some simple
logical solutions the tps maybe able to reduce the error rate:
1) have a panel of experts look at each auto(if jsa is on site......and if only 1 or 2 authenticators are present, have experts on staff remotely look at scans as the on site graders look at it physically)
2) keep a data base of cards graded and cert #'s and scans....this way cards can get cross checked(even if re slabbed)
3) have grading companies "freely" share data to reduce fraud and work together to help the industry as a whole
4) ask for "provenance" of the signed pieces- paper work , photos , witness accounts, letters, ect
5) include a report to reflect these things
6) have different "tiers" of being authenticated- example tier 1 = only an "opinion" card or item- has no provenance , but graders "feels" it looks as if were authentic tier 2 = piece or card with original origin story and documentation tier 3 = documentation, photos ect...
so tier 1 tier 2 or tier 3 in confidence of authenticity(higher tier, more likely it is authentic)
7) btw- PSA DNA- do they actually conduct DNA TESTS?????????
maybe they can somehow in the future actually dna pieces for and detect something that way?????
not sure....
these are just some quick thoughts about how TPGers can "tighten" up standards on these pieces
|