Net54baseball.com Forums - The Ohtani 50 50 ball -- lawsuit to stop Goldin Auction
Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   The Ohtani 50 50 ball -- lawsuit to stop Goldin Auction (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=353644)

Peter_Spaeth 09-26-2024 07:43 PM

The Ohtani 50 50 ball -- lawsuit to stop Goldin Auction
 
Please delete if already posted. Plaintiff claims consignor stole the ball from him after he gained possession.

https://sports.yahoo.com/fan-claimin...195832628.html

BobbyStrawberry 09-26-2024 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2463735)
Please delete if already posted. Plaintiff claims consignor stole the ball from him after he gained possession.

https://sports.yahoo.com/fan-claimin...195832628.html

It's hard to see the exact moment of "possession" from those videos, but clearly Belanski wrestled it away from Matus.

oldjudge 09-26-2024 08:12 PM

"Belanski put his “arm in between his legs and wrangled the 50/50 Ball out "

He's just lucky Belanski got the right ball

Peter_Spaeth 09-26-2024 08:15 PM

Update.
https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/...ani-50-50-ball

Peter_Spaeth 09-26-2024 08:21 PM

This reminds me so much of the fictionalized Bobby Thomson home run ball arm wrestling scene under the seat in Dom Delillo's Underworld (Pafko at the Wall).

Peter_Spaeth 09-26-2024 08:23 PM

Had the game been in LA, the Dodger staff probably would have locked the guy in a room with no food or bathroom until he traded the ball for an autographed photo.

campyfan39 09-26-2024 08:25 PM

If someone did rip the ball out of an 18-year-olds hand, that's some crap

Peter_Spaeth 09-26-2024 08:30 PM

Full evidentiary hearing October 10, which is before the auction ends. A settlement between Matus and Belanski would not surprise me, obviously there will be plenty of money to go around.

todeen 09-26-2024 11:42 PM

I watched the film, and you can see the 18yo visibly upset losing the ball. I'm not sure what precedent there is, but I vaguely remember other lawsuits like this previously. Was it for a McGwire ball, or Bonds?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

seanofjapan 09-27-2024 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2463772)
I watched the film, and you can see the 18yo visibly upset losing the ball. I'm not sure what precedent there is, but I vaguely emerge other lawsuits like this previously. Was it for a McGwire ball, or Bonds?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

It was the Bonds ball. Popov v. Hayashi - the judge split ownership of the ball between the first guy to lay hands on it (but immediately got it knocked away by a pile of fans tackling him) and the guy who ended up with it after picking it up off the floor while everyone else was squishing the firsy guy.

todeen 09-27-2024 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanofjapan (Post 2463789)
It was the Bonds ball. Popov v. Hayashi - the judge split ownership of the ball between the first guy to lay hands on it (but immediately got it knocked away by a pile of fans tackling him) and the guy who ended up with it after picking it up off the floor while everyone else was squishing the firsy guy.

Thank you. I hope this kids lawyer knows precedent.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

rats60 09-27-2024 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2463792)
Thank you. I hope this kids lawyer knows precedent.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

With the Bonds ball, the plaintiff was wearing a baseball glove and caught the ball in his glove. The people around him knocked the ball out of his glove and the defendant ended up in possession of the ball.

Here no one caught the ball, it was loose on the ground and the parties were fighting to gain posssession of it.

Keith H. Thompson 09-27-2024 12:03 PM

Won't there be somehing about
 
"possession being 9/10 of the law?" I've always thought that strong arm methods, beating up small kids, and martial tactics are just part of the game. And you have to be there in person to appreciate it. One game at Fenway years ago vs the Yankees in the seventies, my small son, about 10 years ago, upon exiting via a rooftop spied a ball near the edge, perhaps a foul ignored during the game. As he literally had it in his hand, a grown man pushed him over on his head and took it away from him. It was dangerous. The man disappeared, but I was furious and complained to management by mail. They mailed me two baseballs for which we were grateful. I also recall that Phil Rizutto was an onlooker and sympathized with my son which took all of the sting out of it. It wasn't an official exit, sort of player's exit.

steve B 09-27-2024 12:24 PM

Three games to go, and he's at 53/56

Yeah , a super long shot, but I'm sort of rooting for him to get to 60/60 and complicate things a bit.

calvindog 09-27-2024 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 2463863)
Three games to go, and he's at 53/56

Yeah , a super long shot, but I'm sort of rooting for him to get to 60/60 and complicate things a bit.

