Quote:
Originally Posted by packs
Well what is your reasoning behind not being suspicious? When Brady Anderson hit 50 homers wasn't that suspicious? Why was it suspicious? I would say it's because nothing he did before that suggested he was that talented. I would say the same about Beltre and his walk years.
|
His 2011, 2012 and 2013 years were some of his most productive years of his career, and I have zero suspicion that he was on anything in those years, where drug testing was and has been pretty high in the order compared to 2004.
I suspect guys like Frank Thomas, Piazza, Thome, etc, but I'm not going to say I wouldn't ever vote for them when I don't know for a fact that they actually did