Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   AL Wild Card Scenarios (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=308671)

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 08:12 AM

AL Wild Card Scenarios
 
How incredible is it that there could be a four way tie?
https://www.mlb.com/news/american-le...kers-explained

SteveS 10-03-2021 08:24 AM

As a Dodger fan, I'm looking at that scenario. In no way do I believe in or advocate throwing games, but if the Dodgers win and the Giants lose, they end up in a tie and a one-game extension of the season in San Francisco to decide the division winner. The loser of that game will host the Wild-Card game. The Dodgers' starting staff isn't in the best shape right now. Seems as though it would be better for them to just go straight to the Wild-Card and not have to play an extra game that wouldn't provide that great a benefit if they win, and puts a big strain on the pitching staff either way.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150391)
As a Dodger fan, I'm looking at that scenario. In no way do I believe in or advocate throwing games, but if the Dodgers win and the Giants lose, they end up in a tie and a one-game extension of the season in San Francisco to decide the division winner. The loser of that game will host the Wild-Card game. The Dodgers' starting staff isn't in the best shape right now. Seems as though it would be better for them to just go straight to the Wild-Card and not have to play an extra game that wouldn't provide that great a benefit if they win, and puts a big strain on the pitching staff either way.

At least you aren't looking at having to pitch Kershaw with the season on the line.:o

irv 10-03-2021 08:33 AM

Go JAYS!

bxb 10-03-2021 08:35 AM

Regarding the AL, although it is fun to imagine the different wild card scenarios, it is likely irrelevant, as whoever emerges will likely be trounced by Tampa in the first round.

Jcosta19 10-03-2021 08:42 AM

I think the most overlooked part of all this craziness is that the AL East already has four 90 win teams, despite having to play each other.
Only time in divisional era that has ever happened was 1978 AL East (which had 7 teams) and a heck of a play in game.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

frankbmd 10-03-2021 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bxb (Post 2150397)
Regarding the AL, although it is fun to imagine the different wild card scenarios, it is likely irrelevant, as whoever emerges will likely be trounced by Tampa in the first round.

Deuces wild indeed with a four way playoff.

Arozarena can't wait for his post-season grand slam.

frankbmd 10-03-2021 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jcosta19 (Post 2150399)
I think the most overlooked part of all this craziness is that the AL East already has four 90 win teams, despite having to play each other.
Only time in divisional era that has ever happened was 1978 AL East (which had 7 teams) and a heck of a play in game.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

The Orioles helped out a lot.:D

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 08:59 AM

If my math is correct, with 4 games today, that means there are 16 possible combinations of winners. What's above my head without going through all 16 is how many of those combinations result in 2, 3, and 4 team ties.

frankbmd 10-03-2021 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150405)
If my math is correct, with 4 games today, that means there are 16 possible combinations of winners. What's above my head without going through all 16 is how many of those combinations result in 2, 3, and 4 team ties.

Wait 12 hours Peter and you will not have to figure anything.

Twelve is a smaller number than 16, so you should be able to handle it.:p

I'd give you the answer you want, but I'm busy prepping for the Packer game.:D

By the way Kershaw finished with 10 wins, so he is an elite starting pitcher.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 09:30 AM

Your math is not correct :confused:

1 game can only have 2 different outcomes, hence 4 games can only have 8 different outcomes?

Only 1 scenario can have a four team playoff: Both Boston & NY would have to lose, and both Seattle & Toronto would have to win

The only way a 3 team playoff can occur is if again both Seattle & Toronto win, and either Boston or NY lose

Go Mariners !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ve been following this Cinderella all season




Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150405)
If my math is correct, with 4 games today, that means there are 16 possible combinations of winners. What's above my head without going through all 16 is how many of those combinations result in 2, 3, and 4 team ties.


frankbmd 10-03-2021 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150409)
Your math is not correct :confused:

1 game can only have 2 different outcomes, hence 4 games can only have 8 different outcomes?

Only 1 scenario can have a four team playoff: Both Boston & NY would have to lose, and both Seattle & Toronto would have to win

The only way a 3 team playoff can occur is if again both Seattle & Toronto win, and either Boston or NY lose

Go FISH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ve been following this Cinderella all season

There is also more than one possibility for a 2 team playoff for the second wild card.

