Quote:
Originally Posted by Republicaninmass
Let's rely on skewed data, not people who collect the set.
Advantage of grading a low grade common
Advantage of grading a high number.
No affect on cards submitted.
High numbers, hardly rare or scarce. Demand outweighs supply.
Im having a great day Dave. Not wasting my life debating and researching something I cant control. I worked with the 52 set for a majority of my collecting career, only about 25 years. Aside from Rosen's find, that produced many of the high grade Highs in the pop report, I dont believe I've seen any collection with only or the same amount of high numbers.
I have a hard time believing even repacks 10 years later would go unnoticed and not be scooped up by at least a few collectors working on the set.
I dont believe for one second, given the stars and amount of Giants, Yankees, and red sox in the high series, were an accident. It was loaded with September world series hopefuls and stars to encourage buying late in the season.
These are just opinions, and certainly worth what you paid for them. Just wanted to add my two cents.
I've also edited for spelling, not because I typed in some roid rage....David
|
Hmmm, I haven't said about half the things you think I did and I don't think you have ever understood my original point, which was Topps never dumped the cards at Sea and instead got rid of excess warehouse stock to CCC around 1960, who sold them as singles.