View Single Post
  #205  
Old 07-26-2012, 09:04 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
Kenny you are right, a treaty cannot supersede the Constitution.
My premises was made on Article VI. Section 2 which says, “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land…”

If I’m interpreting it wrong, then my apologies. I don’t want to give out false information.

Edited to add:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Cole View Post
Unless the Supreme Court has overruled Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), I'm pretty doubtful that treaties supersede the Constitution.
Supreme Court Justices Ginsburg and Breyer have both said that international law should take precedence over US law.

Last edited by vintagetoppsguy; 07-26-2012 at 09:19 PM.
Reply With Quote