If he ends up at 53 HR isn’t that ball more valuable? That *is* the record.

darwinbulldog 09-27-2024 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 2463875)
If he ends up at 53 HR isn’t that ball more valuable? That *is* the record.

What record? Most home runs by a player with 56 or more stolen bases?

todeen 09-27-2024 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60 (Post 2463839)
With the Bonds ball, the plaintiff was wearing a baseball glove and caught the ball in his glove. The people around him knocked the ball out of his glove and the defendant ended up in possession of the ball.



Here no one caught the ball, it was loose on the ground and the parties were fighting to gain posssession of it.

The way I see the video, the 18yo is the first person in the camera view, and is standing in the location the ball lands after bouncing off the sign. He is the first person there until others run in to make the dog pile, including the man who comes away with the ball. The 18yo bends over to grab the ball and is unable to stand up with the ball because he is stuck, most likely by the man who comes away with the ball. I think it is very possible the judge will see it this way to as long as the boys lawyer is a convincing story teller.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Mark17 09-27-2024 01:44 PM

This thread reads like Cris Collinsworth calling the play by play on a fumble.
"When did the ball come out? Did the first guy have full possession with a knee on the ground?"

Peter_Spaeth 09-27-2024 01:48 PM

If this is the only video evidence, I think it doesn't tell a conclusive story that Matus had possession of the ball for however long it takes to establish that Belanski actually took it away from him. The judge would also have to believe his testimony. This ball will sell for so much that the parties should compromise this and not risk walking away with nothing, IMO.

darwinbulldog 09-27-2024 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2463885)
If this is the only video evidence, I think it doesn't tell a conclusive story that Matus had possession of the ball for however long it takes to establish that Belanski actually took it away from him. The judge would also have to believe his testimony. This ball will sell for so much that the parties should compromise this and not risk walking away with nothing, IMO.

If the judge is wise, he will call them both into chambers and offer to have the ball cut down the middle, giving half of it to each of them, and astutely deduce from their reactions who is the true owner.

D. Bergin 09-27-2024 02:10 PM


I don’t know man. 18 year old looked like maybe the 3rd person in there. Certainly not conclusive.

Can’t throw a winning lottery ticket into a crowd and expect people to be civil.

oldjudge 09-27-2024 02:19 PM

I must admit that I don’t see the beauty of owning a baseball like this(it looks like any other baseball) but, that said, it is easier to see the appeal of an unbroken record ball, like Barry Bonds’ 73rd HR ball. This ball is the 50/50 ball. Isn’t the 51/50 ball or the 52/56 ball even better?

Vintagedeputy 09-27-2024 02:31 PM

I watched the video a couple of times and I believe the 18-year-old kid in the red Miami shirt had the ball in his hand, and the guy on the ground was holding his arm and applying enough force to wrench the ball from him.

Peter_Spaeth 09-27-2024 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 2463896)
I must admit that I don’t see the beauty of owning a baseball like this(it looks like any other baseball) but, that said, it is easier to see the appeal of an unbroken record ball, like Barry Bonds’ 73rd HR ball. This ball is the 50/50 ball. Isn’t the 51/50 ball or the 52/56 ball even better?

I would think not, it's the milestone that matters.

JollyElm 09-27-2024 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darwinbulldog (Post 2463888)
If the judge is wise, he will call them both into chambers and offer to have the ball cut down the middle, giving half of it to each of them, and astutely deduce from their reactions who is the true owner.

LOL. Had the same thought, so I looked up the Seinfeld episode where Newman (as an homage to the Judgement of Solomon story from the Hebrew Bible) suggested cutting the bike in half, so both Elaine and Kramer could have equal shares, and Kramer's outraged reaction to harming the bike proved he should be the rightful owner. Funny stuff.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wsbgwNe4Rv4?si=Xb1shpkfmZh4ZvNa" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Fred 09-27-2024 04:21 PM

I couldn't tell what happened in the scrum. Perhaps they need to send the footage to New York for a review (frame by frame). At the end of the video, you would see the kid mouthing "fffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuucccccccckkkkkk".

If that guy used physical force to rip it out of the kids hand, would that be battery?

What would be even funnier is if the stadium security took the person with the ball to a location to provide "authentication of the ball" and then pull a switch and giving the person another game used ball.

I wonder if Ohtani's ex-interpreter had a bet that he'd homer in that at bat?

Peter_Spaeth 09-27-2024 04:49 PM

In the opening chapter of Underworld, there's a scrum under the seats for the Thomson ball, and it's the older (white) guy who gets to it first. Then the younger (black) kid gives his wrist an "Indian burn" and grabs it from him. The non-violent encounter between the two afterwards, which carries on to the edge of Harlem, is epic. And here we now have the scene, in real life.

Vintagedeputy 09-27-2024 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred (Post 2463924)
If that guy used physical force to rip it out of the kids hand, would that be battery?

From what I could tell, yes, If they each had a hand on the ball and it was a tug-of-war, that would be one thing. This looks like the kid had his hand on the ball, and the man on the ground had his legs around the kids arm, crushing it, and then wrenched the ball from him.

Again, very difficult to see exactly what happened, but the kid’s reaction certainly seemed like he believed he had possession of the ball and it was taken from him.

todeen 09-28-2024 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 2463884)
This thread reads like Cris Collinsworth calling the play by play on a fumble.

"When did the ball come out? Did the first guy have full possession with a knee on the ground?"

this is very funny! who's the best play by play announcer you'd want to hear from calling the action in court?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Mark17 09-28-2024 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2464067)
this is very funny! who's the best play by play announcer you'd want to hear from calling the action in court?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

It would be a great comedy skit to have John Madden calling it. "The first guy has it, then BOOM! The second guy comes in and DOINK! hits him on the head..."

todeen 09-28-2024 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark17 (Post 2464069)
It would be a great comedy skit to have John Madden calling it. "The first guy has it, then BOOM! The second guy comes in and DOINK! hits him on the head..."

I forgot all about Madden! Great choice

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Aquarian Sports Cards 09-28-2024 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2464067)
this is very funny! who's the best play by play announcer you'd want to hear from calling the action in court?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Joe Buck...

...said nobody, ever.

h2oya311 09-28-2024 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by todeen (Post 2464074)
I forgot all about Madden! Great choice

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Every time I hear “boom”, I always have to finish by saying…”tough actin’ Tinactin!” Now my 7 year-old daughter does it too…lol

oldjudge 09-29-2024 08:36 AM

I believe Ohtani is one HR from 55/55. Certainly, that trumps 50/50 and would take a lot of the shine off that 50/50 ball.

SyrNy1960 09-29-2024 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 2464179)
I believe Ohtani is one HR from 55/55. Certainly, that trumps 50/50 and would take a lot of the shine off that 50/50 ball.

Agree! I would want the most recent ball (55/55) than the 50/50 that was the first 50/50.

Peter_Spaeth 09-29-2024 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SyrNy1960 (Post 2464186)
Agree! I would want the most recent ball (55/55) than the 50/50 that was the first 50/50.

Did both McGwire 62 and 70 sell publicly?

oldjudge 09-29-2024 10:16 AM

Yah, how they doing now? 🤣

Peter_Spaeth 09-29-2024 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 2464200)
Yah, how they doing now? 🤣

LOL. Just wondering which sold for more, as an analogy.

rats60 09-29-2024 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2464197)
Did both McGwire 62 and 70 sell publicly?

70 sold for 3 million dollars, the most ever paid for a HR ball. 62 was caught by a Cardinals groundskeeper who gave the ball to McGwire.

oldjudge 09-30-2024 10:45 AM

I wonder what that 70 ball is worth today

Peter_Spaeth 09-30-2024 09:09 PM

LOL the plot thickens.

https://sports.yahoo.com/does-shohei...190249763.html

BobbyStrawberry 09-30-2024 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2464662)

Which guy is he in the videos?

Peter_Spaeth 09-30-2024 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2464665)
Which guy is he in the videos?

I think it was earlier, he had the ball, it was knocked away then rolled to where Matus and Belanski tangled? He says.

BobbyStrawberry 09-30-2024 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2464667)
I think it was earlier, he had the ball, it was knocked away then rolled to where Matus and Belanski tangled? He says.

Oh, wow. This could take awhile to sort out.

todeen 09-30-2024 10:48 PM

Here is a view, once the green shirt guy misses it the second time, the first person in the frame on the ground is the 18 yo Matus.
https://youtube.com/shorts/C-QLPZ4DJ...JWkc3Wy1CU3xTb

I don't see a striped shirt guy as the first or second guy in multiple videos. I wonder what video he is providing? the first video on Twitter I saw has not been posted on YouTube. Or it's been buried by influencer videos.

