Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
Nah, you need INTENT to disadvantage someone for that to apply. And you need a duty to have acted.
|
So you are saying, You don't have a duty to act when told you are being stolen from? And then 20+ yrs later it is ok for you to act and disadvantage a third party? Please help me understand that.
OK, I see the intent to harm.....but it is beyond my GED education to argue further.