Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   19th century cards (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=302673)

GaryPassamonte 05-28-2021 10:01 AM

19th century cards
 
I just did a quick glance at the May pick up thread and found only two 19th century cards in 147 posts. With all the fervor in almost all other card sectors, why has the 19th century been left behind? Are 19th century collectors a dying breed or have younger collectors not "advanced" to the roots of baseball and the cards of the era yet?

BobbyStrawberry 05-28-2021 10:23 AM

I think your second point is definitely true; it seems to me that many collectors are simply holding their 19th century stuff. Seems harder to find 19th century cards FS everywhere, not just on here.

Jcfowler6 05-28-2021 10:26 AM

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...66717a1b01.jpg

I’m holding onto my few. Here’s a card because all threads need one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RCMcKenzie 05-28-2021 10:59 AM

3 Attachment(s)
Here's a recent addition, Shorty Fuller OJ with Buck Barker style notations on back. Also shown, Fuller's Pelicans cabinet...

Leon 05-28-2021 11:18 AM

There seems to be a lack of interest from what I have seen. I like them a lot but admittedly they aren't my focus. Maybe a lot of collectors just have a few and aren't focused on them?

Picked this one up in the last few months.

https://luckeycards.com/mini.jpg

Casey2296 05-28-2021 11:52 AM

1 Attachment(s)
If anybody knows where I can find them I'd love some more of these in this condition.
-

brianp-beme 05-28-2021 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie (Post 2107738)
Here's a recent addition, Shorty Fuller OJ with Buck Barker style notations on back. Also shown, Fuller's Pelicans cabinet...

That Old Judge indeed has Buck Barker's handwriting on back. Also, I can't quite make it out because it looks like it was partially erased, but on the bottom it should also indicate the last name of whom Buck received this card from in 1958.

Brian

jcmtiger 05-28-2021 01:00 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Can’t find any Detroit that I need. Of course what I need are tough finds.

BobbyStrawberry 05-28-2021 01:21 PM

Interesting. This is a recent pickup of mine. Could this be Barker's handwriting as well?

https://i.ibb.co/8NZsb6y/N172-Van-Ha...SA-A-front.jpghttps://i.ibb.co/khfRY1z/N172-Van-Ha...PSA-A-back.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianp-beme (Post 2107762)
That Old Judge indeed has Buck Barker's handwriting on back. Also, I can't quite make it out because it looks like it was partially erased, but on the bottom it should also indicate the last name of whom Buck received this card from in 1958.

Brian


riggs336 05-28-2021 01:29 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Here's a Tim Keefe I picked up on Facebook.

the-illini 05-28-2021 02:16 PM

IMO most of the "new" money coming in to the hobby is spent on mainstream cards of the bigger stars or more widely known sets like T206

No one wants to spend 1k for a nice OJ of Tommy McCarthy

GaryPassamonte 05-28-2021 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the-illini (Post 2107806)
IMO most of the "new" money coming in to the hobby is spent on mainstream cards of the bigger stars or more widely known sets like T206

No one wants to spend 1k for a nice OJ of Tommy McCarthy

But someone did for a Yum Yum Ewing, Chris. Great card!

jingram058 05-28-2021 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casey2296 (Post 2107753)
If anybody knows where I can find them I'd love some more of these in this condition.
-

Phil, those are beautiful. Color always brings the point home.

bcbgcbrcb 05-28-2021 03:38 PM

As previously mentioned, the investors are after the GOATS, very difficult to compare the modern game to the 1880’s-1890’s, where the likes of Cap Anson would be recognized as the greatest of that era. I bet you that 95%+ of investors have never heard of Cap Anson without google searching him.

The best way to gauge true collector interest is that almost every BST ad on Net54 in the 19th century section is BUYING this HOF’er or that HOF’er, rarely, if ever, SELLING a HOF’er. Look it up.

Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey 05-28-2021 03:52 PM

Re: 19th Century cards
 
*deleted/mistake/duplicate*

Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey 05-28-2021 03:54 PM

Re: 19th Century cards
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb (Post 2107829)
As previously mentioned, the investors are after the GOATS, very difficult to compare the modern game to the 1880’s-1890’s, where the likes of Cap Anson would be recognized as the greatest of that era. I bet you that 95%+ of investors have never heard of Cap Anson without google searching him..

Sweet!!! I'm in the 5%

And I was told the Simpsons would "rot my brain"....HA

ASF123 05-28-2021 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GaryPassamonte (Post 2107826)
But someone did for a Yum Yum Ewing, Chris. Great card!

Try saying “Yum Yum Ewing” ten times fast.

the-illini 05-28-2021 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GaryPassamonte (Post 2107826)
But someone did for a Yum Yum Ewing, Chris. Great card!

Ha thanks Gary!

Andrew - Yum Yum Ewing doesn't flow right off the tongue. I wonder who decided to name a tobacco brand "Yum Yum"

trdcrdkid 05-28-2021 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the-illini (Post 2107876)
Ha thanks Gary!

Andrew - Yum Yum Ewing doesn't flow right off the tongue. I wonder who decided to name a tobacco brand "Yum Yum"

I'm sure it was named after the character in The Mikado, which was massively popular in the late 1880s. There were tons of Mikado-themed trade cards issued at the time, including many picturing Yum Yum.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...10fde6e0_b.jpg

brianp-beme 05-28-2021 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry (Post 2107790)
Interesting. This is a recent pickup of mine. Could this be Barker's handwriting as well?

https://i.ibb.co/8NZsb6y/N172-Van-Ha...SA-A-front.jpghttps://i.ibb.co/khfRY1z/N172-Van-Ha...PSA-A-back.jpg

Image is kinda small, but it does look like it is possibly Buck's handwriting. Post a bigger image and I should be able to more positively identify.

Brian

BobbyStrawberry 05-28-2021 09:45 PM

Thanks Brian, here is a larger image of the back.
https://i.ibb.co/QMMDzxR/N172-Van-Ha...PSA-A-back.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by brianp-beme (Post 2107958)
Image is kinda small, but it does look like it is possibly Buck's handwriting. Post a bigger image and I should be able to more positively identify.

Brian


brianp-beme 05-29-2021 01:18 AM

That appears to be Buck's handwriting...always fun to see it on cards other than Zeenuts.

Brian

mouschi 05-29-2021 04:15 AM

The noise level for new stuff is incredibly high. I see 19th century baseball as a much smaller voice - but a voice that has a whole lot more meaningful things to say.

For years, I was caught up in new stuff, but once I discovered 19th century baseball, I couldn't get enough. I think it is all a matter of educating newer collectors about 19th century baseball.

I love being able to talk to others about this time period, and have perked up more ears than I can count. It is one of the greatest "untapped" time periods in the history of our sport - for the 2021 collector, that is.

BobbyStrawberry 05-29-2021 11:23 AM

Good to know! I appreciate the input, Brian
Quote:

Originally Posted by brianp-beme (Post 2107978)
That appears to be Buck's handwriting...always fun to see it on cards other than Zeenuts.

Brian


G1911 05-29-2021 12:11 PM

1) Lack of recognizable names today restricts the 19th market to people who are interested in that period, eliminating the #investor crowd. There is also not an iconic card to drive interest to the rest of the set. most hobbyists know T206 Wagner, 1952 Topps Mantle's, 33 Lajoie's, even things like T206 Cobb's. There are some great and very expensive 19th century cards, but there's not really an iconic card to the rest of the hobby that draws more eyes to it.

2) It's a struggle for set collectors. Sets are for the most part extremely rare and difficult, most of them practically impossible for even the wealthier. The easier ones are usually not really baseball sets like N28/N29. Those of us primarily interested in set collecting thus tend to stick with other things. I'm sure someone has an example of a set for which this is not true, but it is mostly true.

