CFP - Comments?
1-Alabama
2-Clemson 3-Ohio State 4-Washington 'also-rans': Penn State; Michigan; Wisconsin; Oklahoma from what the 'paid' analysts said - one thought Conference Championships would mean more and Ohio State would drop out replaced by Penn State; the rest agree with what the committee decided. Other than that, I did not hear anyone saying Michigan, Wisconsin or Oklahoma should be in. Penn State has a nice fallback position - The Rose Bowl What do you think? Did They Get it Right? bma |
Exactly how I thought it should be. Right teams, good matchups, good order.
|
Quote:
I kind of look at those as a sort of a mini elimination process. |
Quote:
PSU was really only competing against Washington and they came up short. Perhaps PSU should have played the 1st half like they did the 2nd against Wisconsin. Or been competitive against Michigan. Or not lost to a 4 loss Pitt team. In the end, there was too many holes in PSU's resume to make the playoffs. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 AM. |