Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
It's the criteria because it is the one you chose to use with the words you wrote. We'll quote that back again too:
It still sometimes amazes me that so many posters do not seem to understand a forum thread records what was said. Your directly stated justification for why you cannot understand criticism of the contract is Judge's 62 dingers and 212 OPS+ before signing the contract. Your second paragraph is arguing that even if only does it once more, it's a good deal.
|
Again, I was talking about production. And yeah, if he leads the league in homers, RBI's, on base, slugging, OPS and OPS+ again, the deal's worth it. It doesn't matter if the numbers are exactly the same, it's the production.
I guess I should have clarified but I didn't realize things could get so pedantic.