3) Maybe it's just me, but a mangled T206 is still a nice looking image. Fading has ruined the appearance of a large number of the surviving 19th century cards that are mostly photographic. Later photographic cards mostly do not have this problem.

4) Tied to 3 somewhat, the grading companies appear to ignore or mostly ignore fading and stock damage (frequently slabbing excellent old Judge's which are obviously heavily faded and damaged) further discourages the #invest, and also some mid-grade collectors. The registry is also less of a factor, a little bit of cards being "too rare" going on here.

5) It is difficult to dip one's toes into the 19th century water. Collectors tend to start at the low-end of the scale, picking up a common T206 or something as a first of an era. This is still a pretty cheap "that's cool" whim buy, you can get a T205 or T206 for less than $20, a Goudey for less than $10 to get a card from an era collectors today didn't witness and have memories of. 19th century baseball, there isn't such a common low-price buy-in to serve as a starting point and have that "that's cool" turn into "wow, I want to get more of these!". Most people don't start with the marque cards outside of the #invest crowd, which other factors discourage.


I like 19th century baseball, I love seeing the cards posted here, but I don't have many myself primarily for reason 3, I love set-building and sets are generally either too rare or too expensive for me to justify doing. Just some thoughts.

GaryPassamonte 05-29-2021 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G1911 (Post 2108135)
1) Lack of recognizable names today restricts the 19th market to people who are interested in that period, eliminating the #investor crowd. There is also not an iconic card to drive interest to the rest of the set. most hobbyists know T206 Wagner, 1952 Topps Mantle's, 33 Lajoie's, even things like T206 Cobb's. There are some great and very expensive 19th century cards, but there's not really an iconic card to the rest of the hobby that draws more eyes to it.

2) It's a struggle for set collectors. Sets are for the most part extremely rare and difficult, most of them practically impossible for even the wealthier. The easier ones are usually not really baseball sets like N28/N29. Those of us primarily interested in set collecting thus tend to stick with other things. I'm sure someone has an example of a set for which this is not true, but it is mostly true.

3) Maybe it's just me, but a mangled T206 is still a nice looking image. Fading has ruined the appearance of a large number of the surviving 19th century cards that are mostly photographic. Later photographic cards mostly do not have this problem.

4) Tied to 3 somewhat, the grading companies appear to ignore or mostly ignore fading and stock damage (frequently slabbing excellent old Judge's which are obviously heavily faded and damaged) further discourages the #invest, and also some mid-grade collectors. The registry is also less of a factor, a little bit of cards being "too rare" going on here.

5) It is difficult to dip one's toes into the 19th century water. Collectors tend to start at the low-end of the scale, picking up a common T206 or something as a first of an era. This is still a pretty cheap "that's cool" whim buy, you can get a T205 or T206 for less than $20, a Goudey for less than $10 to get a card from an era collectors today didn't witness and have memories of. 19th century baseball, there isn't such a common low-price buy-in to serve as a starting point and have that "that's cool" turn into "wow, I want to get more of these!". Most people don't start with the marque cards outside of the #invest crowd, which other factors discourage.


I like 19th century baseball, I love seeing the cards posted here, but I don't have many myself primarily for reason 3, I love set-building and sets are generally either too rare or too expensive for me to justify doing. Just some thoughts.


Excellent analysis.

rats60 05-29-2021 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb (Post 2107829)
As previously mentioned, the investors are after the GOATS, very difficult to compare the modern game to the 1880’s-1890’s, where the likes of Cap Anson would be recognized as the greatest of that era. I bet you that 95%+ of investors have never heard of Cap Anson without google searching him.

The best way to gauge true collector interest is that almost every BST ad on Net54 in the 19th century section is BUYING this HOF’er or that HOF’er, rarely, if ever, SELLING a HOF’er. Look it up.

