My theory therefore is that they likely removed both Dougherty and Long in order to insert the checklist later in the run, using the second cited sheet with Dougherty in the fourth spot down and with the red stripe as a result being removed. Thus there is a shortage of the #64 WITH the stripe. I believe that the other version is not really a big SP after all since it likely stayed in the run from the beginning.

I am not expecting everyone to follow this, but this is what I am seeing.

aronbenabe 01-13-2021 02:41 PM

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a9e6a792cf.jpg
Anyone else see this variation in the 75 Set?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cliff Bowman 01-13-2021 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aronbenabe (Post 2055616)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a9e6a792cf.jpg
Anyone else see this variation in the 75 Set?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The second Aaron is either low ink or more likely sun faded.

Exhibitman 01-13-2021 05:13 PM

https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...0Grabowski.jpg

1969 Topps Jim Grabowski blackless and missing some yellow ink

https://photos.imageevent.com/exhibi...n_%20Jimmy.jpg

1969 Topps Jimmy Johnson blackless and missing yellow ink.

The backs are perfect.

frankhardy 02-06-2021 02:23 PM

I just ran across this one recently. Take a look at the back where it says Topps above the card number. See the difference in location?

Can anyone confirm if this one is reoccurring? I just checked all of the backs on COMC and could not find the variation. It is not like it is a print dot or print smudge. Seems like this one would almost have to be reoccurring. Thoughts?

= = =

I'm editing this post because I just noticed something right after I posted it. Looks like all of the green on the back is shifted down. Now maybe I'm thinking this might not be reoccurring. Possible, I guess, right?

https://i.postimg.cc/0QSFZ73M/013-19...-Variation.jpg

ALR-bishop 02-07-2021 11:01 AM

Neat find Shane. Have not yet seen another

aronbenabe 02-15-2021 07:40 PM

Notice that all of the green print has shifted downward on the back of the variant card.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bobsbbcards 02-21-2021 05:50 AM

Is this "mermaid tattoo" on Lou's sleeve recurring or a print defect. Curious collectors want to know! (I apologize if I've axed this before--I'm old)

https://caimages.collectors.com/psai...306Sleater.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 AM.