Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   T206 Big 3 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=89553)

Archive 05-02-2008 11:39 PM

T206 Big 3
 
Posted By: <b>Adam</b><p>227k for the Heritage Wagner. Amazing.

Archive 05-03-2008 12:28 AM

T206 Big 3
 
Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>The Plank has paper loss on the back in the upper right. Still a very attractive card.<br />JimB

Archive 05-03-2008 06:56 AM

T206 Big 3
 
Posted By: <b>T206Collector</b><p>...it didn't have the paper loss on reverse.<br /><br />Here's a couple of rough cornered SGC cards with higher grades for being clean otherwise. I will say that I do think the Schreck is a weak 60.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1209815672.JPG"> <br /><br /><a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/pmifsud3d/SGCGradedCards/photo#5083349535689216162"><img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/pmifsud3d/RouveE_nEKI/AAAAAAAAAjs/cyYq4DYn-Ko/s800/Bender%20Portrait%20SGC%2050.JPG" /></a><br /><br /><br><br>_ <u> </u> _ <u> </u> _ <u> </u> _ <u> </u> _ <u> </u> _ <u> </u> _ _ <br /><br />Visit <a href="http://www.t206collector.com" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.t206collector.com</a> this month as we count down 4 Magies, 2 Wagners and a Plank!<br />

Archive 05-03-2008 12:01 PM

T206 Big 3
 
Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>That Plank is gorgeous, but I think it is a high-end 3, even without the back paper loss. The upper right corner is too rough for a 4 in my opinion. <br /><br />Paul,<br />Please don't take this the wrong way, but I think your Schreck is overgraded. Should be 50 IMHO. I could post scans of some of my cards in SGC 50 holders that should be 84s on that scale.<br />JimB

Archive 05-03-2008 01:50 PM

T206 Big 3
 
Posted By: <b>Jeff Lichtman</b><p>Jim, I think by traditional grading standards the Plank is a 3, agreed, due to the corners and, of course, the paper loss. But rarely does one find a 3 that has the image of the player as clear or bright as that Plank does. My point is that I don't think the price that was paid for the Plank last night should at all be used as a touchstone for the next Plank 3 -- which could have a crease running through the face. Just like there are 1s that are really .2s, that Plank 3 was more like a 3.8.

Archive 05-03-2008 03:02 PM

T206 Big 3
 
Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>Jeff,<br />I agree. Based on eye-appeal, the card is stunning. I would love to own it! Looks like Wagners and Planks both went up in value this week.<br />JimB


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 PM.