|  | 
| 
 A tale of two lords... 2 Attachment(s) I picked up an extra Lord EPDG in Sterling last night just to have for trading... but now the dilema.  Which one to keep? | 
| 
 I assume the point of collecting the EPDG cards is the back right? | 
| 
 To keep? I would choose the miscut. But, you want to trade the other, and what kind of bait is that for an paper loss back EPDG? | 
| 
 Eric, It isn't an EPDG without the E and without the P. It's merely a DG.;) There must be someone out there with a Lord back run, who doesn't have a DG.:D | 
| 
 Epdg Keep the miscut. No sense in collecting or paying a premium for a rarer back when it has paper loss ON THE BACK. Just my 2 cents. John P | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 My least favorite flaw is paper loss.  I can accept it if it doesn't run into color (just the border of a t206, or on the back of a blank back).  So I take the creased one, but if you just plan on displaying with the front getting more attention I wouldn't fault you for keeping the one that displays better from the front. | 
| 
 Sell them both and buy one without a crease or paper loss. | 
| 
 Hi Erick, Where you are doing an EPDG subset, I'd keep the one with the intact back. | 
| 
 The Almighty I think you should consider asking the good Lord which one to keep. But if it were up to me I would keep the one with the back paper loss. Minority opinion Brian | 
| 
 this one http://photos.imageevent.com/cfc1909...bsize/Lord.jpghttp://photos.imageevent.com/cfc1909...size/Lordb.jpg SGC put this one in a 55 holder | 
| 
 I dont worry about value of a card, and since i put them in albums back to back, you dont see the backs of my cards, so i love cards that have back damage.  It lowers the price and a lot of times the front looks great.  So obviously, i voted for the back damaged card to be kept. | 
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 AM. |