Net54baseball.com Forums - Poll - The Stock Market and Vintage Sales
Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Poll - The Stock Market and Vintage Sales (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=359014)

joshuanip 03-18-2025 09:18 PM

.

Peter_Spaeth 03-18-2025 10:06 PM

Speaking of alternative assets, gold hsa hit what I think is an all time high, at lesat dollar wise (I believe there may be other ways to look at it where it's still nowhere near its 90s levels).

Balticfox 03-19-2025 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshuanip (Post 2504096)
I was speaking generally... and they do hedge, that's why they are called hedge funds.

I'm skeptical. Hedge funds call themselves that because the correlation coefficient of their returns against those of the stock market are low. That though doesn't mean they can't be very risky indeed. That's what history shows anyway.

:(

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2504132)
I'm skeptical. Hedge funds call themselves that because the correlation coefficient of their returns against those of the stock market are low. That though doesn't mean they can't be very risky indeed. That's what history shows anyway.

:(

So why do they attract such huge amounts of capital, if people would be better off with index funds, or a mix of index funds and bond funds? Countless billions are invested in these funds.

joshuanip 03-19-2025 10:42 AM

.

Balticfox 03-19-2025 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504181)
So why do they attract such huge amounts of capital, if people would be better off with index funds, or a mix of index funds and bond funds?

I wasn't the one who made that argument. I would sooner trust a portfolio manager with a long above average track record to beat the market than an index selected not to beat the average but to be the average. Yes, the statistical evidence for my preference is lacking but I'd rather choose an experienced, intelligent investor to manage my portfolio than the chimpanzee who beat the market the most by throwing darts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504181)
Countless billions are invested in these funds.

Because every investor an edge, and every single hedge fund manager can make a very good case why his strategy will deliver the superior risk adjusted returns. Only some (a very few?) succeed though.

;)

Balticfox 03-19-2025 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshuanip (Post 2504192)
Don't want to get into a wormhole but bottom line you have a right to be skeptical.

I don't just have the right to be skeptical; I'm right to be skeptical.

;)

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2504207)
I wasn't the one who made that argument. I would sooner trust a portfolio manager with a long above average track record to beat the market than an index selected not to beat the average but to be the average. Yes, the statistical evidence for my preference is lacking but I'd rather choose an experienced, intelligent investor to manage my portfolio than the chimpanzee who beat the market the most by throwing darts.



Because every investor an edge, and every single hedge fund manager can make a very good case why his strategy will deliver the superior risk adjusted returns. Only some (a very few?) succeed though.

;)

Are you familiar with Eugene Fama's research or John Bogle's book?

raulus 03-19-2025 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504181)
So why do they attract such huge amounts of capital, if people would be better off with index funds, or a mix of index funds and bond funds? Countless billions are invested in these funds.

Everyone thinks they have an edge!

And the hedgies seem to be pretty good at selling their story.

No doubt, some of them are probably pretty good, and might even be worth their elevated fees. I think the general premise is their ability to deliver in any market, although they might miss out on the high highs, they'll also protect you from the downswings.

Often another marketing element is their ability to invest in nontraditional assets that might be off-limits in more traditional funds.

Of course, Buffett's bet didn't make the hedgies look all that great:

https://proinvestnews.com/2025/01/28...for-investors/

joshuanip 03-19-2025 12:29 PM

.

joshuanip 03-19-2025 12:32 PM

.

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 12:38 PM

S&P Global publishes its SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active) scorecards twice a year. The scorecard compares the performance of active mutual funds (after fees) to relevant S&P benchmark indexes over periods of one, three, five, 10, and 15 years. It found that 88% of active large-cap funds failed to beat the S&P 500 over the last 15 years as of the end of 2023. Even when you look at a shorter three-year period, about 80% failed to beat the benchmark.

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 12:39 PM

1 Attachment(s)
https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/ma...-beat-markets/

joshuanip 03-19-2025 12:46 PM

.

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joshuanip (Post 2504237)
It’s hard for mutual funds and 40 act funds to beat the benchmark indices in general because of their structural constraints.

