View Single Post
  #4  
Old 12-21-2016, 10:38 PM
Wolverine Wolverine is offline
member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by z28jd View Post
RBI's weren't officially kept until 1920, so while I don't know the answer to your question, I can't imagine anyone thought Ty Cobb won the Triple Crown in 1909 by leading in an unofficial stat. If the term was used for Cobb, or anyone before 1920, it wasn't anything MLB recognized.

When Paul Hines "won" the first Triple Crown in 1878, there was no RBI stat and for many years, Abner Dalrymple was credited with the batting crown that season, so Hines definitely didn't know he won the Triple Crown. He was credited with it after he passed away.

The next three winners,Tip O'Neill, Hugh Duffy and Nap Lajoie wouldn't have known either because RBI's weren't even tabulated (something that was done from 1907-19, but not an official stat).

It's possible Medwick was the first, and it also could have been something that someone came up with for future reference and he just happened to be the first who led in all three.
Very interesting. Thanks for taking the time to respond.

The friend I have who claimed Cobb was the first to be recognized as a "Triple Crown winner" actually has a photo of Cobb pictured during the 1909 season from the Detroit Free Press that is captioned "Ty Cobb - 1909 Triple Crown - 1909 AL Champions".

He has no idea what year the photo is actually from though. It could have been issued in 1909 or at a later date in commemoration of Cobb's 1909 season. But now that you've informed me that RBI's weren't an official stat until 1920 (something I didn't know), it makes me lean more towards the photo being issued post-1920.
Reply With Quote