| 
				 an economic experiment? 
 
			
			This is a fascinating thread, and surely it is an economic experiment.  The buyer "announces" that he will be buying X card at above-market prices.  How will the market react?  Will price move?  How many cards exist (supply)?  I think it would be fun to try this myself if I had already cornered the market and were really a seller (as some have hinted); rationally, one oughtn't buy the cheap talk and assume this is a best response to a previously assemble position.  Beyond this, this experiment is generating a lot of information that was not previously available to all.  What is the true supply of high numbers from 1952?  I hope that we all continue to track this, preferably, in the post-war forum.  It is a nice extension of the Curt Flood experiment, where the buyer was a real buyer but did not announce his intentions in advance.
 My contribution to the experiment: A key supply indicator is the PSA pop reports.  So, why not take the OP's 20-25% of the PSA supply, crack them, and resubmit.  Then, you will have about 50% of the published supply.  All buyers will then see high pop reports but zero/low supply on EBAY and elsewhere.  This would look like an anomaly to market observers, and it might generate interest.  Perhaps, more velocity in the #332 turnover/marketing out of collections.
 
				 Last edited by mooch; 10-18-2015 at 02:05 PM.
 |