Unconstrained funds have resources, access, and mandate to perform better.

OK I am finding the same data for hedge funds. Assume you will say it's not a valid comparison?

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/the-s...nt-even-close/

joshuanip 03-19-2025 01:09 PM

.

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 01:27 PM

Seems one can manipulate or select data to prove either side of it, from what I am seeing online. Not surprisingly, the data purporting to show hedge fund returns are mostly superior are from ..... hedge funds. People seeming more like academics say the opposite.

Balticfox 03-19-2025 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504218)
Are you familiar with Eugene Fama's research or John Bogle's book?

Sadly no. I'll look them up.

:(

1952boyntoncollector 03-19-2025 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504181)
So why do they attract such huge amounts of capital, if people would be better off with index funds, or a mix of index funds and bond funds? Countless billions are invested in these funds.

i have talked to many of fund manager and when i ask them that SPY outperforms 95 percent of funds, they always agree, but they say individuals get too scared to hold them during those extreme downs and rather just let someone else manage

Go and call some of the fund guys..and ask them if they out perform the S and P since the inception of their fund....you will see they dont 95 percent of time time

1952boyntoncollector 03-19-2025 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504239)
OK I am finding the same data for hedge funds. Assume you will say it's not a valid comparison?

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/the-s...nt-even-close/

show me the data you are showing....even CNBC and every network will say S and P has outperformed almost every hedge fund....i would wonder where your sources are and how long they are tracking...

Gorditadogg 03-19-2025 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox (Post 2504207)
I wasn't the one who made that argument. I would sooner trust a portfolio manager with a long above average track record to beat the market than an index selected not to beat the average but to be the average. Yes, the statistical evidence for my preference is lacking but I'd rather choose an experienced, intelligent investor to manage my portfolio than the chimpanzee who beat the market the most by throwing darts.



Because every investor an edge, and every single hedge fund manager can make a very good case why his strategy will deliver the superior risk adjusted returns. Only some (a very few?) succeed though.

;)

The thing about chimpanzees, though, is that you don't have to pay them very much. The results show over and over that the funds with the highest returns are the ones with the lowest fees.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Gorditadogg 03-19-2025 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504218)
Are you familiar with Eugene Fama's research or John Bogle's book?

Peter, are you going for your MBA in Finance? Those are a couple big names to know if you are.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 2504319)
show me the data you are showing....even CNBC and every network will say S and P has outperformed almost every hedge fund....i would wonder where your sources are and how long they are tracking...

Yes, that is what I am saying, not sure why you think I am saying the opposite?

Peter_Spaeth 03-19-2025 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg (Post 2504323)
Peter, are you going for your MBA in Finance? Those are a couple big names to know if you are.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

I read Bogle's book a long time ago, it was very enlightening, gave me a new perspective. Very short and to the point.

bk400 03-20-2025 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2504345)
I read Bogle's book a long time ago, it was very enlightening, gave me a new perspective. Very short and to the point.

+1. A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton Malkiel is also worth a read.

EddieP 03-20-2025 11:56 AM

If you want to get in the nitty gritty of evaluating and picking stocks then read “Security Analysis” by Benjamin Graham and “Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits” by Philip Fisher. Warren Buffett swears by these two books. Peter Lynch wrote a couple books back in the 1990s which also incorporate Graham’s and Fisher’s stock picking philosophies.Lynch’s books are easy reading.The Intelligent Investor by Graham is also worth reading.

Touch'EmAll 03-20-2025 12:08 PM

Books shmooks. All ya really need is B & B - Baseball cards and Bitcoin. Haha

Peter_Spaeth 03-20-2025 01:42 PM

I liked this book as well.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1455503304...d_asin_title_2

It's interesting, most people you talk to think of investing as picking individual stocks, but ain't necessarily so.