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Peter_Spaeth 09-30-2024 11:14 PM

LOL WTF. This guy is full of it.

Video footage from the stands shows Davidov, wearing a blue-and-white striped shirt, smiling and shaking Belanski's hand after the latter man had secured the ball. Workman attributed that action to "the adrenaline, the historic moment."

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ESMoqp5_o00

Brendan 10-01-2024 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fred (Post 2463924)
If that guy used physical force to rip it out of the kids hand, would that be battery?

It alleges so in the lawsuit.

I think the kid gets a settlement. He has a good lawyer and video evidence supports his claims.

tiger8mush 10-01-2024 07:37 AM

Should the courts allow Goldin to run the auction to establish the value of the ball?

packs 10-01-2024 10:06 AM

I find it hard to understand why the auction would be allowed to proceed. If the 18 year old wins the suit and is awarded possession, it's not up to anyone but him as to whether or not he sells the ball.

Peter_Spaeth 10-01-2024 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2464765)
I find it hard to understand why the auction would be allowed to proceed. If the 18 year old wins the suit and is awarded possession, it's not up to anyone but him as to whether or not he sells the ball.

Or is his claim for money damages for having his property taken from him?

packs 10-01-2024 10:35 AM

But would he need to be awarded damages if he's awarded possession of the ball? I just don't see how Goldin, who doesn't own the ball in any way, can decide unilaterally that it will sell a ball whose ownership is in question. How can the consignment agreement stand if the consignor is said not to own the ball?

If I put myself in the position of the 18 year old fighting for ownership, if I'm awarded the ball and am declared the ball's rightful owner because it was stolen from me, I don't know what it would take to rectify things with me from Goldin. Money wouldn't be the issue. It would feel like the ball was stolen from me twice and I never had any agency in a situation where I own something.

Peter_Spaeth 10-01-2024 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2464772)
But would he need to be awarded damages if he's awarded possession of the ball? I just don't see how Goldin, who doesn't own the ball in any way, can decide unilaterally that it will sell a ball whose ownership is in question. How can the consignment agreement stand if the consignor is said not to own the ball?

If I put myself in the position of the 18 year old fighting for ownership, if I'm awarded the ball and am declared the ball's rightful owner because it was stolen from me, I don't know what it would take to rectify things with me from Goldin. Money wouldn't be the issue.

The next step in the case is a preliminary injunction hearing. The judge probably won't decide who owns the ball, just whether the kid has demonstrated enough likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm to stop the auction. I assume as to irreparable harm he will make the argument you articulate, that the ball is unique and at the end of the day, if he wins, money damages won't make him whole. I haven't researched Florida law on remedies so this is just off general principles.

steve B 10-02-2024 11:19 AM

Entirely out of curiosity, and knowing the answer might not be out there.

How do lawyers take these cases? Paid? or contingency?

Seems like it's very iffy all around.

And of course, it's only worth much of anything as a milestone ball. The 12th hr by a guy likely to end up with 12 in his career isn't any big deal except to the person that catches it.

Peter_Spaeth 10-02-2024 11:33 AM

I assume Matus' lawyer is on contingency. What's iffy about it?

kcohen 10-03-2024 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith H. Thompson (Post 2463854)
"possession being 9/10 of the law?" I've always thought that strong arm methods, beating up small kids, and martial tactics are just part of the game. And you have to be there in person to appreciate it. One game at Fenway years ago vs the Yankees in the seventies, my small son, about 10 years ago, upon exiting via a rooftop spied a ball near the edge, perhaps a foul ignored during the game. As he literally had it in his hand, a grown man pushed him over on his head and took it away from him. It was dangerous. The man disappeared, but I was furious and complained to management by mail. They mailed me two baseballs for which we were grateful. I also recall that Phil Rizutto was an onlooker and sympathized with my son which took all of the sting out of it. It wasn't an official exit, sort of player's exit.


The reminded me of something like this I saw a few years back. Like most people would, I find an adult strong-arming a kid out of a ball beyond repugnant. I'm not a lawyer, but I think such an act would constitute battery. I was at a game in Baltimore sitting near first base, when this happened. Onlookers cussed the guy out but he didn't care. This was basically a mugging. The first base umpire, having caught the episode out of the corner of his eye, came over after the inning ended and handed a ball to the kid.