And if NY and BOS both lose and TOR and SEA both win, there is a 1/16 chance of a four team playoff.

Jason 10-03-2021 09:41 AM

That's why baseball is the best sport. So intriguing on so many levels.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150409)
Your math is not correct :confused:

1 game can only have 2 different outcomes, hence 4 games can only have 8 different outcomes?

Only 1 scenario can have a four team playoff: Both Boston & NY would have to lose, and both Seattle & Toronto would have to win

The only way a 3 team playoff can occur is if again both Seattle & Toronto win, and either Boston or NY lose

Go FISH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I’ve been following this Cinderella all season

No, if each game has two possible outcomes, the total number of outcomes is 2 times 2 times 2 times 2. You multiply, not add.

You're also wrong about 3 team playoff scenarios. Suppose Seattle wins and the rest lose. Seattle, Boston, and NY are then tied. Same if only Toronto wins.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 09:52 AM

If Boston and NY both win, the rest is irrelevant, two team playoff. I think that happens 1 in 4 times. Plus, if all 4 teams lose, two team playoff. 1 in 16 odds of that. So 5 in 16 of a two team Boston NY playoff.

1 in 16 of a 4 way tie.

But now it gets more complicated. Suppose NY OR Boston wins but not both, and both Seattle and Toronto win. All four teams get in, one clear winner and three way tie for the second wild card spot, and you now need TWO play in games just to get to the wild card game LOL.

Or, if NY OR Boston wins but not both, and Seattle OR Toronto wins but not both, you have one clear winner and a two way tie for the second wild card spot.

Or, if NY and Boston both lose, and Seattle OR Toronto wins but not both, you have a three way tie for first.

This is insane.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 09:57 AM

Yes, you are right in the 3 way, I forgot the both lose, one win scenario




Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150413)
No, if each game has two possible outcomes, the total number of outcomes is 2 times 2 times 2 times 2. You multiply, not add.

You're also wrong about 3 team playoff scenarios. Suppose Seattle wins and the rest lose. Seattle, Boston, and NY are then tied. Same if only Toronto wins.


Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150415)
Yes, you are right in the 3 way, I forgot the both lose, one win scenario

Enough to make one's head spin.

Casey2296 10-03-2021 10:04 AM

Giants win today and they break the single season win record for any SF/NY team beating John McGraws 1904 106 win season.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 10:05 AM

This is fun, but I’m getting confused, haha

I’m now counting 17 different combinations that could happen. That doesn’t seem like a logical # to me, but please tell me where I am mis-counting

All could win
All could lose
There are 4 combos were 1 team wins, the other 3 lose
There are 4 combos were 1 team loses, the other 3 win

That’s 10 different combos so far

I’m getting confused trying to add the 2 win 2 lose combos:
I’m counting 7 different ways that could happen as follows:

Tor & Sea Win
Tor & NY Win
Tor & Bos Win
Sea & NY Win
Sea & Bos Win
NY & Bos Win

HAHA, never mind, thats only six,

YES HEAD SPINNING

frankbmd 10-03-2021 10:13 AM

Two other possibilities exist for 2022.

1. Just have the AL East start the season with a four team wild card playoff and go directly into the wild games. Why play 162 games to get into a one game playoff.

or

2. Just have the AL East play their entire schedule as double headers. With a 324 game season the chances of wild card ties would be reduced, not eliminated but less likely.

I don't know how to resolve the inevitable law suit between Seattle and Baltimore though.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2150418)
Giants win today and they break the single season win record for any SF/NY team beating John McGraws 1904 106 win season.

This is an American League thread, son.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 10:18 AM

So to recap (I think)

There could be a four way tie for the top wild card spot.
There could be a four team playoff with three teams tied for the second wild card spot, requiring a total of three games to sort out. How awesome would this be.
There could be a three team playoff with two teams tied for the second wild card spot.
There could be a simple wild card game.

conor912 10-03-2021 10:26 AM

Even more wild is that all 4 teams play at 3pm et today. If ever there was a reason for a split tv, today would be it. If MLB was smart they’d broadcast all 4 for free to suck fans into the post season. While a Boston fan, I’d love to see Seattle pull through.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 10:30 AM

Yes, us National Leaguers need to just stay quiet, but on this note:

Go Giants!!!! I’m a Rockies fan and really just hate the Doodies (Dodgers)



Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150426)
This is an American League thread, son.


Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 10:59 AM

From one of the math geniuses on Blowout.

Probability of any sort of play-in game: 56.25%

Two-way tie for the second WC spots: 25%

Three-way tie for the two WC spots: 12.5%

Three-way tie for the second WC spot: 12.5%

Four way tie for the two WC spots: 6.25%

This gives no consideration to today's matchups.

New York -155
Seattle -180
Boston -210
Toronto -420

nineunder71 10-03-2021 11:05 AM

That totals 113% chance of something happening, I’ll assume he’s right

:D


Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150446)
From one of the math geniuses on Blowout.

Probability of any sort of play-in game: 56.25%

Two-way tie for the second WC spots: 25%

Three-way tie for the two WC spots: 12.5%

Three-way tie for the second WC spot: 12.5%

Four way tie for the two WC spots: 6.25%

This gives no consideration to today's matchups.

New York -155
Seattle -180
Boston -210
Toronto -420


nineunder71 10-03-2021 11:07 AM

I’m just gonna stop while I’m behind, never mind

At least I’m having fun, anyone got a participation award :(

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150447)
That totals 113% chance of something happening, I’ll assume he’s right

:D


perezfan 10-03-2021 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150446)
From one of the math geniuses on Blowout.

Probability of any sort of play-in game: 56.25%

Two-way tie for the second WC spots: 25%

Three-way tie for the two WC spots: 12.5%

Three-way tie for the second WC spot: 12.5%

Four way tie for the two WC spots: 6.25%

This gives no consideration to today's matchups.

New York -155
Seattle -180
Boston -210
Toronto -420

I know that 4-team parlays are very tough to hit, but I wouldn't be surprised if they all win today. I just pray that the M's can find a way to sneak in. It's just been soooooooo damn long. :o

rats60 10-03-2021 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150391)
As a Dodger fan, I'm looking at that scenario. In no way do I believe in or advocate throwing games, but if the Dodgers win and the Giants lose, they end up in a tie and a one-game extension of the season in San Francisco to decide the division winner. The loser of that game will host the Wild-Card game. The Dodgers' starting staff isn't in the best shape right now. Seems as though it would be better for them to just go straight to the Wild-Card and not have to play an extra game that wouldn't provide that great a benefit if they win, and puts a big strain on the pitching staff either way.

Ok, I am confused. How is a playoff game to advance to the NLDS and have home field through the playoffs worse than a wild card game against the Cardinals to advance to the NLDS and never getting home field?

nineunder71 10-03-2021 11:52 AM

Clearly, all this excitement has clouded some of our brains :p




Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60 (Post 2150455)
Ok, I am confused. How is a playoff game to advance to the NLDS and have home field through the playoffs worse than a wild card game against the Cardinals to advance to the NLDS and never getting home field?


SteveS 10-03-2021 12:22 PM

rats60, the Dodgers' starting staff is a bit shot. Kershaw is out. Urias pitched last night. Buehler may or may not start today. If he does and the Dodgers win and the Giants lose, that leaves Scherzer for the tiebreaker, and he stunk it up in his last two outings. I just don't like the chances in that road game. If I were managing the Dodgers (and I have no idea why they never promoted me from souvenir stand salesman to manager in 1985), I would make today a bullpen game. Still try to win, of course. But if Scherzer has to start the tiebreaker, that would leave Buehler ready for the Wild-Card. Obviously it's better to win the division as you said, but I'm pessimistic about that happening.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 12:35 PM

Your pessimistic thoughts are right on que!

The division win streak will end, and then Arenado, a SoCal boy, will ‘rake’ you guys right on back to Beverly Hills where you can enjoy a beautiful winter retreat….it really is nice there!