EddieP 03-21-2025 05:33 AM

Touch ‘em all: “ Books shmooks. All ya really need is B & B - Baseball cards and Bitcoin. Haha”


That’s perfectly reasonable. I wouldn’t be surprise if Wall Street is doing this right now. Classically when it doesn’t make sense to buy stocks, the Wall Street Bros would shift their money into bonds. Annette Thau’s The Bond Book is a good reference. When buying bonds or stocks don’t make sense then the Bros would shove the money into alternatives like land, metals, collectibles etc.

bk400 03-27-2025 05:52 PM

Well, anecdotally, I think prices are coming down now. I'm getting a lot of offers from sellers on eBay. Offers that are bringing the prices down below the most recent comps -- in some cases, quite significantly. It never made sense to me that baseball cards would somehow be immune to policy and economic uncertainty, and I think that's playing out now.

bk400 04-03-2025 10:23 PM

How are we feeling about the baseball card market now? I don't think I am being political by saying that we are all dealing with man-made volatility that no professional investor alive has ever managed through. In this environment, I'd have to imagine that you're better off as a buyer than a seller of cards -- that is, if you have the stones for it.

BobbyStrawberry 04-03-2025 10:31 PM

Prices for consumers going up, retirement accounts going down...I'm certainly not stocking up on card purchases.

Casey2296 04-03-2025 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2507589)
Prices for consumers going up, retirement accounts going down...I'm certainly not stocking up on card purchases.

-
Rare pre-war increasing in price, still a financial struggle to keep up with that market.
Entry points coming down on phenomenal American companies, what's not to like?

ValKehl 04-03-2025 11:09 PM

[QUOTE=Casey2296;2507591]-Entry points coming down on phenomenal American companies, what's not to like?[/QUOTE]

The hit to my S&P 500 mutual fund today, for starters!! :(

bk400 04-03-2025 11:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)
And a card for the thread. An American symbol of class, consistency, competence and excellence.

Casey2296 04-03-2025 11:30 PM

[QUOTE=ValKehl;2507595]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2507591)
-Entry points coming down on phenomenal American companies, what's not to like?[/QUOTE]

The hit to my S&P 500 mutual fund today, for starters!! :(

Time in the market Val not market timing. A great time to dollar cost average into the S&P, depending on your horizon. If it helps I would love to buy back my Shotwell back I traded you :-)

ValKehl 04-04-2025 09:06 AM

[QUOTE=Casey2296;2507598]
Quote:

Originally Posted by ValKehl (Post 2507595)
Time in the market Val not market timing. A great time to dollar cost average into the S&P, depending on your horizon. If it helps I would love to buy back my Shotwell back I traded you :-)

Hi Phil, hope all is going well for you. My wife and I have always followed your advice, as we have never been market timers. We follow the "Hold What You Got" advice found on the backs of many W502 cards. We held what we had during the 2007-09 recession, and our investments turned out okay. We are hoping for the same result once the recession/stagflation period we are now entering is over. We have been tempted to move $$ from our high-yield savings account into our S&P 500 fund when we thought the stock market had hit rock bottom, but we've never had the courage to take the plunge.

One of my collecting focuses is type cards. I'm especially partial to scarce type cards with neat advertising, such as the nice Shotwell Mfg. Co. card you traded me 2 years ago. But hey, you got my Western Playground type card which I still miss, and I doubt you care to offer it back to me.:) Tell you what, you come up with a Sam Rice card I need, especially a Witmor Candy with the vertical back, and you'll have your Shotwell back in a heartbeat! :D

Touch'EmAll 04-04-2025 09:52 AM

Love the '66 Aaron. Great card ! Thanks for posting.

oldjudge 04-04-2025 10:04 AM

I think collectibles may provide a safe haven for money coming out of the stock market.

raulus 04-04-2025 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ValKehl (Post 2507648)
We have been tempted to move $$ from our high-yield savings account into our S&P 500 fund when we thought the stock market had hit rock bottom, but we've never had the courage to take the plunge.

Maybe instead of moving over a gigantic chunk when you think the bottom has arrived, move smaller chunks over periodically. That way you don't get burned quite so badly if the "bottom" keeps moving down.

Or even just switch your allocation a bit. If you usually invest X every month, then ramp it up to 1.5X or 2X while the market seems to be down.

Although that might require allocating away from other stuff, like cardboard, in which case it might be more painful than we want to admit.

