View Single Post
  #1  
Old 01-06-2014, 08:49 PM
x2drich2000 x2drich2000 is offline
(DJ) Rich.ard.s
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,208
Default Caramel sets compared to t206 backs

Several of the early caramel sets (e90, e92, e101, e102, etc) share the same card image but have different backs much the same way as the different t206 series. I was curious how everyone would match up the different t206 backs to these caramel sets and their corresponding backs. For simplicity, let's think about the typical card from the caramel sets and not the extremely easy or extremely tough cards from a set (i.e. ignore the e102 Wagner throwing, e92 Nadja Bresnahan, e105 Young/Knight, etc). Below are a few that I think match up fairly well. Agree, disagree, fill in the rest.

E90-1 - piedmont/sweetcaps (except f42)
E92 Dockman - polar bear
E92 crofts candy black - ?
E92 crofts candy blue - ?
E92 crofts candy red - broadleaf 460
E92 crofts cocoa - ?
E92 Nadja - broadleaf 350
E101 - ?
E102 - ?
E105 - black lenox
E106 - ?

DJ
__________________
Current Wantlist:
E92 Nadja - Bescher, Bridwell, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman
E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1, T216 (all versions)
E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry, Shean, and Evers
Reply With Quote