U heard it here first!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150461)
rats60, the Dodgers' starting staff is a bit shot. Kershaw is out. Urias pitched last night. Buehler may or may not start today. If he does and the Dodgers win and the Giants lose, that leaves Scherzer for the tiebreaker, and he stunk it up in his last two outings. I just don't like the chances in that road game. If I were managing the Dodgers (and I have no idea why they never promoted me from souvenir stand salesman to manager in 1985), I would make today a bullpen game. Still try to win, of course. But if Scherzer has to start the tiebreaker, that would leave Buehler ready for the Wild-Card. Obviously it's better to win the division as you said, but I'm pessimistic about that happening.


Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150461)
rats60, the Dodgers' starting staff is a bit shot. Kershaw is out. Urias pitched last night. Buehler may or may not start today. If he does and the Dodgers win and the Giants lose, that leaves Scherzer for the tiebreaker, and he stunk it up in his last two outings. I just don't like the chances in that road game. If I were managing the Dodgers (and I have no idea why they never promoted me from souvenir stand salesman to manager in 1985), I would make today a bullpen game. Still try to win, of course. But if Scherzer has to start the tiebreaker, that would leave Buehler ready for the Wild-Card. Obviously it's better to win the division as you said, but I'm pessimistic about that happening.

How quickly things change in baseball. A week ago we would have said the Dodger starting rotation was invincible -- imagine, a 20 game winner as arguably only your fourth best pitcher behind two first ballot HOFers and a youngster on his way to superstardom.

SteveS 10-03-2021 12:57 PM

Colton, I agree that the division streak is likely over, but in the postseason the Giants will get a one-way ticket back to the Tenderloin. I'm just happy that after all that money-spending and cockiness, the Padres finished out of the money.

Peter, Urias has been the best pitcher all season. He deserves the Cy Young, but most likely won't get it. If wins don't count anymore, just award the World Series to the team with the lowest ERA or highest WAR and we won't have to worry about any of this playoff math.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150469)
Colton, I agree that the division streak is likely over, but in the postseason the Giants will get a one-way ticket back to the Tenderloin. I'm just happy that after all that money-spending and cockiness, the Padres finished out of the money.

Peter, Urias has been the best pitcher all season. He deserves the Cy Young, but most likely won't get it. If wins don't count anymore, just award the World Series to the team with the lowest ERA or highest WAR and we won't have to worry about any of this playoff math.

Isn't Urias allowing half a run per game more than Buehler and Scherzer? IMO that matters more than wins which depend on externalities.

Casey2296 10-03-2021 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150426)
This is an American League thread, son.

Ha! That’s the league with the batter that doesn’t play a position, correct?

SteveS 10-03-2021 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150470)
Isn't Urias allowing half a run per game more than Buehler and Scherzer? IMO that matters more than wins which depend on externalities.

He won the most games, which is what matters most. As I said, they don't award the World Series to the team with the lowest ERA.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2150471)
Ha! That’s the league with the batter that doesn’t play a position, correct?

Exactly. The league where one batter in nine isn't essentially an automatic out. :eek:

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150472)
He's also winning more games, which is what matters most.

We disagree then on the importance of wins as a statistic for an individual pitcher. Suppose Scherzer loses a 1-0 game and Urias wins a 5-3 game. Would you really say Urias was better? Not I.

egri 10-03-2021 01:17 PM

While the Red Sox have already surpassed my expectations for them this season, if they do get in, it will be a short October for them. The pitching isn't deep enough, and their defense isn't doing them any favors.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 01:21 PM

Yes, Urias was your stud last year in the playoffs, along with May. However, Urias will not be this year’s Cy Young winner, as u stated, and for good reason, there are better options

I’m also happy that the Friars are out in this manner!

However, WINS do matter, as these giants have shown all year, no need to go to WAR & ERA, just win the games if you are the better team, which They have been!



Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150469)
Colton, I agree that the division streak is likely over, but in the postseason the Giants will get a one-way ticket back to the Tenderloin. I'm just happy that after all that money-spending and cockiness, the Padres finished out of the money.