ValKehl 04-04-2025 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2507661)
Maybe instead of moving over a gigantic chunk when you think the bottom has arrived, move smaller chunks over periodically. That way you don't get burned quite so badly if the "bottom" keeps moving down.

Or even just switch your allocation a bit. If you usually invest X every month, then ramp it up to 1.5X or 2X while the market seems to be down.

Although that might require allocating away from other stuff, like cardboard, in which case it might be more painful than we want to admit.

Thanks, Nicolo, for your sound investing advice, which I believe is much the same as Phil's dollar-cost-averaging advice, which my wife subscribes to even more than I do. FYI, I am 81 and my wife is 72. We have been retired for many years, we are debt free and we live comfortably, but not extravagantly, on our Social Security benefits and my pension. Our investment income is reinvested, some automatically and some at our discretion; this is the only ongoing investing we are able to do. Fortunately, we've had no need yet to tap our investments, which we are hoping to be able leave to our kids, grandkids, and great grandkids.

Yoda 04-04-2025 11:36 AM

I think a good indicator as to whether there is a correlation between the stock market and card prices will be the closing tomorrow night of the LOTG auction. If card prices finish flat from their current levels, rather than soar in extended bidding, as per norm, it will be a reflection that the demand curve for vintage has paused, as people worry about their money.

raulus 04-04-2025 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ValKehl (Post 2507688)
Thanks, Nicolo, for your sound investing advice, which I believe is much the same as Phil's dollar-cost-averaging advice, which my wife subscribes to even more than I do. FYI, I am 81 and my wife is 72. We have been retired for many years, we are debt free and we live comfortably, but not extravagantly, on our Social Security benefits and my pension. Our investment income is reinvested, some automatically and some at our discretion; this is the only ongoing investing we are able to do. Fortunately, we've had no need yet to tap our investments, which we are hoping to be able leave to our kids, grandkids, and great grandkids.

Well, congrats on making it to this point!

Sounds like you're pretty much set, so you don't really need much by way of advice. But if I had any advice for someone in your situation, it would probably be to not sweat the market. No point in worrying about something you can't control, and probably doesn't really have much of an impact on you anyway.

ValKehl 04-04-2025 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2507695)
Well, congrats on making it to this point!

Sounds like you're pretty much set, so you don't really need much by way of advice. But if I had any advice for someone in your situation, it would probably be to not sweat the market. No point in worrying about something you can't control, and probably doesn't really have much of an impact on you anyway.

Leon, thanks for your kind comments and words of advice. I don't sweat the current market situation, even though I'm expecting a recession similar in scope to the one we had in 2007-09. Now then, if the coming recession escalates into a 1930's depression, then I may be sweating!

samosa4u 04-04-2025 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2503989)
Well, as the market seems to be continuing its march downward, we may find out soon enough whether or not the cardboard market is impacted by a bear market in US equities.

And I guess each of us will get to decide whether that makes a difference in how much we are personally willing to spend on cardboard.

Maybe this will get you Americans to stop driving card prices up to insane highs!!

150k for a freaking PSA 1.5 CJ Shoeless
30K for PSA 1 52T Mantles
20K for National Chicle Bronkos in poor condition
50K+ for shiny Wembanyama rookies

Just ridiculous ...

Exhibitman 04-04-2025 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 2507716)
Maybe this will get you Americans to stop driving card prices up to insane highs!!

150k for a freaking PSA 1.5 CJ Shoeless
30K for PSA 1 52T Mantles
20K for National Chicle Bronkos in poor condition
50K+ for shiny Wembanyama rookies

Just ridiculous ...

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that the people who paid those prices aren't sweating a bear market.

raulus 04-04-2025 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exhibitman (Post 2507766)
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that the people who paid those prices aren't sweating a bear market.

It's always fun to speculate. And you could definitely be right. Someone who can afford to drop 6 figures on a single piece of cardboard might have 8 or 9 figures sitting in a bank account somewhere, and so therefore they have plenty of cushion, and don't really care what happens to stocks.

