![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Thought
I thought ya'll might enjoy these. Are these common? Any tougher then the rest? Thanks, Pat
http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4333/3...4b6700cc_b.jpg http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4336/3...65bb82ec_b.jpg |
very nice! Most are massive overinking, not all that common.
The 58 is the most severe batch of fisheyes I've seen. The 74 Spencer is about as far off as a factory cut gets for tilt. I have a 75 that's way worse, but the person I got it from later said they made it from a scrap of uncut sheet. |
I have a very similar looking 79 Schmidt card. While not the same as the card you picture, I have two (nearly identical) over-inked copies each of 3-4 different 79 Topps FB cards. IMO, 1979 was one of Topps' worst years for over-inking....I do not recall previous or subsequent years being nearly as bad as '79 in regards to the over-inking.
I have yet to see a 70 Topps Kilkenny with color in the card's# circle ....while he has not seen a copy himself, Richard D's variation list hints there may be a copy with color in the # circle. |
Quote:
|
|
I didn't see this mentioned, but 1948 Bowman Enos Slaughter RC:
https://img.comc.com/i/Baseball/1948...zoom&side=back https://img.comc.com/i/Baseball/1948...zoom&side=back #1 in 17 either has a tail or doesn't. Recurring print variation. |
Good one, John
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 AM. |