It is not PC to buy Anson cards. The new money wouldn't be interested.

oldjudge 05-30-2021 03:03 PM

Agree. It’s tough to spend a lot of money on cards of the guy most responsible for the institution of the color barrier in baseball. What if some day his plaque is removed from Cooperstown?

Exhibitman 05-30-2021 03:22 PM

Excellent analysis, Greg.

I've purchased a few N cards over the last year or so, but at least for me, they are purely opportunistic purchases. Except for a few 'mainstream' issues these are cards that just don't show up often. That may be part of the answer as to why we don't see much 'action' on them. I have a want list of 19th century cards that I do not expect to satisfy except by happenstance, as was the case with the most recent one I picked up.

CobbSpikedMe 05-31-2021 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 2107742)
There seems to be a lack of interest from what I have seen. I like them a lot but admittedly they aren't my focus. Maybe a lot of collectors just have a few and aren't focused on them?

Picked this one up in the last few months.

https://luckeycards.com/mini.jpg

Leon, the Brooklyn Minis are by far my favorite Old Judge cards. Nice pick up




.

rgpete 05-31-2021 11:55 AM

2 Attachment(s)
Because of Samuel Barkley he was one of the players who changed the name of the Pittsburgh Alleghenies to the Pirates

chlankf 05-31-2021 09:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)
My recent OJ pick up. Not a lot of Des Moines cards to be found lately.

oldjudge 05-31-2021 10:42 PM

Beautiful image Craig!

chlankf 06-01-2021 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 2109002)
Beautiful image Craig!

Thanks Jay. Probably one of the nicest in my collection.

wondo 06-01-2021 11:08 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Love 'em - but only own one. And, it's because he's a Penn Stater! Got this from a fellow board member.

rhodeskenm 06-02-2021 03:51 AM

Hope for 19th crntityy
 
Hi Gary and others

There is a small but growing new gem of 19 century collectors. I am a boomer but two younger friends and I have started a private Facebook group called Old Judge Collectors or OJC. We have 73 members so far, our aim is to share knowledge, show off new cards, rap about 19th c baseball snd occasionally help each other get new cards.

I still use net54 for buy sell etc but our site is fun and I think it will stoke next gen on 19 C cards. If you look at history of sales (vcp) it has always been a niche market, but I feel there is hope snd interest in keeping it alive.

Anyone interested can friend me on Facebook or net messenger.

GaryPassamonte 06-02-2021 06:49 AM

Which Ken Rhodes are you on facebook?

Yoda 06-02-2021 12:16 PM

Leon, I wonder what your FBH Kelly would go for in today's market? I suppose you have thought about it, too.

GaryPassamonte 06-02-2021 02:30 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 2109511)
Leon, I wonder what your FBH Kelly would go for in today's market? I suppose you have thought about it, too.


My all-time favorite baseball card. This is not mine.

rhodeskenm 06-02-2021 02:38 PM

Hi Gary

I am Princeton grad referenced in my bio and my pic is of me with my then 18 year old son at a sports bar near Penn St (he went there)

Best

Ken Rhodes

packs 06-02-2021 04:39 PM

I've missed out on a few Whitney with Dog cards on eBay this year. That card is always a fight.

obcmac 06-03-2021 03:15 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Just starting to get my feet wet on the 19th century side. Fun & new area for me.

GaryPassamonte 06-03-2021 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by obcmac (Post 2109899)
Just starting to get my feet wet on the 19th century side. Fun & new area for me.

That's a pretty good opener!

mouschi 06-03-2021 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by obcmac (Post 2109899)
just starting to get my feet wet on the 19th century side. Fun & new area for me.

want

BobbyStrawberry 06-03-2021 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by obcmac (Post 2109899)
Just starting to get my feet wet on the 19th century side. Fun & new area for me.

I would say that's more like jumping into the deep end head first...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 AM.