Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark17
So does this mean Brent refunded on the card, admitting it had been altered, and then simply resold it? You'd think he would have defaced the PSA flip identifying the card as altered, at minimum, or broken it out of the PSA case so it would, at least for awhile, not be incorrectly labeled a PSA 2.
If the chain of ownership of that card, and what's been happening with it, can be clearly established, I do not think it would go well if introduced as evidence of misrepresentation (fraud) in court.
|
I had an error in my original response that I've now corrected. Brent/PWCC not in the resell loop. Main point is that card is back in the wild with some unsuspecting buyer sure to pounce.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk