Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B
I'd hardly call his assessment of an odd 89 Fleer "proof" Especially when it has a number of technical errors and statements that follow no logic.
|
The article showed how to spot a real '89 Ripken FF error from a fake. I thought it was very informative (not that I collect that kind of stuff) and there are clearly many differences between the two. Then, he showed a picture of the fake residing in a PSA slab. Look below, Steve. What more "proof" do you need?
