Yes I think all of those guys should be in with perhaps the exception of Brown due to his appearing on the Mitchell list.
It's a crime Mussina wasn't a first ballot guy as he should have been.
and yes for their careers Murray and Kaat provided very similar value, overall. I don't get why you have such a hard time with this.
If you play ten years and put up 72 WAR you were a better player than a guy who put up 72 WAR over 20 years, but FOR YOUR CAREER, you provided exactly the same amount of wins above a replacement player.
do you think that 2000 pounds of dirt piled slowly is less a ton than 2000 pounds of dirt piled quickly?
Kaat was a reliever for 4 of the final 5 years of his career, thus providing very little value on a WAR basis.
Kaat 19 seasons of positive WAR contribution - total fWAR 70.9
Eddie Murray 18 seasons of positive WAR contribution- total fWAR 72.0
and like I said, Kaat's peak production period of 1961-1975 he was the 3rd best pitcher behind only Gibson and Gaylord Perry.
Eddie Murray's peak production period from 1977-1990 he was 4th best position player behind Schmidt, Henderson and Brett.
I think both compare pretty well, they are within 1 WAR for their careers had similar rankings against their peers in their prime and both had similar total years of positive WAR contribution.
__________________
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away."- Tom Waits
|