|  | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Jay</b><p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1887-N-172-OLD-JUDGE-HENRY-LARKIN-PSA-4-VG-EX_W0QQitemZ140214356540QQihZ004QQcategoryZ31718QQ  ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1887-N-172-OLD-JUDGE-HENRY-LARKIN-PSA-4-VG-EX_W0QQitemZ140214356540QQihZ004QQcategoryZ31718QQ  ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a> | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>robert a</b><p>should've been 4.5. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>I think it should have been a 4.5.......nice eye appeal though.... | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Zinn</b><p>I saw that too and said WTF.  | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Fred C</b><p>I think PSA has a drug aversion program called KOC (kids off crack) where they train kids on crack how to grade cards rather than smoke crack.  Unfortunately, it looks like the program is failing.       | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Paul S</b><p>And to think that card was only a 3.5 before they washed it. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Darren</b><p>Maybe it's the photo but the right border looks frosty.  It's a 2 at best. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Bruce Babcock</b><p>WTF, indeed. What do you have to do to get the "Mark" qualifier? As someone who has submitted a few cards that came back with the "Mark" qualifier, although I was never able to FIND the mark, I gave up. In all fairness, PSA did properly identify the card as an Old Judge. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>John S</b><p>Ridiculous.  They must have numbered stairs at PSA.  They toss the card and it is graded according to where it lands. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>Maybe the 4 has to due with the number of stains on the card. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Ed Hans</b><p>Grossly overgraded due to the stains and poor photo contrast. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>"poor photo contrast" - Ed<br /><br />Both PSA and SGC do not degrade for poor contrast on OJs.  I've seen 7s where you could hardly make out that there was someone pictured. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Brian</b><p><img src="http://i8.ebayimg.com/01/i/000/e0/56/2e4f_1.JPG"> | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>CoreyRS.hanus</b><p>So in making the argument that the sole role of grading companies should be to opine whether cards are altered or unaltered, this is as good a candidate as any to be Exhibit A. | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>joe</b><p>Overgraded campared to some of my graded OJ's.<br /><br />Joe<br><br>Ty Cobb, Spikes flying! | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>bigfish</b><p>Are those glue stains? | 
| 
 Any Opinions on this Grade? Posted By: <b>Fred C</b><p>I'm almost tempted to send in a load of cards to PSA.  If that's a 4 then I'm sure I have a few 8's. | 
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 PM. |