On the other hand, they might be living a lot closer to the financial edge than we might assume.

Personally, I tend to go the other way, and assume that whoever is paying this much for cardboard must have lots of assets tied up in the stock market that could be taking a beating now, which might cause them to sweat pretty hard.

A lot of it tends to stem from my general assumption that humans tend to act irrationally and emotionally, and our cardboard purchases are no exception to that general rule, with people buying cards that are a stretch financially, potentially because they are irrationally exuberant about their future wealth because they believe that either their cardboard or their other investments will keep going up in perpetuity.

Peter_Spaeth 04-04-2025 06:50 PM

Obviously one size is not going to fit every person paying these sorts of prices, but I would guess the vast majority are the type Adam describes. I.e., people to whom the money really is beside the point.

samosa4u 04-04-2025 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2507769)

On the other hand, they might be living a lot closer to the financial edge than we might assume.

Personally, I tend to go the other way, and assume that whoever is paying this much for cardboard must have lots of assets tied up in the stock market that could be taking a beating now, which might cause them to sweat pretty hard.

A lot of it tends to stem from my general assumption that humans tend to act irrationally and emotionally, and our cardboard purchases are no exception to that general rule, with people buying cards that are a stretch financially, potentially because they are irrationally exuberant about their future wealth because they believe that either their cardboard or their other investments will keep going up in perpetuity.

Well said, Raul.

When the pandemic boom started, everybody assumed that it was the "super-rich" or the "guys on Wall Street" who were driving up prices. But when the bubble burst, those same people started to dump their cards, which hurt prices even more. These guys couldn't make their mortgage payments or pay their line of credit and in the end they got destroyed. So, nope ... not rich ... only stupid ...

guy3050 04-04-2025 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 2507716)
Maybe this will get you Americans to stop driving card prices up to insane highs!!

150k for a freaking PSA 1.5 CJ Shoeless
30K for PSA 1 52T Mantles
20K for National Chicle Bronkos in poor condition
50K+ for shiny Wembanyama rookies

Just ridiculous ...

I know for a fact that it’s a collector from Calgary Canada that bought the CJ Shoeless

cardsagain74 04-04-2025 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus (Post 2503612)
We’ll see what Jake has to say. But I would posit a few hypotheses:

1 - there are some real limits to the scale. At some point, the market becomes oversaturated with people writing call options, and not as many people buying them. That would cause the price to fall, which would wipe out your gains. So you can probably write calls for a few thousand shares, and maybe even tens of thousands, but once you’re writing millions or hundreds of millions, you’re going to move the market. And most sophisticated shops are investing at scale.

2 - this strategy probably works best with stocks where there is a lot of interest from individual investors. Think Tesla, or GameStop. Particularly when the good times are rolling and the “number go up” crowd is feeling its oats. In these cases, they’re hyper optimistic and will pay good money to buy the right to buy the stock in the future for a price that is well above today’s price. I’m guessing that those excessively exuberant individual investors essentially over-pay for this right because they have so much confidence in their prognostications.

3 - this strategy probably works best when the market is going up up up. Once sentiment turns more dour, particularly for those individual investors, the demand for these call options probably declines, so the market demand and price paid for the options will similarly decline.

Just spitballing here, but those would be my thoughts about why it’s difficult to replicate this strategy always and everywhere at maximum scale.

Plus there’s that tax issue I raised earlier, where income earned using this strategy is taxed heavily.

Not to mention the capital needed to write covered calls. And for options with small premiums relative to the underlying asset value, how the "income" from those premiums adds up so slowly.

Between this and expensive spreads in illiquid spots, commissions, etc....I've always guessed that in theory, options were a similar negative sum game (on both sides) for dart throwers. They're too overpriced to go long with a positive EV, yet all the extra costs and limitations with being short may be just as bad.

In the end, not much different than having to lay -110 on either side of a game in a sportsbook

toledo_mudhen 04-05-2025 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 2507716)
Maybe this will get you Americans to stop driving card prices up to insane highs!!

