Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Any idea what's wrong with this one? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=78913)

Archive 10-29-2005 04:09 AM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>John Effenheim</b><p>Why the authentic designation? I've been looking for an affordable Griffith for my Milwaukee player collection.<br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1887-N172-Old-Judge-Clark-Griffith-PSA-Authentic_W0QQitemZ8715376909QQcategoryZ31718QQssP ageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1887-N172-Old-Judge-Clark-Griffith-PSA-Authentic_W0QQitemZ8715376909QQcategoryZ31718QQssP ageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a>

Archive 10-29-2005 05:47 AM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>Perhaps the collector chose between the 1 and the authentic?

Archive 10-29-2005 07:14 AM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>dennis</b><p>i'd say trimmed

Archive 10-29-2005 08:53 AM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>john/z28jd</b><p>I figured by the stains around the edge that it was a bad rebacking job by someone

Archive 10-29-2005 10:40 AM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>Anson</b><p>It could be trimmed but I would agree with the possible rebacking comment. Most would generally take a PSA 1 to an authentic tag.

Archive 10-29-2005 12:15 PM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>robert a</b><p>I'd say it's been rebacked too.

Archive 10-29-2005 02:12 PM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>John Effenheim</b><p>Too bad they don't give you more detail when they give an authentic grade. The seller didn't know either.

Archive 11-03-2005 04:29 PM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>Mark</b><p>Does PSA grade rebacked cards? I know SGC and GAI do not. Skimmed back, yes, but rebacked no.

Archive 11-03-2005 06:02 PM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>Julie Vognar</b><p>..............

Archive 11-03-2005 11:03 PM

Any idea what's wrong with this one?
 
Posted By: <b>tbob</b><p>On some caramel issues I'd rather take an "AUTH" over a 1 where the former looks like a 6 or 7 except for some tiny trim job which to the naked eye is unrecognizable and where the latter looks like it was stuck with gum on the bottom of Roger Clemens' spikes for an entire season. I realize that right now a 1 may bring more money over the aesthetically pleasing card but that might change in the future...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 PM.