Peter, Urias has been the best pitcher all season. He deserves the Cy Young, but most likely won't get it. If wins don't count anymore, just award the World Series to the team with the lowest ERA or highest WAR and we won't have to worry about any of this playoff math.


mrreality68 10-03-2021 01:23 PM

Let the Race begin

All Teams are out of the starting gate

Let’s see where we end up in a few hours

bmattioli 10-03-2021 01:25 PM

Between Football and the Redsox I have 4 games on watching this all unfold.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by egri (Post 2150477)
While the Red Sox have already surpassed my expectations for them this season, if they do get in, it will be a short October for them. The pitching isn't deep enough, and their defense isn't doing them any favors.

I agree with your reasoning but I have not lost hope, short series, a few guys get hot and a few opponents get cold, and presto.

egri 10-03-2021 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150484)
I agree with your reasoning but I have not lost hope, short series, a few guys get hot and a few opponents get cold, and presto.

Peter, I hope you're right.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 01:39 PM

Again, Go Fish!!


Quote:

Originally Posted by egri (Post 2150485)
Peter, I hope you're right.


rugbymarine 10-03-2021 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2150418)
Giants win today and they break the single season win record for any SF/NY team beating John McGraws 1904 106 win season.

Every thread needs a card, right?

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...96c6b61a_c.jpg

SteveS 10-03-2021 02:15 PM

Quick story about my experience in a season finale. I played for Venice High School. In the last regular-season game of my senior year, we needed to beat Palisades to get into the playoffs. We were losing by three going into the bottom of the seventh (the games were seven Innings). We loaded the bases, and Pali brought their third baseman to the mound to relieve. First batter he faced hit a walk-off grand slam for the win and postseason berth. Who was that Pali player who served it up? Some guy named Steve Kerr. Wonder whatever became of him.

Casey2296 10-03-2021 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150473)
Exactly. The league where one batter in nine isn't essentially an automatic out. :eek:

Giants pitcher Logan Webb just hit a two run shot to increase their lead 9-1.

JollyElm 10-03-2021 03:00 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 481426

“It was my understanding that there would be no math.”

jayshum 10-03-2021 03:34 PM

Assuming Toronto can hold a 10 run lead against the team with the worst record in the AL with 3 innings to go, there will be 8 possible outcomes with 6 of them resulting in some kind of tie-breaker.

rats60 10-03-2021 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150458)
Clearly, all this excitement has clouded some of our brains :p

No it is because what he says makes no sense. He wants to concede the division to his hated rivals to play the Cards in the WC. He should want to beat the Giants to make them play another game and get the winner in LA. Aren't the Dodgers defending champions with 105 wins going into the last game? He acts like they are lucky to have a winning record.

I guess it doesn't matter. The Padres are tanking to the Giants just like 1971. The Dodgers hate the Giants, but everyone else in the Division hates the Dodgers.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2150508)
Giants pitcher Logan Webb just hit a two run shot to increase their lead 9-1.

Until today his BA was .096. Watching him bat must be an exciting time.

Casey2296 10-03-2021 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150526)
Until today his BA was .096. Watching him bat must be an exciting time.

Webb has scored as many runs today as the entire Boston Red Sox team has in their game...

nineunder71 10-03-2021 03:58 PM

Yes, This!


Quote:

Originally Posted by JollyElm (Post 2150513)
Attachment 481426

“It was my understanding that there would be no math.”


BobbyStrawberry 10-03-2021 04:16 PM

And now Mariners and Jays fans become Nationals fans for the next hour...

jayshum 10-03-2021 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2150538)
And now Mariners and Jays fans become Nationals fans for the next hour...

Unless Seattle can score some runs, it won't matter to them what the Nationals do.

BobbyStrawberry 10-03-2021 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayshum (Post 2150540)
Unless Seattle can score some runs, it won't matter to them what the Nationals do.

Edit - Yes. Mariners also need to win.

SteveS 10-03-2021 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60 (Post 2150525)
No it is because what he says makes no sense. He wants to concede the division to his hated rivals to play the Cards in the WC. He should want to beat the Giants to make them play another game and get the winner in LA. Aren't the Dodgers defending champions with 105 wins going into the last game? He acts like they are lucky to have a winning record.