150k for a freaking PSA 1.5 CJ Shoeless
30K for PSA 1 52T Mantles
20K for National Chicle Bronkos in poor condition
50K+ for shiny Wembanyama rookies

Just ridiculous ...

O Canada..........................................

Americans do what they do because they can...........

Brian 04-05-2025 10:33 AM

After last week, I am going to change my vote from "no" to "yes." This is looking pretty ugly....

Exhibitman 04-05-2025 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samosa4u (Post 2507778)
Well said, Raul.

When the pandemic boom started, everybody assumed that it was the "super-rich" or the "guys on Wall Street" who were driving up prices. But when the bubble burst, those same people started to dump their cards, which hurt prices even more. These guys couldn't make their mortgage payments or pay their line of credit and in the end they got destroyed. So, nope ... not rich ... only stupid ...

Yes and no. The people who drove up the prices of cards with huge supplies react very differently than those who drove up the prices of rare cards. The former are much closer to commodities: abundant, in stock, continually offered for sale. Those kinds of items are sensitive to fluctuations because they are always available if you have the money, and people can and did plan their buying on a flipping model. If the market stalls out, they are left with a declining asset, and if they leveraged to get it, there will be blood in the marketplace when they sell. But a rare and desirable card will find its market and be hotly contested even as the rest falls, like all of the cards you listed. On the occasions when I've offered cards like that for sale, I stick to my price and I usually get it because I have no reason to negotiate.

Fred 04-05-2025 04:17 PM

Does anybody think that the recent market slide will affect bidding in the auctions that are active? Subconsciously?

raulus 04-05-2025 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred (Post 2507898)
Does anybody think that the recent market slide will affect bidding in the auctions that are active? Subconsciously?

Hard to imagine it induces bidders to be more aggressive. At best they might ignore it. Somewhere in the middle it might be a subconscious drag on those animal spirits driving people to bid like there’s no tomorrow. And on the other end, some bidders might deliberately pull back.

If the downdraft continues for a while and extends in intensity, it’s hard to imagine that it won’t have an effect.

Like most things in life, it’s a lot easier to identify once it’s happened. I guess we’ll see.

Casey2296 04-05-2025 05:21 PM

-
Yep, y'all stay away from the two lots I'm bidding on tonight please.
-

raulus 04-05-2025 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2507919)
-
Yep, y'all stay away from the two lots I'm bidding on tonight please.
-

I’ve had a few nice pickups of late at prices that I thought were a steal. Of course, our perception of what constitutes a steal has shifted over the last 5 years.

Always room to debate what was the trigger for any given outcome, of course. And just because I picked up a few nice deals doesn’t mean that there won’t be plenty that go the other way.

But maybe you’ll get lucky too.

Fred 04-05-2025 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2507919)
-
Yep, y'all stay away from the two lots I'm bidding on tonight please.
-

Which lots are those, so I can make sure to stay away from them? :p

Shoeless Moe 04-05-2025 06:25 PM

I watched 2 lots that I was in on last night blow past what I was going to bid tonight. I'm out, but happy to see people spending.

Market goes up & down. Unless you are retiring this month it should have ZERO impact on your spending.

SACK UP!

ValKehl 04-05-2025 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2507919)
-
Yep, y'all stay away from the two lots I'm bidding on tonight please.
-

I will, Phil, so long as you stay away from the one lot that I just gotta have! :)

Tyruscobb 04-05-2025 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe (Post 2507946)
Unless you are retiring this month it should have ZERO impact on your spending.

SACK UP!

I completely disagree. Individuals should curtail their spending and card budgets to further amass stock market money. This downturn is an opportunity…at least at some point. The stock market has minted more millionaires than baseball cards.

OhioLawyerF5 04-06-2025 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyruscobb (Post 2507996)
I completely disagree. Individuals should curtail their spending and card budgets to further amass stock market money. This downturn is an opportunity…at least at some point. The stock market has minted more millionaires than baseball cards.

Only if you are investing in cards. For collectors that doesn't matter.
Regardless of the market, if you are looking to invest, the stock market is better than cards. But if you have money for a hobby, investment isn't really the consideration.

