Quote:
Originally Posted by doug.goodman
Yeah, printing cards isn't something that I see as being very complicated.
|
It's not, but pretty much every company that's gotten started has made loads of mistakes, even if they're switching from small sets to larger sets.
Leaf.... kinda speaks for itself
Bowman- small 48 set, even then some cropping consistency issues. Bigger 49 set with still more problems that had to be fixed.
Topps- small 51, a couple variations because of trades. 52 large set, Loads of variations, like different backs on the first series
Fleer - a few things with the small sets, loads of problems with the first big set in 81
Donruss- Experienced with non sports, big baseball set in 81= problems.
Score- Lots of problems in 88.
UD - Oddly pretty good in 89. No more really than any other company at the time. But they probably only used one printer that they may have owned.
Pacific sort of eased into bigger sets from smaller ones and I think went into football first. and we know how that went.....
Who else? I sort of forget what was owned by who in the 90's.
Even with Topps, I expect big things on the variation front