It restored my faith in umpires. Well sorta.

D. Bergin 10-03-2024 12:55 PM

Ok, I guess I'm going to be the one a*@hole to say this.

18 year-olds were drafted to go to Vietnam and I have a cousin who signed up for the Marines and was sent to Afghanistan at that age.

18 year-olds are playing Division 1 College Sports all over this country, and many are competing on a high level.

I've run into plenty of 18 year olds I would not want to get into a fist fight with because I would most assuredly lose.

Not sure if the guy doing the strong-arming for the lottery ticket randomly thrown into the crowd was supposed to check birth certificates before diving under bleacher seats for a ball.

I to have seen adults act like an ass at Minor League games chasing a worthless ball, although most will just turn around and hand it to the nearest kid anyways.

You can bet though, if that ball had a bank account number on it, which unlocked a key to a 7 figure payday, those adults wouldn't be so quick to hand the ball over to the nearest doe eyed kid they could find.

Maybe I was the only one thinking this throughout the course of this thread...or I'm the only one to admit it. :D:D

packs 10-03-2024 01:02 PM

I don't know how much age factors into other people's opinions on this behavior, but I tend to think if you have to rip something out of someone's hand to take possession of it, you didn't catch the baseball.

vintagerookies51 10-03-2024 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Bergin (Post 2465373)
Ok, I guess I'm going to be the one a*@hole to say this.

18 year-olds were drafted to go to Vietnam and I have a cousin who signed up for the Marines and was sent to Afghanistan at that age.

18 year-olds are playing Division 1 College Sports all over this country, and many are competing on a high level.

I've run into plenty of 18 year olds I would not want to get into a fist fight with because I would most assuredly lose.

Not sure if the guy doing the strong-arming for the lottery ticket randomly thrown into the crowd was supposed to check birth certificates before diving under bleacher seats for a ball.

I to have seen adults act like an ass at Minor League games chasing a worthless ball, although most will just turn around and hand it to the nearest kid anyways.

You can bet though, if that ball had a bank account number on it, which unlocked a key to a 7 figure payday, those adults wouldn't be so quick to hand the ball over to the nearest doe eyed kid they could find.

Maybe I was the only one thinking this throughout the course of this thread...or I'm the only one to admit it. :D:D

I'm gonna have to kinda agree with this. None of the videos I saw showed that the 18 year old ever even had a hand on the ball. For all we know the guy who ended up with the ball had it the whole time. People are acting like he straight up stole it from a 9 year old. To call this battery seems extreme, but if there is a video I'm missing please post it

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2024 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D. Bergin (Post 2465373)
Ok, I guess I'm going to be the one a*@hole to say this.

18 year-olds were drafted to go to Vietnam and I have a cousin who signed up for the Marines and was sent to Afghanistan at that age.

18 year-olds are playing Division 1 College Sports all over this country, and many are competing on a high level.

I've run into plenty of 18 year olds I would not want to get into a fist fight with because I would most assuredly lose.

Not sure if the guy doing the strong-arming for the lottery ticket randomly thrown into the crowd was supposed to check birth certificates before diving under bleacher seats for a ball.

I to have seen adults act like an ass at Minor League games chasing a worthless ball, although most will just turn around and hand it to the nearest kid anyways.

You can bet though, if that ball had a bank account number on it, which unlocked a key to a 7 figure payday, those adults wouldn't be so quick to hand the ball over to the nearest doe eyed kid they could find.

Maybe I was the only one thinking this throughout the course of this thread...or I'm the only one to admit it. :D:D

Right but not really the point. The issue is whether the kid had possession or not. If he did, their ages, physiques, personality traits, etc. are irrelevant to his claim of ownership. That said, given the nature of a scrum for a loose ball, I'm not sure a split second grab is enough.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2024 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcohen (Post 2465320)
The reminded me of something like this I saw a few years back. Like most people would, I find an adult strong-arming a kid out of a ball beyond repugnant. I'm not a lawyer, but I think such an act would constitute battery. I was at a game in Baltimore sitting near first base, when this happened. Onlookers cussed the guy out but he didn't care. This was basically a mugging. The first base umpire, having caught the episode out of the corner of his eye, came over after the inning ended and handed a ball to the kid.

It restored my faith in umpires. Well sorta.

