1991 Topps print error
 

‘

1991 topps
 

V

Oh dear lord don't let this become like facebook where every print flaw is now an error. This is nothing. The card is nothing. Not to mention it's way off topic for a Pre WWII group.

Remove
 

.

You posted in the wrong place anyway. Try posting in the correct place next time, please. We all like cool cards but the front page is predominantly pre-WWII.

thanks!

.
 

NA

Delete

Welcome to Post War. There are several dedicated variant collectors over here. Check out these two treads. Most collectors don't look for or care much about off beat cards, but some do. I can guarantee if the 57 Bakep had been discovered a week ago it would have been a big heh rather than a hobby recognized variation

https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=187722

https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=200148

+1 OP should post a pic there , I seen it before it was deleted, had kind of a terminator thing going

https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=187722

Well frankly Bakep, Herrer and Frank Thomas missing name probably SHOULDN'T be considered errors in the traditional sense, but at least they appear across multiple copies creating a noticeable population.

If every fish-eye and random print flaw would be considered an error then half of the cards from the 1960's and 70's would be errors! I see this so much elsewhere with people trying to convince others that they've hit the lottery that it rankles. The idea that kind of nonsense would invade Net54 irked me even more.

Despite my feelings (rankled and irked) on the subject, I'd like to point out that I did not insult anyone.

.
 

N

Leon please remove
 

Leon please remove my post
Did not mean to inconvenience any member here