I'm sure the only reason it was not submitted for grading was the seller's acute awareness of how the impact of paper loss on the reverse would adversely affect the grade. 
The reprint/not a reprint dichotomy simply clarifies that this is not a reprint of a reprint. I do not have a problem with that. This will reassure "first generation reprint" collectors that they are bidding on an original reprint. 
I like the centering. 
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER.
GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES
274/1000 Monster Number
Last edited by frankbmd; 12-16-2016 at 10:27 AM.
|