I guess it doesn't matter. The Padres are tanking to the Giants just like 1971. The Dodgers hate the Giants, but everyone else in the Division hates the Dodgers.

It's pretty obvious that I'd want the Dodgers to beat the Giants. But you made my point for me in your second paragraph. I don't think anybody who follows baseball thought that the Padres would give it their all today. It was pretty clear that the Giants were going to win the division no matter what the Dodgers did. So why not save Buehler, who has been on a roll recently, for Wednesday? Scherzer is obviously no slouch, but he has pitched horribly lately and is mediocre in the postseason (7-5).

As for Urias, I'd award the CY to his 20-3/2.96 over any of the other contenders by a mile.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2150531)
Webb has scored as many runs today as the entire Boston Red Sox team has in their game...

Check again bro.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 04:36 PM

Damn that Devers


Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveS (Post 2150543)
It's pretty obvious that I'd want the Dodgers to beat the Giants. But you made my point for me in your second paragraph. I don't think anybody who follows baseball thought that the Padres would give it their all today. It was pretty clear that the Giants were going to win the division no matter what the Dodgers did. So why not save Buehler, who has been on a roll recently, for Wednesday? Scherzer is obviously no slouch, but he has pitched horribly lately and is mediocre in the postseason (7-5).

As for Urias, I'd award the CY to his 20-3/2.96 over any of the other contenders by a mile.


BobbyStrawberry 10-03-2021 04:37 PM

NYY@BOS should be fun.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 04:37 PM

Sorry, didn’t mean to quote you On that last comment

nineunder71 10-03-2021 04:39 PM

Agreed, but not as fun as Cards @ Doodies for us NL folk

Go Arenado!!


QUOTE=BobbyStrawberry;2150548]NYY@BOS should be fun.[/QUOTE]

BobbyStrawberry 10-03-2021 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150552)
Agreed, but not as fun as Cards @ Doodies for us NL folk

Go Arenado!!

That one should be fun too. I am happy for Arenado. (And anyone who gets out of COL, honestly)

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 04:44 PM

Fear the Wainwright.
Doesn't seem right that a team with 100 wins is out if they lose one game, but such is baseball.

judsonhamlin 10-03-2021 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150484)
I agree with your reasoning but I have not lost hope, short series, a few guys get hot and a few opponents get cold, and presto.

I admire your optimism but decades of being a Sox fan tell me otherwise. I would also note that there is way too much math here. I went to law school to avoid maths other that .1 or .25 for billing purposes and have even avoided that for the last twenty four years

jayshum 10-03-2021 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150557)
Fear the Wainwright.
Doesn't seem right that a team with 100 wins is out if they lose one game, but such is baseball.

Just win your division and then you don't have that problem. If there was still just one wild card, then the Giants and Dodgers would have had little motivation to play hard down to the wire since winning the division wouldn't get you much more than being the wild card would. Home field advantage would be about it.

mrreality68 10-03-2021 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nineunder71 (Post 2150552)
Agreed, but not as fun as Cards @ Doodies for us NL folk

Go Arenado!!


QUOTE=BobbyStrawberry;2150548]NYY@BOS should be fun.

[/QUOTE]

Both wild card match ups should be fun.

Just amazing that a 106 game winning team is in the wild card game.

jayshum 10-03-2021 05:09 PM

Unfortunately, no tie breakers needed.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 05:11 PM

For you easterners, it’s kinda like the Pats missing the playoffs with 11 wins, remember that? Shit happens in all sports, go Cards!!

106 wins & watching the playoffs next round from Beverly Hills

Wain will be Right




QUOTE=mrreality68;2150562][/QUOTE]

Both wild card match ups should be fun.

Just amazing that a 106 game winning team is in the wild card game.[/QUOTE]

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayshum (Post 2150560)
Just win your division and then you don't have that problem. If there was still just one wild card, then the Giants and Dodgers would have had little motivation to play hard down to the wire since winning the division wouldn't get you much more than being the wild card would. Home field advantage would be about it.

