Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
We should both read the opinion and amicus briefs to understand better the specific objections to the language. I do think parts of it are vague and arguably could be construed to support certain actions, but at the same time I agree with you that there isn't anything blatant on its face, at least as I read it.
|
Do you recall the name of the case? I’ll track down the text.