|
Anderson
Sammy:
The Anderson WAS the card I was questioning. For some reason this thread posts replies at the very end, leaving all to wonder what the question was about. I appreciate the answer. Thanks. |
1 Attachment(s)
Haven't been this sick from missing out on an eBay buy-it-now in quite a while, it sold for $8 + $3 shipping. It's bad enough that it had three yellow name variations, look at the card on the bottom row...
|
Pryor
The 80 set sure has a bunch of print defects. For Pryor ( I have a Doug Bair like it) I have one of the no names, plus the position in both white and yellow. For the yellow names, which despite early notoriety are just print defects, I have Braun, Stanley,Washington, Wathan, McEnaney, and Poquette. I haved a Trammel with a yellow halo around his name. Only Wathan, Stanley, Braun and Poquete, along with Pryor, made it into SCD. Anyone else have other yellow names ? I have lots of banner and other print defects in my set
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...variations.jpg http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...psa0a7d5b9.jpg |
1961 topps variation
1 Attachment(s)
1961 Dodgers Southpaws back variations with green ink bleeding in the corner
|
1961 #332 Dotterer
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a new wrinkle on this one.
|
1957 Topps Slightly Off-Center
http://imagehost.vendio.com/a/204295...SKUTTS_NEW.JPG
....In order to build a complete but decently-centered 1957 Topps set several years ago , I wound up buying several large collections and a few partial sets in order to cut down on the eventual cost......these are among the worst backs I culled , and I'm offering them for your viewing pleasure.....enjoy... ..neat thing about the Walker Cooper card : no space left for any comments after posting his major league statistics.....only card in the set like that....the Ted Williams card would have been the same except that they compressed the stats for "1943-1945" into one line , commenting on his military service... . |
1957
Maybe because of DPs, but even on correctly cut 57s you can find the same card with different relationships between the baseball stitching and the numbers on the back. For example on one card the stitching may touch or even protrude into the number but on a different card of the same player there is a gap between the stitching and the number. I don't have an example currently scanned but picked up a couple after sliphorn here on the board pointed some out to me.
sliphorn, like saved and Cliff, needs more diversions in his life :-) |
The relation between the number and stitching is probably a registration thing.
Not that it couldn't be different, and considering Topps attention to detail probably is. The place to look would be the relation of the number to the rest of the red. If it's located differently there it's not registration. * Steve B *Ok, it could technically be registration IF Topps printed the numbers and the rest of the red separately. No reason they would, and I've never seen any thing to make me think they did, but ....it IS Topps :D |
Quote:
|
Two More Anomalies
2 Attachment(s)
The 1964 #76 has a small vertical line to the left of #44 and this is the common as I have seen 10 with it and just this one without the line.
The 1964 #13 Phillies team has many of these cards with this line kind of faded out at the lower left. They are all over the place on eBay and COMC. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:33 AM. |