Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Show...me...your print variations! (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=187722)

ALR-bishop 01-21-2016 08:54 AM

1970
 
Claude--It looks to be the common version, it may be harder to find one without it

benlee66 01-21-2016 09:58 AM

5 Attachment(s)
some of my vintage oddities.

1. Mathews with white streak over shoulder
2. Killebrew w/flame to the left of his cap
3. Maris w/print shift: red in team banner
4. Trammell missing a lot of color
5. Munson RC that got no yellow print on obverse

ALR-bishop 01-21-2016 10:02 AM

Munson
 
Ben---do you think the Munson resulted from light exposure ?

benlee66 01-21-2016 10:03 AM

5 Attachment(s)
1. reverse of Munson RCs (my guess is the back went through the yellow inking twice, hence none on the front)
2. Schmidt obverse
3. Schmidt no name on back, greened out
4. Richard obverse
5. similar to the Schmidt, and was found in the same small collection

ALR-bishop 01-21-2016 10:11 AM

Schmidt
 
Neat Schmidt card

benlee66 01-21-2016 10:18 AM

5 Attachment(s)
1. Seaver with pink dot on color
2. another '76 green bleed back
3. Brett with a bruise on forehead (lefthand card). Maybe something like the '73 Kaline band-aid (wishful thinking)?
4. Menke reverse, card on right has small circle below the 1963 at the end of the text box and just above the top of the stat border.
5. Earl Campbell RC with ink blotch (i'm fairly confident it's a printing flaw and not after market damage)

benlee66 01-21-2016 10:28 AM

1 Attachment(s)
A better scan of the back of the Munson with no yellow on front. Lots of yellow on back.

I don't think it's sun-faded. Everything is crisp. Wish I could post a higher resolution scan.

benlee66 01-21-2016 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop (Post 1494222)
Neat Schmidt card

It's the neatest error/variation I've come across. How lucky that it was on Schmidt and not a common!?!

ALR-bishop 01-21-2016 10:44 AM

More back isues
 
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img311.jpg

http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img367.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img026.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img164.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img215.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img305.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img384.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...ps6b627868.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...ps56e5eaff.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...ps7b8b3a31.jpg
http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/...539/img251.jpg

bnorth 01-21-2016 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALR-bishop (Post 1494219)
Ben---do you think the Munson resulted from light exposure ?

No experience with 70 Topps but from the picture I would say yes it is faded. The card looks dull and the magenta does not pop with color. Real missing color cards are super rare. I have a couple pictured in the 80-Present January pick up thread. Those are not 100% missing color but the yellow ink was running very low. Notice how all the colors still pop even with the bad phone picture. In one of the Hank Aaron threads I pictured a amazing missing yellow Clemente that really shows the difference between real and faded.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.