Summing up, I note several characteristics of Daniel's posts to date.
1. Selectively answering questions.
2. Playing the victim by claiming he is being bullied when he isn't. A very common tactic.
3. Raising straw men, such as "it isn't illegal to do X." Nobody accused him of illegality.
4. Spinning -- e.g., Ed's having to return a 3K card was somehow a "positive experience."
5. Selectively claiming he doesn't have time to debate, as though that explained/justified his refusal to answer certain questions.
6. Repeating his mantra ad nauseum. "We are not Battlefield."
7. Feigning outrage, as in his response to the claim that he bounced a substantial e-check.
There are probably others.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 04-01-2018 at 05:10 PM.
|