View Single Post
  #5  
Old 03-31-2020, 11:31 AM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
J0hn Collin$
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkhorse9 View Post
My big question is why is that only a 5.5? Seems like that would be higher based on what I can see. That would be my red flag
There are 5-range cards that look like 3's, and then some that look more like 7's that were undergraded. It's difficult because EX is a catch-all middle grade. If the corners and centering are really nice, the card might have a difficult to spot surface problem that reduced it, or something else on the back. I've seen vintage cards that look like they should be given 8's or 9's based on centering and corners graded 5 due to very light surface wrinkles - yes, even on the front. They aren't supposed to do that, but I've seen it.

You would probably need more detailed scans, or to inspect it in person to see precisely why that one graded what it did. But I would agree just from that one scan, it looks fantastic for the grade assigned and not like a garden variety 5.5. Congrats if you pick it up!
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers.

Last edited by jchcollins; 03-31-2020 at 11:45 AM.
Reply With Quote