Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmopar
The Pafko is another example of a card being "worth" way more than it should be worth.
|
Agreed. I've always thought that card was way over-hyped. The rarity in it being #1 is totally related to condition, but should have nothing to do with the card's production. It's not a scarce high number. I'm ok with truly great condition, NM Pafko's going for a premium, but there isn't really anything special about G and VG copies.
__________________
Vintage Cubs. Postwar stars & HOF'ers. 1956, ‘62, ‘71, & ‘72 Topps sets. Topps Heritage.
Last edited by jchcollins; 10-09-2020 at 06:39 AM.
|