Quote:
Originally Posted by perezfan
Ok, so they’re not all 18 years old. That excuse actually would have been far more acceptable/preferable to whatever reality is.
How would you explain the sheer incompetence then?
Poor eyesight?
Favorable treatment for “certain customers”?
General ineptitude at the one thing they’re employed to do?
I believe the “18 year old” explanation is far less damning than anything else that can be conjured up in PSA’s defense.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny630
In the words of Mrs. Clinton at this point what difference does it make.
Who cares how old the grader is ? I don’t
The bottom line relevance is regardless of age....they can’t consistently determine whether a card is altered or not. End
|
And still nothing from Sloan/PSA about any of this.
Unbelievable that some still defend/utilize them and try to deflect attention away from their incompetence.
