I thought you said they were older.

Bob must be lost or bored if he ended up in a variations thread

Liking the 63 offset error that was posted above.

As likely Ben's competition for offset errors (lol) I have several hundred and the extreme ones are always my favorites.

Here is a neat one I just picked up last week that is a double exposed George Burke Stamp. The first I have run across of these...

https://img.comc.com/i/Baseball/1968...&size=original
1968 Topps - [Base] #179 - Bill Stoneman
Courtesy of COMC.com

Red burlap at the bottom of this Stoneman; multiple copies on COMC this way, so pretty common.

1960 De Lock
 

It looks like PacMan ate part of the ball. I wonder how this happened.

I got one of the buybacks in this year's Heritage of this set and it has the red line on it also.

Wtf?
 

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2914/3...41255383_b.jpg

Anyone here know what the hell this is?

Bump
 

Bump, found picture

Looks like the sheet got snagged and ripped in the middle of the printing process.

Except black is last, and the inside of the cardboard is usually dark like the back. A peel of the surface is possible, but would be pretty crazy. Usually the entire surfaced side pulls away. I'm thinking a solvent spill that eventually dried. That would keep the colors from printing, and mostly dried would give the fuzzy look to the black layer at that corner.

Pretty cool card no matter how it happened.

Steve B