I'm confused - is he a genuinely good man who every now and then screws people out of their money when he isn't making religious treks, contributing to charities or helping others recover from their sins, because he has random personal definitions of 'right' and 'wrong'?...
or did he finally figure it all out once he was caught and now he is always genuinely good?
It sounds like his lawyer would have us believe that during this 'post getting caught' period he figured all of this out and imposed an 'I am miserable because I got caught' sentence on himself, and so now he has appropriately punished himself. So he's good, evil and also a judge and sentencer?
This sounds like a lot of horseshit.