Exhibitman 04-06-2025 09:29 AM

The Love of the Game results also were very strong; Al runs a helluva auction. I whiffed on every lot I was chasing and in most cases it wasn't close. Would've loved to get that Jackie Robinson ca. 1947 snapshot but at $4400+, my ceiling was more of a floor.

ruth-gehrig 04-06-2025 09:49 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Exhibitman (Post 2508044)
The Love of the Game results also were very strong; Al runs a helluva auction. I whiffed on every lot I was chasing and in most cases it wasn't close. Would've loved to get that Jackie Robinson ca. 1947 snapshot but at $4400+, my ceiling was more of a floor.

That was an awesome photo!!
The seller of the 1915 Ruth Team photo did well! Bought Summer 2023 LOTG $6k and sold last night for $140,000:eek:.

oldjudge 04-06-2025 11:56 AM

What did the write-up say in 2023? This is like that WWG DiMaggio in Goldin --amazing realization change.

oldjudge 04-06-2025 12:00 PM

Adam--Looking at 19th century material the LOTG realizations were so so at best. Old Judges did OK for the most part but some of the rest did very poorly relative to past realizations.

ruth-gehrig 04-06-2025 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 2508063)
What did the write-up say in 2023? This is like that WWG DiMaggio in Goldin --amazing realization change.

Well in 2023 it seems PSA labeled it a Type 3. It's now a Type 1

oldjudge 04-06-2025 12:30 PM

Again a grading company change results in a radically higher price. How could PSA go from a type 3 to a type 1 in their evaluation? I know nothing about photos but if graders can't tell the difference between a type 3 and a type 1 why would collectors pay such a premium for the latter?

raulus 04-06-2025 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruth-gehrig (Post 2508065)
Well in 2023 it seems PSA labeled it a Type 3. It's now a Type 1

I guess that explains the meteoric rise in a couple of years.

Peter_Spaeth 04-06-2025 03:43 PM

There is an explanation in the auction itself.

Please note: this very example previously sold in our Summer, 2023 Premier Auction and was encapsulated as a Type III photo at that time. Over one year later a second example of this photo, with identical embedded editing, surfaced in the hobby which PSA determined to be a Type I photo. That photo ultimately sold elsewhere in September, 2024 in excess of $85,000. PSA then updated their opinion on the offered example, determining the embedded editing within both images is, in fact, a result of application to the original negative itself and not present due to use of a copy negative. A full LOA from PSA is included with this photo noting the critical distinction.

oldjudge 04-06-2025 03:55 PM

Yes, Al did a great job explaining it.

todeen 04-06-2025 09:44 PM

Futures closed in Asia, and Monday looks like it's going to be a tough day of selling. And NYT indicates that EU is preparing retaliatory tarifs.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Peter_Spaeth 04-06-2025 09:59 PM

Time to panic!!!!!!

BobbyStrawberry 04-06-2025 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2508213)
Time to panic!!!!!!

Time to sit back and bask in the chaos!

todeen 04-06-2025 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2508213)
Time to panic!!!!!!

No panic for me. I'm only 39. I'm just hoping I can catch a few months of deflated prices to make my monthly contribution go farther in my chosen index funds.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Peter_Spaeth 04-06-2025 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2508227)
No panic for me. I'm only 39. I'm just hoping I can catch a few months of deflated prices to make my monthly contribution go farther in my chosen index funds.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

That's probably the best way to look at these things.

bk400 04-07-2025 12:01 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Here's another card for the thread. The Kid played clean, played hard, and was beloved in both Canada and New York.

tireolddawg 04-07-2025 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2503871)
From everything I have read and learned from people in the business, thinking you can time the market, or beat it over the long term with your individual stock picks, is a fool's errand for the vast majority of people.

The late Jim Simons is laughing in his grave.

egri 04-07-2025 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2508227)
No panic for me. I'm only 39. I'm just hoping I can catch a few months of deflated prices to make my monthly contribution go farther in my chosen index funds.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Same, I guess it's fortuitous that I was outbid on the card I wanted in Heritage; I redeoployed some of those savings to my brokerage account over the weekend.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.