The complaint does contain a count for battery, related to trapping the kid's arm.

Exhibitman 10-03-2024 02:09 PM

I once caught the drumstick at a George Thorogood and the Destroyers concert and was in basically the same sort of scrum. I just went down and covered up like I had a fumble recovery and came away with the stick when the dust settled. I think I threw it away later, so there's that. Far more fun was being at the foot of the stage at the end of the show and getting to shake hands with the band.

The court will sort it out, but if it emerges that the guy pinned down the other guy's arm and pried the ball out of his hand, well, where I was born, we called that "getting mugged." I give the 18 y.o. credit for self-restraint. I know me at 18 would probably have ended up in cuffs for assault; I did once get into a fight in the street with a would-be mugger. 92nd Street between West End and Riverside in NYC. I was a kid. I got so mad when the bigger kid who was mugging me insisted that I turn out my pockets that I threw punches instead. I got the worst of it in the end, but I kept my money. Today, the old fart me would have been too busy ducking to avoid getting hit by the ball and the pouncing people to even get into the scrum. Young me, not so much.

How long will it be until two or three guys square up and really punch it out over a ball?

And while I am spewing random thoughts on this, a reason why 50 is better than 55 may be round number bias. It's the 50/50 club, not the 55/56 club.

D. Bergin 10-03-2024 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2465374)
I don't know how much age factors into other people's opinions on this behavior, but I tend to think if you have to rip something out of someone's hand to take possession of it, you didn't catch the baseball.

I don't know. I watched the videos, but I didn't see ANYBODY "catch" a baseball.

Either two men come out of that scrum, one hand firmly planted on each side of the baseball, singing kumbaya, and pledging to split the proceeds of the windfall, while setting 10% aside to start a non-profit cat rescue...or one of them "rips" it out of the others hand, and claims singular ownership of the ball. Don't see how else that plays out.

Now, that said, my feeling is, they'll have to sell, and split the proceeds (with their lawyers) when it comes down to it.

The other guy who filed suit, is out of luck unless video surfaces that shows exactly what he claims happened, actually happened.

packs 10-03-2024 02:23 PM

I agree. I think the most likely outcome is split ownership and split proceeds.

The NFL says a man who goes down in possession of the ball is in possession of the ball regardless of who stands up with it.

D. Bergin 10-03-2024 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 2465403)
I agree. I think the most likely outcome is split ownership and split proceeds.

The NFL says a man who goes down in possession of the ball is in possession of the ball regardless of who stands up with it.


Assuming they can actually tell who's in possession of it. Many a football has changed "ownership" at the bottom of a pile.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2024 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exhibitman (Post 2465396)
I once caught the drumstick at a George Thorogood and the Destroyers concert and was in basically the same sort of scrum. I just went down and covered up like I had a fumble recovery and came away with the stick when the dust settled. I think I threw it away later, so there's that. Far more fun was being at the foot of the stage at the end of the show and getting to shake hands with the band.

The court will sort it out, but if it emerges that the guy pinned down the other guy's arm and pried the ball out of his hand, well, where I was born, we called that "getting mugged." I give the 18 y.o. credit for self-restraint. I know me at 18 would probably have ended up in cuffs for assault; I did once get into a fight in the street with a would-be mugger. 92nd Street between West End and Riverside in NYC. I was a kid. I got so mad when the bigger kid who was mugging me insisted that I turn out my pockets that I threw punches instead. I got the worst of it in the end, but I kept my money. Today, the old fart me would have been too busy ducking to avoid getting hit by the ball and the pouncing people to even get into the scrum. Young me, not so much.

How long will it be until two or three guys square up and really punch it out over a ball?

And while I am spewing random thoughts on this, a reason why 50 is better than 55 may be round number bias. It's the 50/50 club, not the 55/56 club.

Yeah, a scrum like that is no place for old men. In the end, unless this kid really wants the ball not the money, there's more than enough here that it would be rational to split it. The new claimant, the one smiling and high fiving Belanski at the end, fuck him.

prestigecollectibles 10-03-2024 03:48 PM

Second fan files lawsuit claiming ownership of Shohei Ohtani’s 50-50 baseball
https://apnews.com/article/shohei-oh...8d7efb87319ad0

Smarti5051 10-03-2024 04:15 PM

Seems like with three individuals all claiming ownership of the baseball and no clear way to determine who actually possessed it first, the judge should ask for the ball to be tendered to the bailiff whereupon it will be cut into three equal pieces and 1/3rd distributed to each plaintiff. Or, better yet, have the bailiff throw the three pieces on the ground and they can reenact the wrestling match.