Right but then one of them wouldn't be facing single elimination.

nineunder71 10-03-2021 05:34 PM

If ands and buts were candy and nuts…………

We’d all have a merry Hanukkah

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150568)
Right but then one of them wouldn't be facing single elimination.


jayshum 10-03-2021 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150568)
Right but then one of them wouldn't be facing single elimination.

True, but I think one of the main reasons they added the second wild card (aside from more tv money) was to reward teams for winning their division and to provide incentive to do so.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayshum (Post 2150579)
True, but I think one of the main reasons they added the second wild card (aside from more tv money) was to reward teams for winning their division and to provide incentive to do so.

I doubt that, I think it had much more to do with making scenarios like today possible, where more teams remain in contention until the very end.

jayshum 10-03-2021 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150581)
I doubt that, I think it had much more to do with making scenarios like today possible, where more teams remain in contention until the very end.

Keeping more teams in contention was part of it as well, but there were definitely seasons when there was just one wild card that teams didn't play for the division at the end so they could rest players or get their pitchers lined up for the playoffs because the only difference between winning the division vs the wild card spot was one home game in a series. Having to play a single elimination game now with two wild card teams makes winning the division much more worthwhile.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayshum (Post 2150607)
Keeping more teams in contention was part of it as well, but there were definitely seasons when there was just one wild card that teams didn't play for the division at the end so they could rest players or get their pitchers lined up for the playoffs because the only difference between winning the division vs the wild card spot was one home game in a series. Having to play a single elimination game now with two wild card teams makes winning the division much more worthwhile.

One home game in a best of five series is a pretty big deal, no?

rats60 10-03-2021 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2150581)
I doubt that, I think it had much more to do with making scenarios like today possible, where more teams remain in contention until the very end.

It definitely was that. With 1 Wild Card 5/17 or 29.4% won the World Series. That meant that a Wild Card team had a better chance to win than a division winner. Since they changed, it has dropped to 2/9 or 22.2%, now division winners are winning at a higher rate because of that one game. I understand these are small samples, but it is all we have. There definitely was lots of complaints about how many Wild Card teams were winning before they added the second team.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2021 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60 (Post 2150642)
It definitely was that. With 1 Wild Card 5/17 or 29.4% won the World Series. That meant that a Wild Card team had a better chance to win than a division winner. Since they changed, it has dropped to 2/9 or 22.2%, now division winners are winning at a higher rate because of that one game. I understand these are small samples, but it is all we have. There definitely was lots of complaints about how many Wild Card teams were winning before they added the second team.

OK but seems a stretch to me. The only explanation I can come up with is that sometimes the worse of the two wild card teams is winning the one game playoff and is not as likely to win going forward, but it still seems like small sample size.

Snowman 10-04-2021 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrreality68 (Post 2150562)

Both wild card match ups should be fun.

Just amazing that a 106 game winning team is in the wild card game.

Yet another reason why people often say "baseball is all luck". The Dodgers were the best team in baseball this season (and by a sizeable margin as well). They have an SRS of 1.6 vs the Giants 1.2, which is a better predictor of playoff success than is total wins or even Pythagorean wins (and they had 109 PWs vs the Giants 101). Yet, here they are in a one-game playoff just for a shot at a series against the inferior Giants (albeit with a slightly better record).

Here's an interesting and relevant excerpt from The Drunkard's Walk that I often reference when discussing statistical probabilities in baseball with my friends...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leonard Mlodinow
…if one team is good enough to warrant beating another in 55% of its games, the weaker team will nevertheless win a 7-game series about 4 times out of 10. And if the superior team could beat its opponent, on average, 2 out of 3 times they meet, the inferior team will still win a 7-game series about once every 5 match-ups. There is really no way for a sports league to change this. In the lopsided 2/3-probability case, for example, you’d have to play a series consisting of at minimum the best of 23 games to determine the winner with what is called statistical significance, meaning the weaker team would be crowned champion 5 percent or less of the time. And in the case of one team’s having only a 55-45 edge, the shortest significant “world series” would be the best of 269 games, a tedious endeavor indeed! So sports playoff series can be fun and exciting, but being crowned “world champion” is not a reliable indication that a team is actually the best one. (p. 70-71)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 AM.