Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   1 more question (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=200064)

stu060283 01-17-2015 04:52 PM

1 more question
 
3 Attachment(s)
Hi again, 1 last question for a while i promise :) I bought this Rodger Clemens ball last year. The seller claimed that he got it at a company event in the late 80's. The signed ball came in a BNN comunications box. I think its a good sig, but would value more experienced options.

I am also watching a Barry Bonds signed ball. The sig looks quite faded and it has no coa (although learning from this forum that doesn't always count for anything) What are your thoughts on the Bonds sig and the balls value

Promise no more questions for a while!!

Econteachert205 01-17-2015 05:11 PM

Clemens looks pretty typical, skeptical of bonds

dgo71 01-17-2015 08:04 PM

Clemens looks good. The Bonds is laughable.

Scott Garner 01-17-2015 10:20 PM

Clemens is authentic & Mr. Bonds is a NO!

stu060283 01-18-2015 04:17 AM

Thanks again, glad i used my gut instinct and kept away from the Bonds ball

w7imel 01-18-2015 08:01 AM

Not autograph related but I got to go to a game and see clemens pitch when he was playing for astros. Me and my son went to watch him warm up he had 2 guys standing next to him as he pitched. One guy was holding a towel so he could wipe sweat away and the other had a cup of water for him when he was thirsty. Thought to myself "that must be a great contract he has"! haha

djson1 01-20-2015 10:57 AM

I don't think it's supposed to be a Barry Bonds signed ball....I can see the "Bonds" kind of does resemble his signature, but the first name looks like "Don" in the picture. Maybe it's not even a "Barry Bonds" signed ball, but the seller just thought it was when he bought it from someplace else.:confused:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 AM.