[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

right what on earth am i talking about. If there was a trial on a 1952 Mantle being doctored and reholdered, you think the judge would allow that guy (the poster that bought the dimaggio) on the jury? I think he would be considered biased. People have disagreed with you that had nothing to do with the actuall card that was bought or sold.

i just value the opinions more of people that werent actually involved about the transaction being a scam or not. As far as what facts occured, yes, I would want to know it from the people that actually were involved in the transaction.

I cannot imagine a more valuable opinion on whether a non-disclosed fact is material than that of a guy like Cortney who is a major buyer of vintage cards. I don't know why you keep fighting the obvious, there was fraud here.