Ruth auto
1 Attachment(s)
Real or not it is in pensil
|
I don't think it's good.
|
^^^Thats actually not true. I’d have to study it a little bit more, but my first instinct says “genuine”, just super rushed. Although Ruth loved to take his time and deliver a quality autograph, every once in a while you’ll get a rushed example. And I’m almost positive that’s exactly what this is. I’ll look at it again tomorrow...
|
I'm not an expert but I compared with about 30 quick image results on Google and to me it is not good.
I haven't seen an example with such a poor a. And I haven't seen an example with so much spacing in between the B and R. The U in Ruth is connected a large amount of the time and when it's not it has a nice tail on the front side and is extremely close to touching. I don't see either of those traits. For Sincerely He never writes a swooping L like that. It's always very tight. Same Goes with the S too. Unless it's a death bed signature I don't see it being real. Maybe I'm overanalyzing, I would send it to psa regardless. |
It’s just rushed. It’s good though.
|
Brendan is correct. It's good.
|
Thanks David. They are few and far between, but there are some rushed Ruth’s out there. And this is one of them.
|
Yes, looks rushed.....but looks good. :)
|
my first instinct at first glance was faked but after closer look I would tend to agree it looks rushed but it does look genuine.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM. |