Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   March Pick-Ups: (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=251953)

jfkheat 03-28-2018 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JollyElm (Post 1761842)
In general, I'm accumulating graded high numbers to trade, but have been on a bit of a 1961 All Star tear lately. So many HOF'ers, so little time.

The 1961 All Star cards are my favorite. 1960 is a close second. I have a 1962 Drysdale AS PSA 9 on the way. I have all 102 of the 1960s AS cards but I'm always looking for upgrades.
James

Peter_Spaeth 03-28-2018 09:22 PM

3 Attachment(s)
A couple more 66s. And the best $30 card money can buy.

aconte 03-28-2018 09:44 PM

Nice Peter!

Stonepony 03-29-2018 05:40 AM

Yeah Topps Giants are beautiful cards and so cheap for a classic 60s issue

jchcollins 03-29-2018 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irv (Post 1757358)
... reminds me of my Kuzava, which, to this day is a grade I can't figure out.:confused:

Is that some very light spider-creasing through the top of Kuzava's hat? If not, could it be something in the scan?

Wrinkles that can be very difficult to see are usually one of the first suspects on otherwise very nice cards that come back a 5 and surprise you. Mostly they are on the back, but I've seen some 5's that have multiple light wrinkles on the front.

If it's none of the above, then who knows. I've seen a lot of 6's lately that could be 7's. I've argued for a while now that PSA should have some type of service - maybe even make it premium - where the grade your card got is explained in a paragraph or something like that, if they aren't going to do sub-grades like Beckett does for the newer cards. I guess they would see that as skewing their business model, and it would only add to their already ridiculous turnaround times, however. I don't know. I think that back in the early days of TPG's, PSA was probably on par with SGC in terms of strictness. Here lately they seem to be harsher graders - particularly with vintage - to prove some kind of point. Everything seems to be more of a game anymore than taken at face value...

JollyElm 03-29-2018 03:17 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Got this one for a fairly decent price...

Attachment 310622

jfkheat 03-29-2018 04:39 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Got these two today. The Drysdale is an upgrade for my 62 AS subset. The Stuart gets me down to needing three cards to finish my 64 Stand-up set.
James

irv 03-29-2018 05:08 PM

4 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jchcollins (Post 1762339)
Is that some very light spider-creasing through the top of Kuzava's hat? If not, could it be something in the scan?

Wrinkles that can be very difficult to see are usually one of the first suspects on otherwise very nice cards that come back a 5 and surprise you. Mostly they are on the back, but I've seen some 5's that have multiple light wrinkles on the front.

If it's none of the above, then who knows. I've seen a lot of 6's lately that could be 7's. I've argued for a while now that PSA should have some type of service - maybe even make it premium - where the grade your card got is explained in a paragraph or something like that, if they aren't going to do sub-grades like Beckett does for the newer cards. I guess they would see that as skewing their business model, and it would only add to their already ridiculous turnaround times, however. I don't know. I think that back in the early days of TPG's, PSA was probably on par with SGC in terms of strictness. Here lately they seem to be harsher graders - particularly with vintage - to prove some kind of point. Everything seems to be more of a game anymore than taken at face value...

John, I really don't think there is any spider wrinkling/creasing in the hat, but I need to purchase a loupe as my eyes aren't what they once were.
I believe when I talked about this card before, there might have been a little bit of that wrinkling on the back? IIRC, it was hardly noticeable but likely the reason for the grade. The TPG, imo, despite the tiny bit of wrinkling, graded it tough. If I could find all 3's in this condition, I'd purchase them all.

Rekindling the 52 Topps theme that was prevalent earlier in this post. These arrived a few days ago, plus another multiplayer card as well.

Baseballcrazy62 03-30-2018 05:48 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Love these Wheaties tins.

the 'stache 03-30-2018 09:59 AM

Some real beautiful cards so far this month, guys. I'm chomping at the bit to get back to collecting. Soon. :)

Peter, that '64 Giant Bob Gibson is gorgeous. Looking on Ebay at some of the big name guys, I'm shocked that they're not more in demand, from a price point perspective. I know they're an oddity, as far as Topps issues go, but the investor in me says that at some point, these are going to go up in value.

There are a couple gorgeous Mickey Mantles with certified autos. I'd love to own one of those. The Hank Aaron is one of my favorite Hammerin' Hank issues. The Clemente, too.

I wonder why there's no Eddie Mathews, though?

jfkheat 03-30-2018 01:54 PM

2 Attachment(s)
The 63 Fleer Yastrzemski is from the LOTG auction. It is an upgrade for the PSA 8 in my set. Picked up the 1959 Aaron/Mathews Fence Busters a couple weeks ago so I thought I would add the 1958 one.

James

JollyElm 03-30-2018 02:55 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Knocked this card off of my need list, thanks in part to the recent ebay coupon code thread...

Attachment 310724

Peter_Spaeth 04-01-2018 08:11 PM

2 Attachment(s)
More postwar.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:05 AM.