As an aside, I must be getting old, because watching the video of the kid with one hand uselessly gripping his phone while a $4 million ball is supposedly in his other hand is beyond stupid. Did you learn nothing in little league? When fielding a ball, ALWAYS use two hands! In addition, if I was 18 and a grown man was at my waste trying to wrestle my ball away, my "free" elbow is plowing into his nose. I can't think the medical bills plus pain and suffering would be more than the value of the ball, even if my defense of property and self failed in court.

Peter_Spaeth 10-03-2024 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smarti5051 (Post 2465447)
Seems like with three individuals all claiming ownership of the baseball and no clear way to determine who actually possessed it first, the judge should ask for the ball to be tendered to the bailiff whereupon it will be cut into three equal pieces and 1/3rd distributed to each plaintiff. Or, better yet, have the bailiff throw the three pieces on the ground and they can reenact the wrestling match.

As an aside, I must be getting old, because watching the video of the kid with one hand uselessly gripping his phone while a $4 million ball is supposedly in his other hand is beyond stupid. Did you learn nothing in little league? When fielding a ball, ALWAYS use two hands! In addition, if I was 18 and a grown man was at my waste trying to wrestle my ball away, my "free" elbow is plowing into his nose. I can't think the medical bills plus pain and suffering would be more than the value of the ball, even if my defense of property and self failed in court.

When is the last time you saw an 18 year old put down a device?

Pat R 10-03-2024 05:28 PM

I think any historic ball, puck, etc ... like this should go back to the player to be auctioned off with the proceeds going to the charity of his/her choice and it would avoid all of this nonsense.

In the second video in Peters original post it clearly shows that although the 18 year old was the first person to run towards the ball the ball rolled away from him. You can see it rolling off the table diagonally towards the lower left hand corner in the video.

drcy 10-03-2024 05:37 PM

IMO, the video proves nothing.

BobbyStrawberry 10-03-2024 08:36 PM

New article with some expert opinions:

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/...es-dodgers-mlb

steve B 10-04-2024 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2465029)
I assume Matus' lawyer is on contingency. What's iffy about it?

I just strikes me as something that's more of a 50/50 thing. Not sure where the line gets drawn between contingency and "I need $X up front"

Peter_Spaeth 10-04-2024 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve B (Post 2465604)
I just strikes me as something that's more of a 50/50 thing. Not sure where the line gets drawn between contingency and "I need $X up front"

Entirely up to the lawyer and client how the lawyer gets paid. Contingency fees can make sense for both parties in a lot of cases.

ullmandds 10-04-2024 12:28 PM

im guessing if original posessor of this ball agreed to terms with the dodgers and made a trade...these 2 other claimants would've never come forward...additionally...if original posessor of the ball didn't bring it to market so soon with such a high price tag...these 2 claimants would've never come forward.

Balticfox 10-04-2024 12:43 PM

Truth! It's all about the money. So it's ultimately the fans/collectors/people who are willing to pay the nosebleed prices for such memorabilia who are to "blame" for these legal brouhahas. Plus the lawyers of course.

And no, I won't be among the bidders in any auction for this ball.

:(

Peter_Spaeth 10-10-2024 04:48 PM

By agreement, the preliminary injunction hearing is canceled, and the auction will continue. I infer that means the proceeds will be kept in escrow and barring a settlement, the court will later conduct a trial to determine entitlement. So much for any romantic notion the kid really wanted the ball, I guess.

jingram058 10-10-2024 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2466847)
By agreement, the preliminary injunction hearing is canceled, and the auction will continue. I infer that means the proceeds will be kept in escrow and barring a settlement, the court will later conduct a trial to determine entitlement. So much for any romantic notion the kid really wanted the ball, I guess.

Wow. How lame is that.

Peter_Spaeth 10-10-2024 05:26 PM

Once it sells for some absurd amount, I bet these guys reach an allocation rather than rolling the dice.

Peter_Spaeth 10-22-2024 09:48 AM

2.1 million current bid, ends tonight.

jayshum 10-22-2024 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 2469280)
2.1 million current bid, ends tonight.

Don't forget the 22% BP so it's really at $2,562,000


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 AM.