Quote:
Originally Posted by cardsagain74
Now you're the one using false equivalencies.
Showing that those listed (assumed) sales were around current market prices does not prove your point. Though most of us were not disputing that as part of the "suspicious" argument anyway.
Some of us feel that (given how people hate to take any losses, and especially quick ones) that it's odd that anyone would continue to sell that particular Mayweather when they did. Especially with a company that has no qualms about being pretty slimy.
You disagree and feel that it was simply people panicking.
These are not objective matters, and you're inaccurately trying to make them so and ignoring a key opposing point to falsely "prove" what you want to assume
|
If the proposition is, two consecutive people did not win this card and consign it right back to PWCC, then you are right, prices don't disprove that.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 08-24-2021 at 10:46 PM.
|