I am leaning hard in this direction also. Rick

There was a debate on here not too long ago about its merits and I agree with most on here that it was a VZ company who just took Topps photos and made their own cards. Also, it seems weird that Topps would come out with a '67 set after doing it bi-yearly for the previous 6 years, and then introduced another set in '68. It doesn't add up. And not as important as the other two reasons, I've been watching VZs on eBay for a year now and I've only ever seen one Braves card and that's the Rico Carty, which I already have, and that's only been listed a handful of times. I think if they were made by Topps they'd be more prevalent; or as prevalent as all the other VZs.

My latest pick-up.

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...a953b3d80f.jpg


Joshua Van Pelt

Wow! A PSA 6 Venz is like a PSA 11 from regular 62 Topps!

rare stamps count, right? :)

http://caimages.collectors.com/psaim...venezuelan.jpghttp://caimages.collectors.com/psaim...uelan.back.jpg

70 Venezuelan album
 

I purchased a 70 album with 277 of the 300 cards in it. Album is in real bad shape but the cards are real nice. It doesn't have the cover but the person I bought it from has another in his collection so he made me a copy to put with the album. Point being topps or any kind of logo not on the album which doesn't sound like topps. Back to if the 70 set isn't topps then to me the 67 set isn't either. Is there an expert here on venes that can confirm 67's not topps.

Cover
 

Cover

Nobody can definitively confirm that they are or aren't Topps, but I don't think they're Topps. There's just too many oddities about the set that I don't trust.

My most recent Venz pickups. The back of the Wilhelm is completely clean.

http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/...lm%20front.jpg
http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/...0Ven%20268.jpg
http://i1199.photobucket.com/albums/...JTartabull.jpg

Dan, great cards!